similar to: Shorewall 4.4.0 Beta 3

Beta 4 is now ready for testing. http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.0-Beta4/ ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.0-Beta4/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N 4 . 4 . 0 Beta 4

The Shorewall team is pleased to announce the availability of Shorewall 4.2.10. Astute users will notice that the version of Shorewall-perl included in this release is 4.2.10.1. We corrected a problem which was discovered after the release was initially uploaded, and we wanted to avoid the confusion that would inevitabley result if we were to release a different set of code with the same version

Shorewall 4.3.11 is now available for testing. Much of what is in this release is below the surface. Many of the modules have been reorganized to provide for more readable code and to eliminate a lot of parameter passing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N 4 . 3 . 11

Hello, I am facing the problem that samba does not recognize my network interfaces: Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: [2007/06/29 12:21:59, 0] lib/interface.c:load_interfaces(225) Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: WARNING: no network interfaces found Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]: [2007/06/29 12:21:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(190) Jun 29 12:21:59 ebox nmbd[22377]:

Before I start, I don''t want to do ECMP or simple bonding ... I have multiple Internet connections available to multiple boxes on one of my networks. Box A connects to ISPs 1, 2 and 3 Box B connects to ISPs 1 and 4 Boxes A and B are both connected to each other and the rest of the network. 1) I would like to set up some dynamic routing in such a way that any given outgoing packet from

Thanks Anthony. I did it on the server, according to https://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/port+forwarding However after doing it, when running Asterisk I get the following message sudo asterisk -vvvvvvr No ethernet interface found for seeding global EID. You will have to set it manually. Unable to access the running directory (No such file or directory). Changing to '/' for compatibility.

I have a linux server with 3 public IPs, and I use SSH tunnelling to connect to each of them. Let's call them: 1.1.1.1 (venet0:0), 1.1.1.2 (venet0:1), 1.1.1.3 (venet0:2). When I tunnel using 1.1.1.1, outgoing IP for the public is: 1.1.1.1. But when I tunnel using 1.1.1.2 or 1.1.1.3, the outgoing IP for the public is still 1.1.1.1. I've been googling for days, and tried relevant channels

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

Hello All I installed shorewall 3.0.8 on Centos 4.3 with openvz.org kernel it work well i have in this Host 3 virtual servers (VPS) i can access from a VPS to the internet , and with NAt rule (Via Shorewall) i can access from Internet to the 3 VPS. i want that all the 3 VPS can communicate between them. i can''t do a tcp connection from a VPS to an other , in my shorewall log in the

Sirs, I am a newbe jumping to advance routing and traffic control. I work for one of the leading isp in kingdom of Nepal. My goal is to do bandwidth management for our lease line customer so that they could use their allocated bandwidth only. Bgp and ospf is implemented as a routing protocol. All routers are cisco routers. There are about 16 routers some are with highly danced ports. No Linux box

ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:46, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@rubenkerkhof.com>: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 4/9/19 11:35 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:10 PM Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 4/9/19 4:38 PM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless

Hello all, Some time before Christmas, a project was started. The task was to enhance an existing LiveCD solution with User-mode Linux. A number of requirements was stated, where the greatest challenge was to fit 10 virtual routers within an old no-name PC with only 256MB Ram. And the solution must still be run from a LiveCD. Thanks to Xen, the task was possible to complete. -But, what does it

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

My setup: LAN A | |-- Wireless-r1 --| |-- Wireless-r2 --| ..................| .................LAN B LAN A is my primary (external) LAN. LAN B is my wireless LAN. LAN A does iBGP and OSPF routing. Each wireless router does the following: 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN A 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN B 2 VLANs on LAN A 5 VLANs on LAN B UCARP on each wireless

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

Hello Anyone used Zebra routing daemon and created virtual routers before? Is it possible to run OSPF/BGP on each virtual server and get them to talk to each other? I''m new to Xen and I need to know... I will be trying this out in the coming days and I want to know about any pitfalls to avoid. -- Nonchalantly yours GobbledeGeek [Every thing but Gobbledegook.. !!]

Hi Everyone; Please find below a mail I sent to quagga mailing list, covering lartc/quagga issue. So far, I have no reply from them. I think that maybe you guys would have an idea about this. Thanks in advance ! Best, -----Forwarded Message----- Hi There, I''m new to quagga and to dynamic routing in general, so please forgive me if my question are foobar. I''m trying to

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE