similar to: Multiple shaping on a single physical interface

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

I'm deploying a CentOS 7 box as a gateway and I'm trying to figure out how to set up traffic shaping. Historically I've used the Wondershaper script but apparently it's not deprecated in favor of superior queue management. I haven't yet found a packaged solution and I'm wondering what others do to configure this kind of thing. Apparently the new modules are available

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

Hi, I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem. I''m already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the wondershaper.htb doesn''t use the ceil parameter? It should implement bandwidth borrowing!) but i found the ingress policy a little bit rough. I''d like to keep the traffic categories

This was so interesting I had to move it to its own thread! Is anyone using this script? How does it perform compared to the older WonderShaper script? -M- ================== Thanks Kristian I will checkout the new script and see how it goes! Jonn -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

Hi - I''ve been going through the LARTC how-to and have successfully used the sample scripts (and wondershaper) with my xDSL links. I''m now faced with the challenge of providing 8 users at work an effective remote access connection over a PSTN ppp connection. The critical traffic in this case relates to our stock enquiry application which is running over terminal services.

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

Hi, I''m trying to modify the Wondershaper script so achieve the following. 1. Prioritize traffic to the few IP addresses. 2. Everyone else should get a fair amount of bandwidth The problem I am facing is when I run this script is that the bandwidth seems to get halved. I tried to apply this script to a site where the upstream and downstream were fully saturated. I immediately saw

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

Hi folks, So, I have a pretty simple setup - a linux router machine running as a firewall/router for a small neighborhood LAN (approx 20 machines). I also have squid running on the box in non-transparent mode, and also I have set up NAT for TCP/UDP ports above 1024 for all clients and SSH/POP/SMTP/CVS NAT''d for selected ones based on MAC filtering. No hosts whatsoever can access ports 80

I''m trying to setup traffic shaping on my linux gateway/router. The system has 3 interfaces: eth0 - My LAN - with IP address 192.168.0.254 eth1 - The ethernet connection to which my ADSL modem is connected. This has a 10.25.x.x IP, more on this later. The ADSL link has an upstream of ~1.2mbit. ppp0 - The PPP connection which is my WAN connection, with a real world IP. The system acts

Hi, all I am doing "prrof of concept" system. I will have two IP phones connected to Asterisk box. Box itself will have 1 PSTN conenction and one analog phone conenction. A basic minimal configuration. At the moment I am planning to use an old PII-350 with 128M of RAM I have lying around. I can not test anything yet, as I am waiting for phones to arrive, so question is will that be

Hi there good people, I''m a newbie in what concerns running Linux on machines other than desktops, so I need help from all you gurus out there :-) I have Linux installed on an old computer (Winchip C6, Pentium clone), acting as a router/firewall for two other computers. Both these machines are connected to the firewall via a dedicated ethernet card each, on different subnets,

I''m having a network inside of a dsl modem and I''m using wondershaper on the computers to be able to surf while bulk downloading. The problem is that also the internal traffic is shaped, which means the internal network is at 200kb/s, instead of 100Mb/s. Is there a way to exclude the internal adresses from the wondershaper rules, or is there any other good way to solve this?

Hi all, ive got wondershaper working well with the highest download while maintaing minimal latency but the problem is this: ive got 2 nics in the linux router eth0 and eth1. eth1= internet interface but this is connected to a router say 10.0.0.190, now off that router there are other servers, mail server, domino server etc now if i shape on eth1 ingress and egress using the wondershaper script

Hi group, first of all: I am new to this group and hope to bring in some value later. At the moment I am such a beginner that I will probably of no use to anyone and only be asking stupid questions... I am running a little private linux server with kernel 2.4.21. It serves as a gameserver, webserver and mailserver, mainly. It also does the pppoe connect via a DSL modem to my provider and the NAT

Hello list. I have been trying to figure this out on my own, but I guess I somewhat failed :) A linux router with external eth0 and internal eth1 acts as a gateway for a number of machines utilizing a partial T1 line (512kbps). Since the T1 is limited by hardware and by its nature to 64kbps per channel the most I can pump out of it is up+down < 512kbps. If a number of workstations amount to

Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As stated by your message, I''ll try it again on the mailing list.. I tried your wondershaper today and there is one thing I am puzzling about. If I add port 80 and 21 like this NOPRIOPORTSRC=''80 21'' The uploads from my webserver and ftp server are a lot faster then without adding the ports and surfing the web is a pain. If

Hello! I recently upgraded my computer from Mandrake 8.2 to Mandrake 9.0. I used a very slightly modifed WonderShaper and it worked beautifully. But now when I try to run the same cbq shaping script on Mandrake 9.0 i get this output RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: No such file or