similar to: snat

I''m working on setting up a new router/server/etc. box. I''m using Proxmox as the base system (Debian Lenny basically). I''m trying to figure out the right way to configure Shorewall on it. I''ve looked at some of the bridging info but they seem to all be talking about single-interface setups. Could someone look over my setup and give me some input into the

I have this rule in place: -------------------------------------- DNAT net dmz:10.0.0.7 tcp 80,443 - 94.23.242.44 -------------------------------------- When I change this policy: -------------------------------------- net dmz DROP -------------------------------------- to: -------------------------------------- net dmz DROP info

Hi all. I have currently an OpenVZ server: uname -a Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8 19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.2 (Final) lspci | grep -i eth 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 03) cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts

Hi everybody. I''m trying to configure shorewall folowing this manual: http://www.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html But with shorewall check it tells me thah: Checking /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Unknown zone (dmz) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 16) How can I define it in the zone file? thanks for the help. best regards, Santiago.

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

Hi all, I have a question about a multi-homed Samba file server and interoperability with AD. It's a bit complicated, so please bear with me. I've been running Samba 4.11.6 as an AD server (two DCs) for a while (in RFC2307 mode) in a mixed Windows/Linux environment. I have a server running Proxmox (Debian) with Samba 4.9.5 and it is sharing my huge ZFS volume via Samba to Windows

Hello, When I use a standard Redhat kernel, it's ok. Everything's working right. That the Linux bridge configuration does not work afer I upgraded the kernel to 2.6.33.2. Why? [root at node78 ~]# cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m [root at node78 ~]# uname -a Linux node78 2.6.33.2 #1 SMP Wed Apr 14 10:10:29 CST 2010 x86_64

I can’t seem to find info about layer 2 tinc tap interface bridge with local physical nic. I have successfully created two nodes configuration with tinc acting as switch. My problem is ethernet packets only flow between two nodes and not to hosts on bridged nic. Example: Server 1 - eth0 bridged with tinc tap device, then bridge gets IP via dhcp server on physical nic subnet. Server 2 - local

I''m working on shorewall_setup_guide.htm -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hi ! I have setup a complete shorewall now with DMZ, and Private zones and masq, rules, port-forwarding etc. worx like expected. BUT I have a wish to use a couple of more public IP''s and relate those to inernal servers on the DMZ zone and i am now so confused about it. I have searched this archive for SNAT port allow Setup: 3 public adresses on the WAN nic. lets call them 80.80.80.80 -

Hi All, I am using Speex for encoding/decoding the audio stream for my streaming application. I have used almost the same code In the sampleenc.c and sampledec.c, except that I have used The buffers from the mic as input for encoder and encoded audio As input for decoder, instead of files input. My Problem is the audio played on the receiving side after decoding Is only a "hush" or it

Hi all! I''ve set up a Linux box with shorewall doing proxy arp as per http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm#ProxyARP the 5.2 (non routed) example. Everything is working great except for one thing, and that leads me to my question: is there a conflict between proxy arp and pptp? I''ve set the apropriate ACCEPT rules to allow tcp port 1723 and protocol 47 to the host

I''ve set up shorewall with the two-interface mode. pc #1 eth1 ---> ppp0 ---> Internet eth1: 10.10.10.254 eth0: 10.10.10.1 > via a crossover cable pc #2 eth0: 10.10.10.2 (gateway=10.10.10.254) I am able to surf the net with pc #1, but pc #2 is completely cut off from pc #1 and the net. I am also unable to ping from and to pc #2.

Hello, I''m new to shorewall and ipsets but have experience on low level iptables rules. I read already the following documentation: http://www.shorewall.net/Introduction.html http://www.shorewall.net/three-interface.htm http://www.shorewall.net/GettingStarted.html http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm

Hi to everybody, I write because I have just configure a shorewall to be used as firewall, proxy(with squid) and gateway to 2 internet connections, and it looks to work properly but now I''d like to add a new feature: I would to redirect some specific traffic (emule''s one) only to one of those links. This is my diagram:

Hi, My Samba 4.1.x server is connected to two networks, one in the 192.168.* range (wired) and one in the 10.* range (wifi). The clients on either network normally cannot reach each other. I noticed Samba hands out (eg: for dcname.company.net) it's IP's from both ranges to clients on both sides. So the 192.168.* clients get two A records: 192.168.1.1 & 10.0.0.2. I noticed that,

Hi! I''ve been searching the net for information about this topic, but I can''t find anything relevant to my problem or I don''t understand the answer completely. Please enlighten me... :-) I''m trying to replace a Cisco PIX firewall with a Linux Shorewall box. Today the users behind the Cisco FW is on a NAT-network and in the same network there are a couple of

Hello all, I must admit that I am new to the Linux/PXE world, and so, am still learning a lot. I am currently in the 2nd semester of a senior project at Weber State University in Utah, trying like mad to get a diskless Beowulf Cluster up and running. I was given a grant to purchase 4 nodes running this equipment: Pentium D dual core Processor MSI 965 Motherboard Intel Pro/1000 GT PCI adapter

Hi, I'm trying to create a snapshot from a KVM VM: # virsh snapshot-create one-5 error: unsupported configuration: internal checkpoints require at least one disk to be selected for snapshot How can I debug this error message and what does it mean? Some system information: * Ubuntu 13.04 64Bit * virsh --version: 1.0.2 * The XML of the VM is below Thanks for all help... Cheers, Tobias

Hi, I hope some of you have been in a similar situation and can shed some light on this: I have a VPN connection to a Samba 4.1.4 server and when I use Word 2010 on a W7 client to open an existing file I often get the following error: "document.docx has been locked for editing by another user." I should clarify that the document is not in use by anyone (confirmed by smbstatus), and