similar to: Help With WRR

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Guys Oppologies for the cross post. I''ve been scouring the docs coming with the wrr patches and for the life of me I can''t figure out why there are 8 parameters for each class. <snip> weight1, min1, decr1, incr1, weight2, min2, decr2, incr2 </snip> According to the docs these parameters are handled the same way, but looking at the example scripts there are

Attaching WRR to a hfsc ot htb class after a while i will get all packets drop and syslog full of HFSC or HTB : Non-work-conserving qdisc any ideas ? -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

After starting to shape local traffic now i am getting a lot of kernel panics in tcp_retransmit, so i decided to update my kernel from 2.6.17.14 to 2.6.21.1 , the problem is that after that i get: # iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ --todev 0 iptables: No chain/target/match by that name so i can not redirect ttraffic to IMQ device. and modules are loaded. - # lsmod Module

Ok , let`s go again with shaping a bridge interface. The environment is a dd-wrt firmware router. I have vlan1 interface connected to the DSL modem , and a br0 interface connecting wired and wireless machines. lets begin with the doubts , I have [example]: tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb default 999 tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:999 htb rate 16kbit ceil 16kbit well , all

Hi , i am trying to understand how RED queue discipline works but i am having a few troubles. The parameters are MIN , MAX , LIMIT , BURST I put LIMIT = 64Kb, so if i am not wrong it should PDROP anything over this value , right ? i put MIN = 8Kb , so no drops at all below this value, right ? i put MAX = 16Kb, starts to early drop anything above this using probability P. I put probability at

Hi , i am trying to add a driver to windows using the smbclient and rpc commands [got those from cupsaddsmb -v commands] and i am getting : smbclient //localhost/print$ -U $PASS -N -c ' mkdir W32X86;put GENERIC.ppd W32X86/GENERIC.ppd;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ps5ui.dll W32X86/ps5ui.dll;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/pscript.hlp W32X86/pscript.hlp;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/pscript.ntf

In esfq README i have: Depth sets the number of slots. If the number of active flows is greater than the number of slots, flows will end up sharing slots and ESFQ will no longer be fair. If you anticipate more than 128 concurrently active flows, you should use a larger depth and probably a larger divisor (see below). If you expect there to be far fewer than 128 concurrent flows, you

Hi, i am trying to migrate my print servers from windows to linux , everything is getting really nice but i still face a few problems , and since i don't know if i need help from cups or samba guys i will post to both lists, so maybe someone can give me some help. Well, i have now cups and samba working just fine, i can authenticate my users in cups from Active Directory using winbind and

i am trying to do some traffic classification using the PRIO qdisc and i am having a few problems. I have a root htb class: tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 255 r2q 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 768kbit and a child PRIO tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:99 htb rate 96kbit ceil 600kbit prio 0 tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:99 prio tc filter

Hi guys , i am starting to "play" with qos in linux. Well , i am trying to setup an ingress filter but i do not know why it is not working. tc add qdisc dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 160kbit burst 256kbit drop flowid :1 After that : iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 So , i think this

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

Dear R helpers,   I have following input files. (Actually they are more than 10 rates but here i am considering only 2 rates to write my problem)   rate1.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3           max3 1.05        1.30               1.30          1.65             1.65          1.99   rate2.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3          

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

hi all i want to first apollogiaze if my message will annoy you(my guess is because it will be quite large:)) i have the following situation on my hands i was recently faced with the problem of traffic shaping/bandwith limiting. my setup is(very common i guess) -internet comming in(going out) through eth0 -internet is being "shared" with the private local network via eth1. i

Hi all, I'm demonstrating a block entry regression using R for my regression class. For each block, I get the R**2 and the associated F. I do this with separate regressions adding the next block in and then get the results by writing separate summary() statements for each regression. Is there a more convenient way to do this and also to get the change in R**2 and associated F test for

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

is possible to setup any bandwith resource control in a ppp0 interface? i''d like to distribute bandwith equally between pcs in a network, and inside each pc, equally between protocols... is this possible? all the documentation refers to eth0 type interfaces... so? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego