similar to: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Status of Pound-2.3.2 X-SSL-certificate single-line patch ?

Hi, I''ve recently been trying to setup Mongrel behind Pound so that I can do mutual SSL authentication. I''ve had a few problems with Pound (documented at [1]), but now have it working correctly. However, I think there is a problem with Mongrel and how it deals with the headers Pound adds to the HTTP header block. One of the extra headers Pound adds is

Is anyone using the setup described at the Rails blog? http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/7/3/pound-makes-lighty-and-mongrel- play-nice I''m using it in production, and the only problem I have is the same as people have described in the comments over there, namely that Rails thinks all requests come from localhost. See http://isabont.com/requestinfo for the headers. Any

So I''ve done some Mac OS X pkgs for the latest Facter and Puppet, as well as a combined mpkg for them both. Jeff McCune and I are doing a fair bit of testing on them this week in preparation for MacWorld, so I wasn''t going to upload them to the official site for another few days, but they''re looking pretty good. http://explanatorygap.net/puppet/Facter_1.3.8.pkg.zip

Now that the scheduler can deal with migrate disable properly, there is no real compelling reason to make it only available for RT. There are quite some code pathes which needlessly disable preemption in order to prevent migration and some constructs like kmap_atomic() enforce it implicitly. Making it available independent of RT allows to provide a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic() and makes

So I''m still working on a ''perfect'' setup so I can document it on the wiki, and will submit some puppet patches against 0.23.2 next week, but here''s what I''ve done that has made a big difference to stability here. in puppetmasterd at line 261, I''ve modified the Mongrel instantiation from: server = Mongrel::HttpServer.new(addr,

But I can't think of a reason that valgrind needs executable data segment. It is likely that valgrind assumes some specific segment layout that the GNU linker creates and can't handle other layout even if it is valid. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:21 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > --rosegment puts read-only data and executable text in a single segment > and make it

So I can''t quite see how to do this in the existing syntax. Ideally there would be an onlyif parameter for packages, but that doesn''t seem to be the case. I could create a fact that returns true or false depending on whether the file exists, but that doesn''t feel like the right way to do it either. I could do something like: $file_exists =

--rosegment puts read-only data and executable text in a single segment and make it executable, so your read-only code becomes executable. I think that shouldn't be a default behavior. If valgrind needs that, we can't fix it by changing the default. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:50 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Confirmed that -no-rosegment

Confirmed that -no-rosegment worked around the issue. However, a valgrind developer says that perhaps LLD is generating strange object files: <tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the normal rodata <tomhughes> so without it you have two <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard

Hi Folks, There was an error in the Pound documentation at: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/pound.html Basically the documentation has a sample config that only configures one backend for one service, which isn''t what people want. You actually want *three* backends in *one* service. Please go check that your configuration looks like the current documentation. Thanks. -- Zed A.

Hi, I''ve noticed an issue (or what I think is an issue) with mongrel_cluster: in the config file, I tell it to store pid files in / tmp/ and when I start it they get saved there, but when I run restart or stop, it says it can''t find pid files. Problem being: it looks for pid files in /path/to/my/app/tmp/. Is anyone else aware of this? I have lighty forwarding to pound

Fyi, here''s a write-up I just posted on deploying Rails with Mongrel(s) behind Pound: http://blog.tupleshop.com/articles/2006/07/08/deploying-rails-with- pound-in-front-of-mongrel-lighttpd-and-apache Rob

I was about to write a long post about how I couldn''t get request.ssl?to work in Rails behind Pound and Mongrel, but then I figured it out. In your pound.cfg file, just add: HTTPSHeaders 1 "X-Forwarded-Proto: https" Assuming you''ve got Pound working correctly with SSL, this will giveRails the header it''s looking for. If there''s any interest in a Debian

Hello, It seems like something has recently caused ? symbols to be displayed as \243 on our FreeBSD 6 server. We think this is causing our rails-based payment system to fail to process transactions which is obviously very bad for us! Why / How would this start happening? The server is configured to use UK ISO keyboard map and it was working fine until recently. I''m at a loss to

I''ve messed with Lighttpd, Litespeed, Apache, etc. All took too much "thinking" and trial and error to get my RoR apps up and running on a clean Linux system. (Note: I''m not saying these are BAD, just that they took me too much time to get going) This weekend I put some time into Pound and Mongrel and ended up getting that up and running in a very short amount of

some of my validation error messages contain a pound sign (the British currency, not #) however, this get''s shown as a question mark in the view. i can get round it by using the html reference (&pound;) instead of the literal character, but it seems a little counter-intuitive to handle this in the model... isn''t it view related? any suggestions? I''m developing

Hi I have registered a number with an external sip proxy which provides a real telephone number. I configured * to forward this number to an internal extension, this works. Now, I am trying to forward the external number for incoming calls to a macro, which includes Authenticate(). The authentication prompt comes up, but when using an external pstn phone over my telephone number, the # key is

Dear all, I've used trixbox to compose a custom IVR, and I've defined the input of pound key(#) leading to the repetition of the parent announcement. But each time the pound key is pressed, file "dir-intro.gsm" will always be played. Can any one tell me the reason? By the way,if I want to modify the build-in IVR, which configuration file should be edited? Thanks in advance.

Some more unusual ones: http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/intercal-man/tonsila.html -----Original Message----- From: Gary Gapinski [mailto:Gary.Gapinski@grc.nasa.gov] Sent: 24 July 2003 14:37 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] the 'pound' and '#' are the same? (OT Rambling) On Thursday 24 July 2003 01:21, John Laur wrote: > I haven't ever

So what are peoples thoughts about the new Digium software which appears to combines Asterisk, FreePBX(?), and Linux into one release to eliminate inter dependency issues and emphasizes stability. Seems like a much more professional way to go compared to Trixbox. Anyone using/testing it. I am curious what sort of opinions people have about it. http://www.rpath.org/rbuilder/project/asterisk