similar to: Shorewall dual NIC and asterisk

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

Dear tinc community, I am using tinc in switch mode. I have three nodes. Two nodes reside on routers, vpn-eth is bridged with internal lan, each router has several machines connected to it's internal lan. Third node is the roadwarrior - "endpoint" linux PC. When the roadwarrior is off - everything works perfectly, machines on both sides can communicate without a problem in any

For anyone to answer that clearly, we''d need a bit more information. Firstly, what is connected to router1 and router2? In other words, does the router box you want to use have enough ports (and of the right type) to actually handle all of the connections? Secondly, can we assume that you have enough access to the box you want to use to be able to install the software and configure it?

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24) Router2: eth0 - Internet

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set

So this is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of

Hello, please excuse the length of my question, and I hope that this is an appropriate place to ask. I have a workstation that has two interfaces connected to two private networks, 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24, each of which has a separate masquerading gateway to the internet, something like as follows: +-----------> to internet | router0

Thanks Jose, I found the key in the routing table of Router2; it had bad entries for the farest subnets (didn't have the 'via' commands...). Thanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter! :-) Bye, Mauro -----Messaggio

I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is this: There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

On 10/12/2015 10:03 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/12/2015 06:23 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I expect to see the second output upon reboot. > > Thanks, that's a lot more clear. Weird, though. Does /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 specify a "ZONE="? Are you using the "network" or the "NetworkManager" service? >

Hi folks, I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected to 2 upstream routers. I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using ftfw procotol). That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

First, I'd like to configure my system to forward ip, to act as a gateway for my network. I've always used a script during startup to do this: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${UPLINK} -j SNAT --to ${IP_NAT} This works fine, however I want this permanent so I don't have to run the script on startup. I have the firewall setup with SNAT

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 12:17 +0700, Matthew Hodgett wrote: > > As for the 169.254 issue I tried to search the archives but got nothing. > I then tried to search on generic words, nothing. I then tried some > really common words like ''help'', ''initiated'', ''masq'' - nothing. I think > the index might be corrupt because I get no

Hi. Im now decribeing my problem very clearly to see if anyone could help me. I have 3 (three) nics in my system. 1 is for my internet network - (eth1) 2 are for my 2 adsl lines that i use to connect to the internet (eth2 is my "master" adsl line) and (eth0 is my "slave" adsl line). I know that to make redundance work ill have to setup the ip route and ip rule in my

Hi I set-up a gre tunnel between two linux boxes. A short diagram is like this lan1 -> router1 ----- router2 <- lan2 The tunnel works fine, i can ping from lan1 to lan2 but the problem is the speed between lan1 and lan2 is lower than it supposed to be If i log in to router1 and transfer something from router2 or lan2 it is working at maximum speed, 1024kbits/s. The problem is if i log in

Hello, The setup is : Asterisk ------<www> ------- Router1---------<LAN> --------- SIP Phones | | |------------------<pstn>----------Router2------------| (I hope the sketch is understandable. If not, it could be summarized with : "SIP hardphones on a given LAN are connected to an Asterisk server through 2