similar to: kvm with bridged network

Hi, I have installed CentOS 6.2 x86_64 and KVM/Qemu and I have some troubles with network. The first case: ----------------- The configuration is: - CentOS 6.2 (hardware machine) has one Ethernet interface with static IP address (eth0). - Virtual machine has bridge network interface with eth0 interface on CentOS 6.2. This bridge is created using wizard integrated with virt-manager. - Bridge

In the Redhat EL6 virtualization guide ( http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/sect-Virtualization-Network_Configuration-Bridged_networking_with_libvirt.html ) I read this: # Configure iptables Configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge. # iptables -I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT # service iptables

I'm having trouble with the bridged network setup. I'm new to kvm, but I got a window xp sp2 guest set up without trouble a few days ago. I followed the instructions in the RH virtualization guide, and all was fine until I had to reboot the host machine a few days later. Then, I lost networking altogether on the host machine. I lost track of all the things I tried, but finally got

With NM_Controlled=No in the ifcfg file, NM applet shows "Not Managed", so the ifcfg file is being read. What is the extent of interaction of NetworkManager with ifcfg files is unknown....very little information on the net. Seems Network Manager is still mostly unplublished compared to other utilities. Any pointers to literature on this or macro architecture of NM would be appreciated,

Hi all, Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge named br0. Searching the web I only found about creating a file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to explicitely list what ports will be bridged. Where is it configured? Thank you. -- RMA.

Hi, In RHEL5/6 we have been able to create bridges on our hyper-visor of a number of vlans (eg. em1 -> em1.483 -> br483) We would be able to see this br483 in the virt-manager drop down network choice at the end of creating a new host. On RHEL7 we are not using NetworkManager per the documentation[0] for bridges (and because it is not worth it). So a RHEL7 virt-manager (0.10.0) when

If I have dhcpd running on my machine, and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine.... How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use. Thanks, Jerry

Hello All: I'll ask this in the virt list later if this is not the appropriate forum... Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (53 on UDP/TCP) and still being unable to access, I was able to connect immediately after allowing those ports on the

On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdukes at palmettoshopper.com wrote: > I have one of those free domains/DNS from no-ip.com, centos7vm.ddns.net > I plan to use as the host name. > > I want to be able to access this VM from the internet. ... > This is what I was seeing. Either it lands on the DSL router's login > page or the host's website. If you only have one address, you'll

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:47 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdukes at palmettoshopper.com wrote: > > I have one of those free domains/DNS from

Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one, I created in /home/kvm, but deleted it as well when I couldn't access it FROM the

I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging for help..lol http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html This shows a working effort of bonded eths, bridged into a vm, and a few other things. The only missing thing is something on the host that ends up putting the VM internet connection into some kind of limbo. Whether it is hardware related, bug related, libvirt nat

Hello with XEN 3.4.x antispoof=yes works on a bridge setup. I am using this line in xend-config.sxp (network-script ''network-bridge antispoof=yes'') It creates this under IPTABLES FORWARD chain: ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in peth0 Under XEN 4.0.1 it is not working, it does not create a IPTABLES rule. Customers can

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u5 Severity: important Tags: patch security -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),

Hi, I'm not sure but I think I suffer under the same problem with a bit different setup with squeeze testing and xen 4.0rc5. In fact I'm using bridges in the dom0 and the connections to the domU get lost sporadically. In don't see where's a solution to the problem... Is it now a bug? When it's an iptables bug, where's the corresponding bug in the iptables bugtracker

Problem still not solved, or any idea whats wrong. here are some msgs: device vif1.0 entered promiscuous mode alloc irq_desc for 1246 on node 0 alloc kstat_irqs on node 0 brI: port 2(vif1.0) entering learning state device vif1.1 entered promiscuous mode brE: port 2(vif1.1) entering learning state physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for

Currently using physdev on a bridge to try and isolate certain paths across and to the bridge. It all works except when trying to stop the flow in one direction on the FORWARD chain?? Can someone please help?? Below is the testing done so far. eth1 <---> BRIDGE <---> eth0 # Block (eth0 ---> eth1) - blocks both directions and not just one?? iptables -A FORWARD -m physdev

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.4.2-2 Severity: important The network setup uses not longer supported iptables operations: | physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. -- Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped. -- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate

Hi folks, in 2.4 kernels, device matching for bridged packets was done with iptables -i/-o. Since 2.6, I was used to use -m physdev here. In 2.6.18, This seems to be more complicated. At least the filter/INPUT chain now doesn't match with -m physdev --physdev-in anymore, but FORWARD and OUTPUT does. I also read the note that -m phydev is now deprecated for non-bridged traffic. Does this

Hello list, I''m using xen2.6 with a 2.6.11 kernel my config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-xenU" memory = 1280 name = "s51" nics=1 vif = [ ''ip=82.149.232.51,mac=00:E0:81:29:71:3D'' ] disk = [ ''file:/home/xen/51/diskimage,sda1,w'', ''file:/home/xen/51/swapimage,sda2,w'',