similar to: NAT-PMP and Shorewall

fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) >

Hello In case Asterisk is used in a private LAN behind a firewall while allowing remote SIP clients to connect from the Net, we must open UDP5060 for SIP and a range of UDP ports (as set in rtp.conf) so let incoming voice packets. Provided the user doesn't have access to the firewall (eg. corporate or hotel), and the firewall doesn't allow dynamic port opening through UPnP or NAT-PMP...

I'm looking at buying a NORCO DS-1220 and it comes with a NORCO 4618 PCI-X card (4 port eSATA, with a port multiplier on the card or the chassis). I've been trying to pin down whether or not CentOS will see all 12 drives, and I haven't seen anything that is definitive. I see that the kernel module sata_sil24 supports the SiI3124 chip on the NORCO 4618 card, but I haven't found

Hi Guus, Unfortunately, I often notice that even with the advanced UDP hole punching mechanisms that tinc uses, I still come across cases on my network where two nodes behind NATs cannot talk to each other because one of the nodes is behind a "strict" NAT that won't use consistent source ports for UDP packets that are sent to different destination addresses. More formally, this

On 11 November 2015 at 21:57, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote: > it is entirely possible to write code that uses threads on Win32 and forks > on POSIX by abstracting the communication bits generically. Signalling could > work over pipes on both. > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365152(v=vs.85).aspx Hum... yes of course, but I

On 12 November 2015 at 21:29, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Etienne Dechamps wrote: >> According to an online NAT check service, around 50% of NATs in the >> wild have this problem, making this a very real issue: >> http://nattest.net.in.tum.de/results.php > > Are you referring to port restricted NAT in the

Hello; we are looking to replace our current PBX with a *-box; it is connected to ONE ppp isdn connection that is terminated by the NC. We got on this box 4 msn's configured. currently we are working with pstn fxo's behind the PBX; it works but we can't use the CSID information behind it. We want to migrate and keep the MSN's to decide routing in combination with the CID.

I haven't seen this in the options, and have been unsuccessful in trying it... Is there any way to set oggenc to accept data (file) input from stdin? basically do a raw PCM stream from CDParanoia -> oggenc without an intermediary file. Thanks! --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send

Hi All, We've got msidn configured: Port 1: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1 (Euro ISDN) -> childcnt: 2 -------- mISDN_close: fid(3) isize(131072) inbuf(0x8fd5060) irp(0x8fd5060) iend(0x8fd5060) and running on Asterisk 1.4.21.2: pbx*CLI> misdn show stacks BEGIN STACK_LIST: * Port 1 Type TE Prot. PMP L2Link UP L1Link:UP Blocked:0 Debug:0

As Shorewall reaches maturity, it seems unlikely that the pace of development typical of the past 9 years will be sustained. Over that time, major releases have occurred approximately once per year; the last major release (4.4) was in August 2009. I do not currently have an active 4.5 development branch so it is very unlikely that we will see a 4.6 release this year. Going forward, I would

As Shorewall reaches maturity, it seems unlikely that the pace of development typical of the past 9 years will be sustained. Over that time, major releases have occurred approximately once per year; the last major release (4.4) was in August 2009. I do not currently have an active 4.5 development branch so it is very unlikely that we will see a 4.6 release this year. Going forward, I would

Proprietary by open source (sounds like a oxymoron) I am looking at doing a project that well use theora/vorbis/Dirac I am expecting to get why cant it play on my ipod/PMP? I am expecting to get you must be using some proprietary format? tom_a_sparks __________________________________________________________________________________ Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to

Forget about my part to nat file. I was wrong. Try my masq configuration. _____ Von: Michael Weickel - iQom Business Services GmbH [mailto:mw@iqom.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2010 00:17 An: ''Shorewall Users'' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] NAT Issue Try 1.1.1.198 eth0 172.16.1.23 no no INTERFACE - interfacelist[:[digit]] Interfacees that

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote: > I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel > chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated > for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine > instructions, but I'm most likely just doing

Hello All, I¹ve installed the vanilla shorewall F12, I¹ve got it installed on a couple of other servers with no problems. no matter how I define the zones and interfaces, shorewall logs and allows, rejects or drops only traffic to world. ACCEPT:info net:<myip>/32 $FW icmp Shorewall:world2fw:REJECT:IN=br0 ACCEPT:info world:<myip>/32 $FW icmp

Hrm. This problem shouldn't be target specific. I am pretty sure prologue / epilogue inserter aligns stack correctly if there are stack objects with greater than default stack alignment requirement. Seems to be the initial alloca() instruction should specify 16 byte alignment? Evan On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote:

Hola LLVMers, I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine instructions, but I'm most likely just doing something wrong and I'm hoping you can set me in

Hi Chuck! On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Hola LLVMers, > > > > I’m looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the > Intel chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I’ve started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code > generated for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some > wonky

Hi, I know this is slightly off topic but I figured the knowlege here is probably the best on the subject.. I want to setup remote offices with 4 to 6 SIP phones (SNOM 200) using ADSL and the internet to connect to the Asterisk box.. These phone will be behind an ADSL router using NAT... I don't want to setup another Asterisk system in each office so IAX is not an option.. I could use

Hi, I have a Linux Box to share a internet connection with NAT: | ISP | | Router | +---------------+ 200.36.107.137/32 | | | 200.36.107.138/32 +---------------+ | Linux | | router | +---------------+ 192.168.1.254/24 | | +---- host 1 192.168.1.1/24 | +---- host 2 192.168.1.2/24 | +---- ... | +---- host n