similar to: ipsec and XEN

I have an admin machine, and a backup server which does backups. The backup server has IPMI so I can do lights-out admin, and I want to allow this from the admin machine only. IPMI is completely unfirewalled, and so it must have a different class C than working networks.... this is just how it is. I''ve set the IPMI IP on the backup server to 192.168.10.4, and created a virtual

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

I''m trying to plan out a new configuration for our new multi-isp setup. Part of what is confusing me is the asymmetry between the two setups. Our current ISP provides us with a router and our first public IP is used by its LAN port. Our new provider is not providing a router and I want to user our shorewall box as the router. I have 4 ports on it (currently configured for local,

I have a multi-isp configuration: CGCO 1 256 main $CGCOIF detect track,balance br-lan,tun0 IGS 2 512 main $IGSIF detect track,fallback br-lan,tun0 where I force SMTP out one of the connections: 512:P br-lan - tcp 25 But the effect of that of course is that if IGS goes down, SMTP will leak out of the CGCO connection. How can I prevent that? Cheers, b.

Hi All, I use rather old Shorewall 3.2.6 and I know it''s no longer supported. I haven''t been updating the software because it works as intended until now. The problem is a simple DNAT rule. I actually have around 8 DNAT rules and they all work just fine. Here is what I want to achieve. I have a SMTP server in my LAN (lets say address 192.168.1.10). The SMTP daemon listens on

Hi, I realise that one can simply start fail2ban and then it will insert its own ruleset before shorewall''s ruleset. Are there subscribers to this list having alternative (and probably better) ways to use both fail2ban and shorewall? Thanks, Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90

Tom : Firewall up not letting traffic through It is probably a setting that I have wrong Private Network: Can ping the outside network card from inside the network, but can not ping "yahoo.com" or one of its ip address (209.191.122.70) Firewall computer: On the firewall computer can ping computer on inside network and "yahoo.com" -- Eric Teeter 504 Main St.

Hi I have shorewall/iptables running on my server (pub) but access to localhost is blocked then I attemp to use ping localhost, telnet localhost 25, echo Hello | sendmail -v root@localhost. All these commands were run after using shorewall reset and creating the attached file. All these commands work with shorewall clear. My problem is I can''t email the root messages from (pub) to

Hello, I''m migrating my laptop setup to a shiny new ThnikPad W520 and in the process am getting rid of VirtualBox (marked by kernel maintainers as "unsupportable crap" or some such) and shifting to virt-manager/kvm. As with the old setup I am running shorewall-init exactly as the great online documentation lays it out. BUT: with VBox it was enough to add > net

Hi, My firewall is a machine running Debian Squeeze with shorewall 4.4.11.6. /etc/shorewall/policy says this: loc $FW ACCEPT loc loc ACCEPT loc net ACCEPT $FW net ACCEPT $FW loc ACCEPT net all DROP # info all all REJECT

Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to

Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to

Shorewall 4.5.1.1 is now available for download. Problems Corrected: 1) When checking or compiling for export (-e option), /sbin/shorewall would previously issue a warning message if the SHOREWALL_SHELL specified in the remote firewall''s shorewall.conf did not exist. 2) The changes to TOS handling in 4.5.1 are incompatible with older releases such as RHEL5 and

Hi All, I''m trying to setup a VPN Between a Linux Box (CentOS 4) and Check Point FW-1 (NGX R65) and I actually already done this. However I''m having a problem with Policy "none" when using ports, for example, I want to exclude from VPN the "ssh" service, so my commands to setkey was. # Excluded services ssh spdadd 172.20.0.0/16[any] 172.16.0.0/16[22] tcp -P

Hi all, after a half day searching for an error, sniffing and upgrading to the newest shorewall version I give up and the problem to you. I have following configuration in my /etc/shorewall/masq: #INTERFACE SOURCE ADDRESS vlan7::10.231.0.0/16 192.168.222.0/24 10.231.113.30 vlan7 192.168.222.0/24 10.1.0.38 Towards a

I am having problems in the implementation of a VPN, below made a project of my net: INTRANET (10.0.0.0/24) | 10.0.0.5 xl0 NetBSD IPNAT ( map wi0 10.0.0.0/24 -> 192.168.213.10 ) wi0 192.168.213.10/30 | | Wireless VPN | | 192.168.213.9/30 xl2 FreeBSD NATD ( divert natd all from any to any ) xl0 200.x.x.5/24 | 200.x.x.1/24

Hi all. The IPSec part of the LARTC howto is great, but I''ve hit a problem in 7.3. IPSEC tunnels. The example given is for manual keying: add 10.0.0.216 10.0.0.11 esp 34501 -m tunnel -E 3des-cbc "123456789012123456789012"; How does one setup "tunnel mode" using racoon? Trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between two subnets: 10.10.42.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 using a

Hi, I''m not sure this is the right list for this type of question... as IPSec isn''t exactly routing. If someone can point me to a dedicated IPSec list (for the 2.6 implementation) i''d be very grateful :) Onto the actual problem... I''m going to be using IPSec to secure a wireless access point. So far, in my experimentation, i have the tunnel from

I just wanted to drop a success notice to the list. We always hear the failures, and rarely the successes! ;-) After switching from FC1 and freeS/WAN ipsec to the new native linux 2.6 ipsec (ie: setkey-based) my QoS code suddenly started working properly! Previously, with FC1 and freeS/WAN, I found it impossible and rather buggy (kernel panics!) to get QoS to make any difference at all. My