similar to: Layer 3 switching...

I see what you want me to do. But it does incur an extra MAC layer header to each VPN packet, more fragmentation. And broadcasts leak to all peers. It sure saves you from doing any improvements, but there are side effects that are undesirable to many customers. This is specially a problem if I want two VPN connections between two sites using redundant connections, we get an instant L2 loop. With

Hello, Is routing within the same network possible? If it is, what configuration should I put for the firewall/router shown below? I basically want the host debian13 to be able to send packets via a multi-homed firewall. I think the multi-homed firewall involve some routing. +-------------------+ |debian13 | |eth0:192.168.0.13 | +-------------------+ |eth0 |

No, this would in fact operate as a routing mode instead of bridging. TAP would be used as a means to push routing to where it belongs, the linux/bsd/... kernel. Consider the challenge of having completely dynamic routing between vpn peers. In one minute I might have 10000 routes towards one specific peer, and hour latter I might have NONE. And I need to diferentiate each peer at the kernel

What challenge this would solve ? VPN software in general tries to be another router when running in server mode with multiple clients. This restricts VPN customers from having complex topology. For instance, I'd like to have two tunnels between each client network and each server (with two broadband connections on each end), with some OSPF running and automatically switching from one to

Hi, I want to add 2 vlans by the following steps: 1. add the vlan interfaces: vconfig add eth0 100 --vlan100 vconfig add eth0 101 --vlan101 2. modify the network-bridge script by the websit, http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-04ebcc1760dbc4678e83b116afa310dc0612dc39 Comment each time ifup or ifdown commands are executed.The reason is that ifdown ends with

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.

Hi all, Can someone say me the theoretic way of packet in the kernel. When the packet will be send to a IMQ device? When the packet arrives to post routing time? When operation of NAT occur? befor or later that the packet will send to net device? Thanks Bye Simone -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Problemi di Liquidità? Con Logos

Hi everybody, First of all, let me say that I searched a lot on the internet. I spent several hours sitting after my notebook, but I can't configure my network bridge in Ubuntu. I'm really desperate, so I hope somebody can point me out what I'm doing Hardware: ----------------------------------------------------------- $ lspci | grep controller 06:05.0 Network controller: Intel

I have question about multipath routing. I am running a 2.6.7 kernel (gentoo). I have a route with three nexthops on the same interface. I see a different nexthop being picked for different destination addresses. All is fine. Now if one of the nexthop goes down (arp entry times out and arp request doesnt get a response), does it remove the nexthop from contention and only use the remaining two

I''m being cast headlong into unfamiliar waters here, and being desperate for some air, thought I''d come here for some help. :) Anyway, my employer is going through some whiplash-inducing growth spurts, and as a result, the simple "Internet T-1 -> Linux Firewall/NAT -> LAN" setup just isn''t going to cut it anymore. First, we''re bringing in 2

Hi - Still plugging away at my Linux bridge/firewall and thinking through the consequences. In a normal firewall situation, the Internet is on one side, the internal LAN on the other. Duh! But now, with a Linux bridge in the middle, the whole thing becomes one big messy LAN. So we have a scenario that looks like this: Internal---User---Core-----Firewall---Internet---Internet router Servers

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:40 AM Thiago Oliveira <cpv.thiago@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ales, > > I would like to prevent the guests from different subnets start a > communication. In other words I have the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and > 192.168.2.0/24 and the guests from 192.168.1.0/24 cannot reach/talk with > guests on 192.168.2.0/24 at the same host. Is this possible using a

Hi, I believe ndas devices (http://www.ximeta.com/web/technology/) use raw Ethernet frames, as they require no tcp/ip configuration, the client finds and authenticates with a code that is different for each device sold, like a network mac address. My pc is on a different segment to the ndas devices that we have, the two segments are linked by a linux box that is doing routing and proxy arp, can

Hello, I would like to make filter that allows communication only between specified VMs. Those VMs should be specified by their MAC address. The filter should extend clean-traffic but I was not able to get it working with that reference. I have came up with modified clean-traffic which works fine [1]. Is there a way to achieve the same behavior with reference to clean-traffic? Thank you. Best

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

hello list (and martin) ;x i have now composed my final(?) policy routing design. the goals i had when beginning with this, for you that have not follow mine and martins thread, was to 1) only let 192.168.1/24 to see all routes, 2) not route between defined networks, except to and from 192.168.1/24 and 3) not defined networks should only be able to reach 192.168.1/24. this might sound simple.

Shamelessly reusing the announcement Arnaud sent about three months ago for nut-2.2.1: "We're preparing to release 2.2.1-pre2, so if you have some fixes to backport on Testing, consider announcing it and doing asap. As always, compatibilities update and bugfixes only!" Regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1

Hey guys, I am planning to buy some components for a Linux router that will handle the Internet access of 200 computers (includes tc shaping) and some inter sub-network routing (at least 100MBps per eth - and there are 3 eth cards). I was thinking of a: Pentium 4 - 3GHz 256 or 512MB RAM Network Cards. Now - I wonder what is more important: the processor speed or the amount of RAM. And can you

John Ackermann N8UR via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I am monitoring via the SNMP driver an APC SmartUPS that has split > phase (2L + neutral) 240V input and 120/120 volt outputs. The data > for the voltages is not what I'm expecting, and I am wondering how I > should interpret it. Wow, that sounds kind of industrial. Model? Is the