similar to: Connections

Hi, Is it possible to start a worker with job_key and then ask_status of that specific worker with the job_key? MiddleMan.ask_work(:worker => :auth_worker, :job_key=>''1'', :worker_method => :auth) and then MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :auth_worker, :job_key=>''1'') >From my testing of the new backgroundrb, asking status using job key

I''m trying to run a single worker that could perform a periodic task for a given user. >From a controller, I imagine something like: def start_job MiddleMan.ask_work(:worker => :foo_worker, :worker_method => :perform_task, :data => { :user_id = current_user.id }) end def check_job @status = MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :foo_worker)[current_user.id] end

Hey all, Been reading through all the old posts (and the docs) to familiarize myself but I still feel a bit lost. I''m on trunk and am having a bit of a hard time knowing where to start with the particular I''m trying to solve. So far, I''ve downloaded backgroundrb, done the basic rails setup, created my worker and started it using `script/backgroundrb start`.

I have a worker which wants to delete itself after it finishes its work- how can it do that? Best Regards, Danny Burkes

If I have a worker and everything set up and I call: MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :foo_worker) MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :foo_worker) MiddleMan.ask_status(:worker => :foo_worker) three times in quick succession. Will the tasks be queued up and executed as the previous one finishes? Or is this going to ignore the 2 bottom requests? How does this work? Do I absolutely need to

Hi, I have a page were users can start jobs that may take several hours to run. BackgrounDrb is perfect for me and seems to be working well most of the time but some times I have the following problem: My worker is set up like this: class UploadWorker < BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker set_worker_name :upload_worker set_no_auto_load(true) def create(args = nil ) file = args[:file]

I''m working on upgrading my app to the latest version of backgroundrb. Everything went find until I tried to execute my tasks. Here is my simple worker for testing: class MscWorker < BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker set_worker_name :msc_worker def create(args = nil) # this method is called, when worker is loaded for the first time end # Send a message to everyone def

Anyone have a a good monit config section for bgrb? I''m thinking something like this: check process backgroundrb with pidfile /var/www/apps/foo/current/log/backgroundrb.pid start program = "/var/www/apps/foo/current/script/backgroundrb start" stop program = "/var/www/apps/foo/current/script/backgroundrb stop" if failed host 127.0.0.1 port 2000 then restart

I''m running the latest from svn (rev 285). I''ve been having a problem launching a process repeatedly. What happens is that I get a debug message "some read error" and then the worker refuses to run again. I''ve stripped my worker down to just doing a puts and it still happens. Like the other threads I want to launch my workers as needed, however I get the

Hi Folks, BackgrounDRb is a Ruby job server and scheduler. Its main intent is to be used with Ruby on Rails applications for offloading long-running tasks. Since a Rails application blocks while serving a request it is best to move long-running tasks off into a background process that is divorced from http request/response cycle. This new release of BackgrounDRb is also modular and can be used

I''ve been using backgroundrb since back in March 2007 or so. It''s been working mostly OK for me, but since the old version doesn''t seem to work out of the box with rails 2.0 for me, I decided to test out the latest version. So, I''m looking at the scheduling, and trying to figure out the best option for what I want to do. What I have is a set of workers that

Hi, A pre-release version of backgroundrb is available now from svn. Download it from here: http://svn.devjavu.com/backgroundrb/branches/version099/ Since this release marks significant migration from existing practices, i intend to keep trunk untouched for a while. There are no install scripts, but you should copy "backgroundrb" file from script directory of plugin to script

When I call ask_status on a worker that has not been started I get and exception of type BackgrounDRb::BdrbConnError, which is fine. I can deal with that, but I also find that the backgroundrb process dies as well. The scenario is simple: Call ask_status on a worker that is not auto loaded. I used a job_key, in case that makes a difference. -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi, I''ve been using bdrb for a while and just recently found the need to use the ask_status/register_status functionality of my worker. This is the error I get whenever the register_status method is encountered: ...lib/workers/session_worker.rb:10:in `create'': undefined method `register_status'' for #<SessionWorker:0xb6e7d52c> (NoMethodError) from

Hi, pardon if this is a duplicate mail, I forgot to click the subscription link the first time around. I''ve been using backgroundrb for a while now (older version) and I''ve had so many headaches because of it that I began looking for a replacement technology. And then I saw the new and shiny backgroundrb website, looking good! Initially I used the version maintained by

Hi there, Amazing changes! I really like what you''ve done with BackgrounDRb and I hope you continue developing it, since it was definitely somewhat languishing before. One small error stuck out for me, though. The create method requires an argument even if one isn''t used, such that if you have: def create @results = Hash.new end The server throws an error about trying to

Hello all, I have some good news to announce. I have made some changes to a local copy of BackgrounDRb 1.0.3 (actually most of the changes were in Packet 0.1.5) and I''ve got it working on Windows. From what I''ve read, this is the first time it''s worked on Windows in a year and a half, since 0.2 was released. In my research I can see that a number of people have asked

Hemant We''ve continued testing our application with backgroundrb and found a couple of other problems when transfering large amounts of data. Both of these problems are still present in the github version of code. The first problem is an exception in the Marshal.load call in the receive_data method in the Packet::MetaPimp class. The root cause is in the BinParser module, in the arm of

I just put the finishing touches on Substruct v0.06. As always, you can check out a demo over at http://substruct.subimage.com/ What''s new? Version 0.6 --------------------------------------- Added: - Tagging for products - Maintenance of product tags - Automatic image thumbnail / small size creation via RMagick Updated: - Better shopping cart experience with AJAX cart

Sorry for attaching patches in emails to the mailing list, but I''m still unable to login to Devjavu for Backgroundrb (I''m able to login just fine for Merb''s Devjavu and submitted a ticket successfully). Anyway, I encountered a bug when trying to #ask_status of a worker before it''s run (or rather, before its result_hash has been set to something). Not sure why