similar to: IFB0 throughput 3-4% lower than expected

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w

connection will remain a TCP connection unless it is broken and restarted. Usually if I stop the client and wait for about 30 seconds to reconnect, there is a much greater chance that the MTU probes work fine, and in about 30 seconds MTU is fixed to 1416. Every time when the MTU probing fails, I see latency between 700 - 1000 ms with 32 byte pings over a LAN. Every time when the MTU probing does

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc ''that is also below''. The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were run at the same time. The links are policed at 6.0M ''by our provider''. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a prio qdisc should''nt the iperf run with a tos of b8 have

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

would like some input on this one please. Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other. Both servers have the following setup: CentOS 5.5 x64 XEN 1GB NIC's 7200rpm SATA HDD's The hardware configuration can't change, I need to use these servers as they are. They are both used in production

Hi all, I set up a samba server into Debian 3.2.0-4-amd64. This runs as guest OS into VirtualBox machine over OS X host OS. Connection seems pretty good: $ iperf -s ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 192.168.0.21 port 5001

2.4.18 kernel) using 3 x 60GB WD 7200 IDE drives on a 7500-4 controller I could get peak I/O of 452 MBytes/sec, and a sustainable I/O rate of over 100 MBytes/sec. That is not exactly a 'dunno' performance situation. These tests were done using dbench and RAID5. Let's get that right: 100 MBytes/sec == 800 Mbits/sec, which is just a tad over 100 Mbits/sec (the bottleneck if you use

Hi, I am seeing a performance degradation while using libvirt to start my vm (kvm). vm is fedora 12 and host is also fedora 12, both with 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686. Here are the statistics from iperf : >From VM: [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 199 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec >From host : [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 331 MBytes 92.6 Mbits/sec libvirt command as seen from ps output : /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -S -M

Hi everybody. I''m receiving this error message: Action 4 device ifb0 ifindex 7 when I issue this command: tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \ match u32 0 0 action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0 I''m using linux 2.6.19-rc6 with tc version ss061002 Hints?

Hi, I have just started to work with Xen and have a question regarding the expected network throughput. Here is my configuration: Processor: 2.8 GHz Intel Celeron (Socket 775) Motherboard: Gigabyte 8I865GVMF-775 Memory: 1.5 GB Basic system: Kubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake Xen version: 3.02 (Latest 3.0 stable download) I get the following iperf results: Src Dest Throughput Dom0 Dom0

Hi, I'm having some weird problem with the setup of the QoS on a bridged network. As the docs states, outbound/inbound average speed should be expressed in KBps (KBytes per second) but in order to get a maximum speed of 10Mbps (megabits per second) surprising enough I have to use 2560 on the guest (not 1280 as expected). Using 1280 units I get a speed og 5Mbps. I'm aware of peak and

Hi, I'm having some weird problem with the setup of the QoS on a bridged network. As the docs states, outbound/inbound average speed should be expressed in KBps (KBytes per second) but in order to get a maximum speed of 10Mbps (megabits per second) surprising enough I have to use 2560 on the guest (not 1280 as expected). Using 1280 units I get a speed og 5Mbps. I'm aware of peak and

Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing significant performance degradation problems (from 100Mb/s down to 1Mb/s in the worst case) and I'm not sure how to fix this. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, iperf reports ~100Mb/s and rsync reports ~1Mb/s: $ iperf -c 91.224.149.132

I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is

Hello list, I have two differents installation Xen Hypervisor on two identical physical server, on the same switch : The problem is on my new server (Xen 4.0.1 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.24), I have bad performance on bandwidth I have test with a files copy and "iperf". Result iperf average: Transfert Bandwidth XEN-A -> Windows

Hi, I want to do some analysis of NTOP data. Currently I have installed NTOP on Centos 5.1 and I am able to see some network data being graphed. But there is no documentation given whether NTOP is showing Network Throughput in MBytes or MBits for ex I am getting Throughput Min: 163.7k , Max: 3.0 M and Last 859.4k and there are some options like anomalia, upper,lower and trend (30min). Under

Hi, I have some network problems with my DomUs (etch) on a debian etch running xen 3.0.3. The domain0 is a DL360 G5 with tg3 network card If i download something from outside my dom0 box to a domU, i get this network rate: ~865kbits ... and it must be ~ 10Mbits, i think. Doing some tests with iperf i get this: [ 4] local outside_server port 5001 connected with _domU_ port 54889 [ 4]

G''Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to work, though, do I have to account for the ATM overhead in the small VOIP packets by defining my

Hello everybody. We had a Samba 3.024 on a old computer. It's disks begun to fail and we decided to replace the computer with a new one. I installed a Lenny and a Samba 3.2.5. I've two problems of slowness : * If I open a large pdf ( around 5 Mbytes ) on any computer and if I want to print it ( directly from the computer to the printer, we do not use Samba as a print server )

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and