similar to: ERROR: Invalid Mark Value (1) with HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes

I was previously using multiple providers on my "real linux" gateway which had a kernel that supported high marks and I was policy routing in tcrules. I''ve now moved to openwrt where their kernel apparently does not have high marks. I want to continue to be able to have multiple providers and a) policy route between them and b) be able to set marks for other things like

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

Hi, I have a firewall running IPTABLES. I have tried to route sip traffic from my WAN(eth3) interface to a VLAN(eth2.2) interface, however the data will not route to the VLAN it keeps routing to the default interface(eth2). Does anyone have an idea as to what I need to look for? Regards Jennifer Botten ETECH Tel: +2787 150 5285 Fax: 086 638 2412 Mobile: +27 82

Hi to the list, I configured a multi-provider setup with /etc/shorewall/providers: Orange 1 1 main eth1 81.255.74.150 track,balance=1 eth0 Free 2 2 main eth2 88.180.116.254 track,balance=3 eth0 and /etc/shorewall/tcrules: 2:P 192.168.2.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 143 2:P 192.168.2.0/24

Hello, I wonder if someone could use the TPROXY with Shorewall and transparent Squid  with using the routing rules on shorewall (tcrules) for hosts / networks (LAN) with multiples providers (WANs) directly from the internal network on port 80 (with TPROXY transparent squid or REDIRECT). On this issue, the routing rules is not work propertly because the source is the

Hi all, I have a strange problem in trying to install a transparent proxy (in my internal net not on the shorewall server) according to the instructions as outlined in http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#Local My Network looks the following: Internal Net: 10.0.0.0/24 Squid Server listening on port 3128 (ip 10.0.0.152, DNS name server01) | |

Hi all, I some vlan routing problem, I''m using a linux box with an 8021q kernel. I have connect eth2 ethernet controller from linux box to a switch port that carry for vlan tagged as 2 3 4 5, I''m able to connect to the internet from vlan but not to route traffic between vlan, this is the output of ifconfig -a: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:50:E5:B2

Hi all, I''m trying to put a linux GW running with this seput: Internet -> DSL Modem -> VLAN2 \ eth2.2 Linux > Lan eth2.3

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: normal My 32Bit Dom0-crashes with error "Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes" after doing moderate I/O on the local storage, which is a software-raid1 over 3 harddrives, connected to the builtin Perc H200 controller with ext3-fs. The error is reproduceable with "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1024 count=1000000"