similar to: Filtering RTP/SIP protocol (Voip)?

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

Hi, I appologise for the bad ettiquite of this, but I have tried looking for some HTB examples that would help me, and am having trouble understanding how the tc filters should work, but I can''t figure out why this isn''t working. I''ve written this script, based upon the ultimate traffic shaper at LARTC, to try and shape for me and my 3 housemates. The idea being to

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

OK, I''m stumped. I''ve read through most of the LARTC HOWTO and have yet to find a basis for what I need to accomplish. I have a Linux box that controls access to and from the Internet at my workplace. We have a number of remote employees that connect via PPTP and IPSEC to the office''s internal network. Some of these remote employees are currently using SIP phones.

Hi All, There was only one interesting ORC-specific commit this week: A new example showing how to initialize and de-initialize JITDylibs has been added in llvm/examples/OrcV2Examples/LLJITWithInitializers. The Extensible RTTI system (https://reviews.llvm.org/D39111) that I posted a while back has landed. While this is not ORC specific, I expect it to be used in upcoming patches to allow ORC

Hi. there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic, in order to put in a highest prio class ? Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but next both server and client seems jump to a random(?) port. I can''t use CONNMARK because is udp traffic. I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4 kernel series . When you patch 2.4 kernel with

Hi, I have a cable modem with a bandwidth capped upload rate. I''d like to prioritize packets going outbound according to the TOS header of the IP field. I''ve read through the LARTC Howto several times, and I think I have a good feel for the information it it. It also seems that what I''m trying to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO

hello, a friend of mine have this configuration: 10 x PC -- router/linux/rh8 -- ADSL Modem -- ISP let''s say that the bandwidth is: 5M and 800K he does dc++ and counter-strike, so let''s say the UP is full, and the ping from the counter server is 300ms, the server cut the connection, and no more game, the player is unhappy. The normal ping is 50ms. so he thinks to put some

i have been googling and reading the docs on how to set up a fair que that gives each user or client ip equal bandwidth. most, if not all, i find are examples how to prioritize by the type of traffic such as ssh, http, ftp, smtp, and various p2p. is it possible to set up cues for each ip on the subnet where each user gets a fair turn. i would probably have to set the max bandwidth and total

i have a customer that needs to plug the phones into the pc's using the pass-through rj45 available on most sip phones the question they are asking me is how to keep the data network separate from / secure from the voip network i understand they can set up vlans but i am hazy on a few details 1 since the phones are plugged into the pc's how will the phones be segmented into their own

Hello I am anirudh, I need help to write script to fetch detail like ips, speedlimit from mysql and add htb rules at the starting of the server. it is for a small isp i am working for. can any one help me out!, i had tried but fail to limit speed -- Anirudh Chowdary _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi routing-experts ! If I want to prioritize up ssh and telnet traffic with Linux 2.4 netfilter and iproute2. I''ve set outbound tcp 22, 23 and 21 TOSbits to minimize delay, but this doesn''t seem to be enough to prioritize ssh over for example http-traffic. I''m using modem to connect to Internet and got an entire LAN behind the Linux router/firewall. Well, I think most

Hi guys, I want to priorize traffic comming down from internet on my ppp0 int I want port 80 and 21 (and others ) to have preference over P2P traffic, I don''t want to bann P2P just give to it less prio than other more vital services... does anyone know how to do it or where to read on. Thanks in advance

Hello, I need to limit the bandwidth to 1Mbit per user IP (and never give more) and inside of each 1Mbit prioritize minimum-delay traffic (video stream from specific servers, so I mangle TOS for packets from those). The problem is I need this for *thousands* of users. I am guessing thousands of classes are needed, but the question is, is this feasible? Could one machine ever handle this? How

I refer to a problem that appeared on the flac list last August that was either solved off-list or abandoned. (http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/2005-August/000468.html) The problem is with using the C++ encoder classes, particularly the FLAC::Encoder::File:set_metadata function. JC said that the developers version of how to add a simple metadata block looked right, but it did not work for

I have to agree with Alp here. I’ve seen a number of review threads that either seem to be missing emails or in which the emails arrive days in unintelligible orders. I don’t know that we need to cut off use of it, but we need to prioritize resolving this issue. —Owen On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it's all

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

I have a policy doubt. Suppose next scenario: I''ve a Internet link (1 Mb upload, and 1 Mb download). That link is maneged with a Linux QoS box (HTB/eSFQ and so on). Suppose that I''ve 50 customers sharing Internet Link, and I must to assign 3 ranges of bandwidth for them. Gold customers: 128 kbits Silver customers: 64 kbits brass customers: 32 kbits Next, I create classes

Hi, I'm working on a Wifi VoIP project specification. It will have almost 8 APs and 20-30 wifi phones. And after some research, I still having some questions ... 1) Are Managed Access Points (and switch controllers) really important to implement good wifi woip (w/ low latency and acceptable handover time) ? 2) What is the difference between (3com WX1200 + 3com AP 3750) and (DES-1228P +

Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. I want to search for something across all of them, but prioritize results to favor one or some of those DBs over others. Is there a way to do that without reindexing? Or