similar to: Samba 3 member, winbind caching and DC availability

In a leap of faith, I decided to relax the iptables rules on our Samba DC (4.0.5) on Wednesday, permitting some of our production clients to actually authenticate against it (in addition to our W2k3R2 DC). After all, there are no replication errors and no errors either in log.samba or Windows event log, so things _should've_ been generally working, and various test clients also have had no

I can't install Samba 4 in practically any fashion. I've tried Debian packages without much success (see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085301.html) I later on figured out that it is not possible to use those packages without using ntvfs (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679678). I've attempted to compile it from source under Debian

I can compile Samba4 beta 4, but can't install it: root at samba4dc:/usr/src/samba-4.0.0beta4# ./configure.developer <snip> 'configure' finished successfully (49.871s) root at samba4dc:/usr/src/samba-4.0.0beta4# make WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf build <snip> Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/src/samba-4.0.0beta4/bin' 'build' finished successfully

I'm in a situation where I should establish an external (i.e. non-AD) LDAP directory for my employer for various web-based authentication purposes. I don't think that Samba--or Windows AD, for that matter--in and itself would be the best tool for this purpose; so far I've been reviewing 389 DS, ApacheDS, OpenDJ and plain old OpenLDAP, but have made no final decision yet. Now however,

Hello, We have two DCs. One runs Windows 2003 R2, and the other Samba 4.0.5. Forest functional level is Windows 2000 native. I recently demoted (worked flawlessy now, which was a great relief), rebuilt and re-promoted my Samba 4 DC, as my problems that I posted to this list about two monts were still unresolved (see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171898.html), and I thoght

I have just installed dovecot on a RedHat Enterprise 4 clone with exim MTA, procmail LDA and mbox format. I'm getting complaints of slow caching from a Mac user: I think there's still something very sick with [host]'s IMAP server: it just took a full five minutes to cache an attachment (350kb) in an email from [person]. In that time, I couldn't do

> An orphaned package? anyone in Switzerland know if there's an alternative? Note the email. I guess CRAN-R should be notified. regards, Bob C > The original message was received at Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:32:57 -0700 > from vayu.arc.nasa.gov [143.232.122.22] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > <juerg.schmidli at env.ethz.ch> >

Mandi! Denis Cardon via samba In chel di` si favelave... > You can put your service accounts in an OU and add a GPO that deny > logon/services/tasks locally. Shortly come back. I've created a 'Restricted' OU, a 'Restricted' group (i'm short in fantasy, today ;) and i've created an 'mta' user, both user and group in 'Restricted' OU, of course.

I'm trying to install postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL on a newly installed CentOS 3.3 boxen and I get the following error: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:postfix ########################################### [100%] link /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz incorrect for slave mta-sendmailman (/usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz

On 17 May 2020, at 11:08, Chris Bennett <chris-dvcot at freedomforlife.rocks> wrote: > > I realize that I dumpimg a lot of info out there. But not what we need. doveconf -n postfix -n (or equivalent) What MTA you are using (postfix, etc) Errors in mail.log showing the failures. > I can shoot for system users, but I really want to get the virtual users > working. This is a

Hello everyone, I am getting an error message on FreeBSD 4 after I install dovecot. To start off, I create two regular users, testuser and testuser1. I send each user emails then I install dovecot. After installing dovecot I set up the users in Maildir format then proceed to send them emails and here is what shows up in the maillogs: Email to testuser3 - Mar 29 22:34:52 myserver

I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu) Date:

For some reason I'm getting Access denied errors when I try to execute a .bat file that resides on a TRU64 samba share, from a Win95 command prompt. The drive is mapped as x:\ & for the sake of testing, the directory has been recursively set to 777 (chmod). Command prompt output: x:\> x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\build_sharc_fta.bat Access denied -

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you

Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of daemon that listens for SMTP and then offers incoming email to Dovecot's LMTP socket. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at

What's the reason for the burst of sendmail complaints below? My CentOS 4.3 server only handles internal mail for my small network. It doesn't handle Internet mail at all, so I guess I can't blame a crack attempt for this. IPTables rules should prevent external connections to everything except SSH's port 22. I've looked through the other logs hoping that some other activity

Hi, My situation is as follows. -An internet-facing spam filter relays email to destination mail server (Dovecot) with SMTP. - Dovecot should take email and deliver it to user's mailboxes. I guess I'd need LMTP for this. - An external SMTP relay is already in place. I am thinking of using Dovecot submission to relay to the external relaying cluster. So, both relaying and routing are done

On Sat, 2013-02-16 Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:55 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 12:52 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:50 -0500, Thomas Simmons wrote: >> > > Thank you, Andrew. Just to be clear, you're saying I can upgrade to 4.0.3 >> > > (but do nothing after make install)? If

Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my maillog look like : 4624 at myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=myserver.com [127.0.0.1] Jun 14 19:07:01 at6412 sendmail[24627]: q5EN71jC024627: from=<>, size=3958, class=0, nrcpts=1,

Hi all, We've recently migrated from a separate DNS server that was dynamically updated with BIND's update-policy, using a manually generated tkey-gssapi-keytab (plus a second server functioning as an ordinary slave to the first), to BIND9_DLZ. The setup predated Samba's AD DC support and BIND's DLZ support, and was originally established because even though we needed AD, we were