similar to: GNBD and DRBD kernel mods

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "GNBD and DRBD kernel mods"

2010 Mar 27
1
DRBD,GFS2 and GNBD without all clustered cman stuff
Hi all, Where i want to arrive: 1) having two storage server replicating partition with DRBD 2) exporting via GNBD from the primary server the drbd with GFS2 3) inporting the GNBD on some nodes and mount it with GFS2 Assuming no logical error are done in the last points logic this is the situation: Server 1: LogVol09, DRDB configured as /dev/drbd0 replicated to Server 2. DRBD seems to work
2006 Nov 07
4
gnbd vs drbd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid
2008 Jan 02
4
Xen, GFS, GNBD and DRBD?
Hi all, We're looking at deploying a small Xen cluster to run some of our smaller applications. I'm curious to get the lists opinions and advice on what's needed. The plan at the moment is to have two or three servers running as the Xen dom0 hosts and two servers running as storage servers. As we're trying to do this on a small scale, there is no means to hook the
2008 Sep 13
1
Missing 4.7 kernel update SRPMs ?
I can't find the kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.EL.src.rpm and kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4.src.rpm on the download sites - the binary i386/x86_64 RPMS are there, but not the matching SRPMs Does anyone know where they are? Thanks James Pearson
2005 May 11
5
Xen reboots on dom-U disk stress...
Hi all I tried to run bonnie++ disk stresser in dom-U, who''s disk is backed with non-local (on nfs) loop-back file. The machine rebooted pretty quickly. So, how do I tell what''s barfing? Is it Xen? Is it dom-0 (nfs or loop-back)? I looked in dom-0''s /var/log/messages and didn''t see any obvious record of a dom-0 whoopsie (but is that the right place to look
2007 Nov 13
2
lvm over nbd?
I have a system with a large LVM VG partition. I was wondering if there is a way i could share the partition using nbd and have the nbd-client have access the LVM as if it was local. SYSTEM A: /dev/sda3 is a LVM partition and is assigned to VG volgroup1. I want to share /dev/sda3 via nbd-server SYSTEM B: receives A''s /dev/sda3 as /dev/nbd0. I want to access it as VG volgroup1. I am
2007 Oct 03
0
CEBA-2007:0953 CentOS 5 i386 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4e3a0ef4b2ed1019df88196f418c86b7 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm 7eb54b0cee9bd23cf4eb3e0b98c10205 kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm
2007 Oct 26
0
CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 i386 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 3308267c6757d7219f6c6b0df781c78c kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm 936ca942c0bcf7e7a20e2a489e8d9d49 kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm
2007 Sep 21
0
CEBA-2007:0885 CentOS 5 i386 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0885 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c8c9a11857ac481dbcb1a9a1304f1833 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.i686.rpm 926604b20cf494d3e6c0a30d0cd7368b kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.i686.rpm
2007 Oct 03
0
CEBA-2007:0953 CentOS 5 x86_64 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 33ba3b44c574c0749ada598ba3ff74d0 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.x86_64.rpm 0c15de12384cc4b4130576fe2a3b3ffc
2007 Oct 26
0
CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 x86_64 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a063f498832ca79bf139ad3e05b3c374 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.x86_64.rpm 9b1d8cdb61fcef11aa72a4dd4b75dc1e
2007 Sep 21
0
CEBA-2007:0885 CentOS 5 x86_64 gnbd-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0885 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0a4e96f62cb787b49ebde18a41f9d4ea kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm 7f4022b8524043e4e6d2cc8d8d827c55
2007 Jul 30
3
kmod-drbd-smp (2.6.9-55.0.2.EL) has unknown symbols (kmod-drbd not).
Hi ! Not very blocking because the smp module loads perfectly. # yum --exclude=kmod-drbd*\plus\* install kmod-drbd Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Reducing CentOS-4 - Plus to included packages only Finished Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -->
2007 Oct 25
2
kmod-drbd
hi, I was following this wiki http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd for my CentOS 5 installation, but it appears that the kmod-drdb is not for the newest kernel. Would anyone know how long before this is updated? kmod-drbd i686 8.0.6-1.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5 extras kernel i686 2.6.18-8.el5 installed
2007 Oct 19
2
CentOS 5 centosplus kernel + kmod-gfs
On CentOS 5, the current centosplus kernel doesn't want to play with the kmod-gfs package (because kmod-gfs wants the stock kernel): # yum install kmod-gfs gives me: Transaction Check Error: package kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5.centos.plus (which is newer than kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5) is already installed Should it work, or is there a separate centosplus build that I've not
2009 Sep 09
3
Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hi All,<br> I'm just tried to install and build replicate failover PDC using DRBD and HA, but i can't load DRBD kernel module.<br> Now i'm using CentOS 5.3 up to date. This DRBD's
2006 Jun 07
14
HA Xen on 2 servers!! No NFS, special hardware, DRBD or iSCSI...
I''ve been brainstorming... I want to create a 2-node HA active/active cluster (In other words I want to run a handful of DomUs on one node and a handful on another). In the event of a failure I want all DomUs to fail over to the other node and start working immediately. I want absolutely no single-points-of-failure. I want to do it with free software and no special hardware. I want
2007 Sep 29
0
Probelm updatring a fresh install
I just installed CentOS-5 but when I try to update I get this: # yum clean all Loading "installonlyn" plugin Cleaning up Everything [root at inet02 ~]# yum update Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=========================|
2009 Dec 31
1
DRBD error : Invalid module format
Hi, I am trying to use drbd in my centos 5.4 but I keep getting errors. When I try modprobe -v drbd I receive insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko FATAL: Error inserting drbd (/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko): Invalid module format. The current (running) kernel is 2.6.18-164.el5PAE kmod-drbd-8.0.16-5.el5_3 drbd-8.0.16-5.el5.centos Any tips?
2009 Mar 14
2
Unable to use DRBD after a reboot
Hi, I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was fine until I had to reboot both servers. The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the (old primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd fs complaining about the modules. I've tried to find out the problem but the servers seem to have the same setup rpm -qa | grep drbd