Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Ext3 Repair"
2014 Sep 21
1
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On 09/20/2014 12:07 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
>>
>> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
>>
>> I am reporting this per
2020 May 28
2
Recover from an fsck failure
This is CentOS-6x.
I have cloned the HDD of a CentOS-6 system. I booted a host with that drive
and received the following error:
checking filesystems
/dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_root: clean, 128491/4096000 files, 1554114/16304000
blocks
/dev/sda1: clean, 47/120016 files, 80115/512000 blocks
/dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_home: clean, 7429/204800 files, 90039/819200 blocks
2014 Sep 20
0
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
>
> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
>
> I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List.
I would
2014 Sep 20
4
Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S
to mkfs,
and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users
Mailing List.
The following is the mailing list exchange:
On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On
2016 Aug 08
0
centos 6.8 creates install to sde instead of sda
greetings one and all.
when attempting to install centos 6.8 to an i386 mid tower, during
setup of hard disk partitions, selection is for /dev/sde.
if continued, after reboot, error is displayed after 'welcome to centos'.
lines read:
Checking filesystem
fsck.ext4: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sda3
/dev/sda3:
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
2002 Jan 05
1
root fs not mounting ext3
I am using SuSE 7.3 compiled ext3 support into the kernel and installed it.
All my partitions load up as ext3 except / . I ran tune2fs several times,
still doesn't take on the / drive. Most recent dumpe2fs -h show no features
on that drive=, I keep going around in circles, removing .journal from / and
running tune2fs but it never works for /
What am I doing wrong? ( thanks in advance)
2012 Jan 30
2
One of my servers wont boot today
Hi All,
One of my servers upon a restart today comes up with an error
checking filesystems:
fsck.ext3: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/VolGroup-1/Logvol00.
/dev/VolGroup-1/LogVol00. The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then
2005 Mar 22
1
ext2fs_read_bb_inode: Invalid argument && Can't read an block bitmap
Hello,
sorry if the question was asked a couple of times before but I couldn't
find any useful hinds to this problem using google and the listman
search-engine of the archive of this list.
Somehow the ext3 filesystem on one of my machines died an after a reboot
grub wouldn't come up again.
What I did so far:
fsck -y /dev/hda4
fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
2014 May 10
1
location of file-system information on ext4
Hi,
I zero-filled first 10MiB of my SSD(dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=10M
count=1). As expected, this wiped my primary GPD header and first
partition. Before the wipe, GPT was following:
Disk /dev/sda: 250069680 sectors, 119.2 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): 2EFD285D-F8E6-4262-B380-232E866AF15C
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last
2010 Feb 27
1
e2fsprogs Help.
Hello,
Hope you will forgive me for asking some very simple question about
e2fsprogs. I am very new to the kernel as
well as file system programming.
My task is to collect superblock, inode, bitmap ( or free list) information
from ext2/ext3 filesysteam. After searching
the google, I came to know about e2fsprogs, which I was able to install and
use at least "dumpe2fs" utility. This
2007 Mar 14
4
"No space left on device" but there is space
Hi,
I've been receiving message "No space left on device" but there is space.
I've forced fsck on reboot 2 times but did not solve.
# yum
rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/__db.001: No space left on device
error: db4 error(28) from dbenv->open: No space left on device
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - No space left on device (28)
error: cannot open Packages database in
2014 Oct 10
0
Re: CF Card wear optimalisation for ext4
On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I been using CF cards for almost more then 7 years now with ext
> file-system without any major problems on ALIX boards.
>
> Last year I took 30 other systems in production with ext4 and the CF
> cards been dropping out pretty fast, it may have been a bad batch but
2007 Sep 20
8
How are alternate superblocks repaired?
Hi,
Using dumpe2fs I have been able to determine that all of my alternate ext3 superblocks are corrupted (not clean), and only the primary superblock is valid, i.e. mount works and the ordered journal is applied. When the primary superblock gets flakey, i.e. the ext_attr Filesystem feature goes missing - not sure why this occurs. At this point, the mount does not apply the journal using the
2023 Nov 28
0
possible LVM corruption?
While updating a hypervisor, I'm getting the following errors printed to
the terminal during rpm upgrade scripts.? The first line is printed 15
times, and GRUB prints a similar error at boot.? "vgck" doesn't seem to
find any problems.? Does anyone have suggestions for diagnosing the issue?
error: ../grub-core/disk/diskfilter.c:524:unknown node
2023 Nov 09
0
can I convert a linear thin pool to raid1?
In the past, I've used LVM on MD RAID, and I'd like to try using LVM
RAID in order to also add dm-integrity data to some LVs.? I've added new
PVs to my VG, and I've converted some of my LVs to raid1 types, but I
also have one thin pool that I use for VMs with multiple layers of
snapshots.? That pool can't be converted, directly:
# lvconvert --type raid1 -m 1
2022 Jan 09
1
rd.lvm.lv on CentOS Stream 9 (first-boot failure)
I've install a CentOS Stream 9 system from a kickstart file that
specified (among other things) several logical volumes:
logvol / --fstype="ext4" --size=10240 --name=lv_root --vgname=VolGroup
logvol /var --fstype="ext4" --size=4096 --name=lv_var --vgname=VolGroup
logvol swap --fstype="swap" --size=2048 --name=lv_swap --vgname=VolGroup
When that system rebooted,
2014 Dec 04
3
xen-c6 fails to boot
Thanks all for the advice.
It seems there is an issue with Dracut booting from these hosts when LVM is used.
dracut: Scanning devices sda2 for LVM logical volumes VolGroup/lv_swap VolGroup/lv_root
dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_swap' [1.94 GiB] inherit
dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_root' [230.69 GiB] inherit
dracut: PARTIAL MODE. Incomplete logical volumes will be
2014 Dec 09
0
xen-c6 fails to boot
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Bob Ball <bob.ball at citrix.com> wrote:
> Thanks all for the advice.
>
> It seems there is an issue with Dracut booting from these hosts when LVM is used.
>
> dracut: Scanning devices sda2 for LVM logical volumes VolGroup/lv_swap VolGroup/lv_root
> dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_swap' [1.94 GiB] inherit
> dracut: inactive
2022 Jan 10
1
rd.lvm.lv on CentOS Stream 9 (first-boot failure)
On 1/9/22 15:37, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> 1: The system also includes a volume group named "BackupGroup" and
> that group activates on boot (post-dracut).? Why are those LVs
> activated when rd.lvm.lv is specified?
As far as I can tell, this is because in the dracut boot process, the
device backing VolGroup is activated, but the device backing BackupGroup
is not.? As a
2008 Mar 03
3
LVM and kickstarts ?
Hey,
Can anyone tell me why option 1 works and option 2 fails ? I know I
need swap and such, however in trouble shooting this issue I trimmed
down my config.
It fails on trying to format my logical volume, because the mount point
does not exist (/dev/volgroup/logvol)
It seems that with option 2, the partitions are created and LVM is setup
correctly. However the volgroup / logvolume was not