similar to: Multi-provider halp

Hello, I wonder if someone could use the TPROXY with Shorewall and transparent Squid  with using the routing rules on shorewall (tcrules) for hosts / networks (LAN) with multiples providers (WANs) directly from the internal network on port 80 (with TPROXY transparent squid or REDIRECT). On this issue, the routing rules is not work propertly because the source is the

Hi all and specially Mr. Tom.... (Please, do not be acid with me please! I am only a newbie, trying learn more about shorewall) I get involved with a Firewall Project in a customer here in my city... In this customer, he has two Internet Providers. So, he ask me how make certain connection following one routing path (like RT_1) and others connections type, following the other routing path

Hi, Shorewall version -4.0.12-2 (EL5 rpm version) OS : Centos 5.2 I have shorewall successfully running on Linux with multi ISP. Trying to make services such as "rsync, ftp" go through my secondary ISP. For which I did the following eth0 : Internal LAN eth4 : DSL (Second ISP) => x.x eth5 : T1 (First ISP) => y.y Created the following entries in

Hello, When i restart the firewall when i put the HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes i can''t restart it, i receive the following message in the logs: 18:17:35 Compiling /etc/shorewall/providers ... ERROR: Invalid Mark Value (1) with HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes : /etc/shorewall/providers (line 13) My files have: tcrules: empty Providers:New 1 1 main eth0 192.168.1.1

Hi all I have been working with Shorewall connected to two ISPs lately, and I would like to suggest a couple of improvements to the MultiISP.html documentation page. I followed the examples in that page (but the legacy setup and the USE_DEFAULT_RT one), but I had problems with locally (by the firewall) generated packets: I wanted them to go out using only one ISP, but if I use a tcrules rule to

Hi, I was reading document http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#idp3634200. Inspired by the document I was trying to establish the following changes: * one additional interface: COMA_IF * COM[A,B,C]_IF interfaces request IP address via DHCP * all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic is NATed from INT_IF to COMA_IF * all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic from GW is routed via COMB_IF by default * non-RFC 1918

I have an admin machine, and a backup server which does backups. The backup server has IPMI so I can do lights-out admin, and I want to allow this from the admin machine only. IPMI is completely unfirewalled, and so it must have a different class C than working networks.... this is just how it is. I''ve set the IPMI IP on the backup server to 192.168.10.4, and created a virtual

Hi I have a default route to 192.168.1.1 as soon as I start shorewall the default route dissapear. What do I need to do to have it not disappear. Kind Regards My network setup /etc/network/interfaces: # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.17 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255

I was previously using multiple providers on my "real linux" gateway which had a kernel that supported high marks and I was policy routing in tcrules. I''ve now moved to openwrt where their kernel apparently does not have high marks. I want to continue to be able to have multiple providers and a) policy route between them and b) be able to set marks for other things like

Hello Guys I have problem with internet bank. I have 2 Internet links balancing mode, thus the bank is charging connection down. I tried to force Internet traffic (port 80 and 443) for only a link, however it did not work. How do I make a setting to force the connection to these ports for a specific link. Note: I can not use the file as route_rules have neither the source IP (ltsp) nor of

Hi, as per the shorewall MultiISP documentation ( http://www1.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html ), it says "Use of this feature requires that your kernel and iptables include CONNMARK target and connmark match support (Warning: Standard Debian™ and Ubuntu™ kernels are lacking that support!)." it means MultiISP wont work properly if i am using Ubuntu server. if yes whats the

Hello, I am trying to set up traffic shaping/control for my voip connection. I am running 4.4.22.3. Here is my current configuration: --- tcdevices --- #NUMBER: IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED #INTERFACE INTERFACES eth1 2048kbps 1500kbps -- tcclasses --- #INTERFACE:CLASS MARK RATE: CEIL PRIORITY OPTIONS # DMAX:UMAX eth1 1 100kbps

Hi all, I am having an issue with a multiple ISP setup. I have followed the docs online and I think I have everything setup correctly but I can get the desired traffice to go out my secondary ISP. A quick run down on what I am trying to acomplish. I want to send all sip/iax traffic out one ISP in the net zone and then send all other traffic out my secondary ISP in the dsl zone. Attached is

Hello, it seems I am hit by http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#Local : "Experience has shown that in some cases, problems occur with applications running on the firewall itself. This is especially true when you have specified routefilter on your external interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces (see above). When this happens, it is suggested that you have the application use specific local IP

Hello all, I''m reading the nice documentation about shorewall with multi isp. And I wonder about squid (non transparent) and shorewall Can I use on same machine, squid with ldap ident, dansguardian, and shorewall with multi-isp (four or five) ? Perhaps there is a problem because squid mask source IP, shorewall can maintain and load balance sessions for the same source IP ? Thanks Fred

Hello Asterisk sits in a Vserver guest (192.168.3.9) on the firewall. I can''t seem to get the sip helper to mark the SIP packets though. I have an ftp client on a different Vserver guest on the firewall. If I put ftp in the HELPER column of tcrules I can mark those packets. With sip in the HELPER column though nothing happens. Attached is a "shorewall dump > dump.txt"

Dear list, Shorewall is running here with 2 ISP''s: ISP1: corporate ADSL-line with fixed set of IP''s ISP2: fast consumer-grade cable-connection with higher bandwidth All our main traffic (web, e-mail) is routed trough ISP1. Only for special purposes (frequent large ftp-transfers) ISP2 is used, configured trough tcrules. ISP2 is not so reliable as ISP1 (duh) and they sometimes

I have just installed shorewall 2.0.9, having spent a day and a half tracking down why my tcrules wasn''t working properly in 2.0.8. I didn''t see the announcement of 2.0.9 because it didn''t go to -announce. Anyway I have 2.0.9 now (the package from Debian incoming) and the problem is still there. My tcrules file says: 1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 22 1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

Hi, I have a multi-isp configuration both on ppp interfaces. As one of them is 32Mbit/s and the other is 8Mbit/s , I have a weight setting of 4 to 1 as in the following providers file entries: vdsl 1 0x10000 - ppp1 - track,balance=4 adsl 2 0x20000 - ppp0 - track,balance=1 I would also like to have fallback between them so that if one is

Hi! I have reprise try to resolve this problem, suspended from 17 dec 2005 I have try to apply the suggest of Jerry (see above). The problem still exist. See attach shorewall config, dump and tcpdump when I check to exit whit SSH from firewall... In the masq file is reported the last my attempt in order to resolve my problem, however I have test also the example reported in MultiISP.html, but