similar to: Bridging with Shorewall

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier

I am in the process of building a new machine to replace several older servers. I am considering running several virtual servers on one box, all linux for host and virtual machines using VirtualBox. Is it possible/advisable to configure shorewall on the host to act as a firewall for the virtual machines, each having one or more static public IP address? Any pointers, suggestions and/or

On 19 Jul 2015, at 17:32, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 19 Jul 2015, at 01:44, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > ... >> Hm, strangely enough, this version of the script does not go further than the Phase 2 installation, and does not run any tests? This used to work fine for the release_36 branch. >> >> I think it is

I have read everything I can find in the docs and faqs about this, and I feel there must just be some simple thing I''m not doing, but I''m stumped. Two interfaces, eth0 and eth1.  eth1 is the WAN connection to the upstream provider, and has a single IP and the default gateway.  Connection uses bgp. eth0 is the LAN interface, and has multiple IP addresses, private (ie., 10.0.2.x)

Hi All! Been quite a few years and lots of water under the bridge but here I am back! I have a customer that has now decided they need a bit more bandwidth over and above their fixed line! They are not in a good area for ADSL because of copper theft and being a bit to far from the closest DSLAM! They have installed a wireless link and I have made certain that put it behind my simple iptables

Hi, I am trying to get L2TP roadwarrior VPN working from http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#RW-L2TP but i am making a mistake somewhere, appreciate a fresh set of eyes to help. I have the following interfaces: ppp0 - interneteth0 - local networkrem - client openvpnl2tp - ppp for lt2p clients I am getting the following error logged when trying to connect into the server with L2TP from a remote

Hello Everyone, We have a standalone Debian Wheezy box for game/web/VoIP server. My problem is that somehow the inbound traffic is limited to 4kbit/s to 8kbit/s by default whereas it''s set to 3*full/10 with 9*full/10 ceiling. The interface is set to 100Mbit/sec and it actually gives that performance with the corresponding outbound traffic limits. Naturally when I stop shorewall this

Dear WizaRds, I am struggling with the use of twophase in package survey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........

''rake rails:update'' is causing the below error for me when trying to upgrade my application. I''ve scowered Google and didn''t find much, has anyone else had this problem and solved it? C:\@cs\phase2>rake rails:update --trace (in C:/@cs/phase2) rake aborted! Don''t know how to build task ''rails:update''

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Hi, We have an upcoming project to migrate Samba first into a new Hardware then the AD migration. Our hardware is old and we need to migrate. Please allow me to explain the current setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 14.04 running Samba 4.0.0. Even though it is running Samba 4, we are using configs from Samba3. - Roles: DC, DNS , DHCP and Shares - Database: TDB - DNS: BIND9 - Clients: Mix of

I've noticed that when a Windows computer that is in my domain connects to my WPA-Enterprise wifi it first attempts to authenticate with the SSID using the domain member's machine account, instead of prompting the user to enter their own credentials. Has anyone ever tried to do this with a Linux domain member? For example, my linux domain member laptop uses Network Manager as the GUI,

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3

This is my code i don't understand the error message: library(rgenoud) rm(list=ls()) set.seed(666) ######################################################### # As a first step, it is assumed that all input parameters are independent of ageing : ######################################################### InputDim <-20 # Max number of ageings in the inputs CPIRate <- rep(0.02 , InputDim ) #

Hello Guys I have problem with internet bank. I have 2 Internet links balancing mode, thus the bank is charging connection down. I tried to force Internet traffic (port 80 and 443) for only a link, however it did not work. How do I make a setting to force the connection to these ports for a specific link. Note: I can not use the file as route_rules have neither the source IP (ltsp) nor of

Hi sir, I have built the test suits in following steps: 0. $cd LLVM_GCC_DIR; $gunzip --stdout llvm-gcc-4.2-*version*-* platform*.tar.gz | tar -xvf - 1. $cd SRC_DIR/llvm-2.8/projects 2. $svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk test-suite 3.$cd OBJ_DIR; 4. $SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols

On 19 Jul 2015, at 00:17, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 17 Jul 2015, at 01:09, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >>> On 17 Jul 2015, at 00:31, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear