similar to: Re: Problem release that does not work

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.

Hi everybody. I''m trying to configure shorewall folowing this manual: http://www.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html But with shorewall check it tells me thah: Checking /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Unknown zone (dmz) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 16) How can I define it in the zone file? thanks for the help. best regards, Santiago.

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

Hi There, Due to shortage computer, I need to install Apache to my Shorewall box (192.168.1.1) But the real web server is on another box (192.168.1.2) I tried to put rule: DNAT net loc:192.168.168.1 tcp 80 But everytime www connection coming in, it will hit my shorewall Any solution? Cheer Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how:

4.5.4 Beta 3 is now available for testing. I apologize for the back-to-back Betas but I guess it''s better to find these problems during the Beta period rather than later. Problems corrected: 1) This release includes all defect repairs from Shorewall 4.5.3.1. 2) When EXPORTMODULES=No in shorewall.conf, the following errors were issued: /usr/share/shorewall/modules: line 19:

4.5.4 Beta 3 is now available for testing. I apologize for the back-to-back Betas but I guess it''s better to find these problems during the Beta period rather than later. Problems corrected: 1) This release includes all defect repairs from Shorewall 4.5.3.1. 2) When EXPORTMODULES=No in shorewall.conf, the following errors were issued: /usr/share/shorewall/modules: line 19:

Hi, In log I get: ----------------------------------------------------------- Sep 30 16:19:03 host kernel: Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=ip1 DST=ip2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=118 ID=27279 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=51501 DPT=25 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Even in /etc/shorewall/rules I have

Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \

Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

Beta 1 is now availablew for testing. Problems Corrected: 1) Previously, the Shorewall and Shorewall6 install.sh scripts did two things wrong with respect to the /etc/shorewall[6]/routes file: - The existing file was unconditionally removed. - A skeleton file was not installed when SPARSE was not set in the shorewallrc file. Additionally, the installer would remove

Beta 1 is now availablew for testing. Problems Corrected: 1) Previously, the Shorewall and Shorewall6 install.sh scripts did two things wrong with respect to the /etc/shorewall[6]/routes file: - The existing file was unconditionally removed. - A skeleton file was not installed when SPARSE was not set in the shorewallrc file. Additionally, the installer would remove

Hi everyone! First of all, sorry about my bad English and the e-mails extension. I need some help to implement a VPN connection using shorewall and openswan as IPSec Tunnel. My network map: CLIENT VPN APPLIANCE --> +++INTERNET+++ --> FIREWALL --> OPENSWAN SERVER (DMZ) I have two VPN connections with two different subnets to the other end. The two of then are correctly established.

Dear All, I try to upgrade, my old shorewall from 4.4.13-3 to 4.5.2.3-1 on CentOS, after upgrade i can''t start shorewall with this message: "/Shorewall: Address Ranges require the Multiple Match capability in your kernel and iptables/" I try to search on the net about this, but no still no light. Somebody can help me? Great appreciate for any help. Regards,

I''m trying to use my VPS server (single interface of course) as somewhat of a VPN gateway to my other location (which is not accessible directly from some places) where the openvpn server is running, and am kind of lost as to what to try next. I tried a redirect rule, but apparently shorewall didn''t like that (it just failed to start). I tried adding the rules via

I would like to dnat certain protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, SSH) to the contents of an ipset (lan:+serviceshost or similar) where the ipset is ensured to contain only one host, but can be changed dynamically when services are in maintenance mode and go to the "services are down" message on another server. Will this work, or am I barking up a fish here?

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

Hi, i am using squid as a transparent proxy. i have added this 3 lines to my rules file ACCEPT $FW net tcp www ACCEPT loc $FW tcp 8080 REDIRECT loc 8080 tcp www - !192.168.100.2 i want to limit the number of connection that are made from every pc on the network to the proxy server. if i change the 2nd rule to ACCEPT loc $FW tcp 8080