similar to: multi-isp, dhcp provider and gateway type detect

While troubleshooting my MultiISP box, I suspect I might have found either a bug or an incompatibility with CentOS 5.2. In prog.header (function detect_dynamic_gateway), Shorewall tries to look for: /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-${1}.lease However (at least under CentOS 5 - unknown about other OSes), this should be: /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-${1}.leases (different path, and "leases"

Hello, I''m using shorewall-4.5.16 with centos5. The dhclient stores the lease information on the /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-<DEVICE>.leases file. The /var/lib/shorewall/firewall script has the function detect_dynamic_gateway that detects the gateway based on the leases file. The code in the function is: detect_dynamic_gateway() { # $1 = interface local interface

Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze. The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using $brctl addbr br-lan $brctl addif br-lan eth0.0 $brctl addif br-lan eth0.1 and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel

Greetings. I'm new to tinc, but have so far managed to get a couple laptops and a hosted server all connected. They're working as expected, running Tinc 1.1-pre11, which I compiled from source. Next I want to move on to adding my home router into the mix. My routers run OpenWRT. I don't have experience compiling anything from source for OpenWRT, but OpenWRT has Tinc 1.0.25

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, Sandy McArthur Jr wrote: > I use the Tinc 1.0 series since I don't want to support my > own packages. <snip> > I wrote most of http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.tinc and that is > what I still use. Since then . . . Ok. I think I'll start with the 1.0 series packages that are already out there and get them working. and on Tue, Jan 27, 2015,

Hey Saverio, I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. How do you plan to handle things with OpenSSL? tinc-1.1 from git should be able to compile without it (but will then only support the built-in algorithms). Depending

Hello, I received this pull request. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/2757/files As I wrote in the comments I am not sure that is the way to go. Packaging a software for a distribution is not just about software development. There are operational issues to be addressed. A lot of people use the tinc package and they expect they configs to survive a package update. Also they expect the

Hello, I have a UPS device connected (USB) to a Debian server, but I want to change it and connect to a OpenWRT router. I installed this packages: nut-server (2.6.5-2) nut-driver-blazer_usb (2.6.5-2) The problem is that I don't know where to configure it. Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device? Thanks for your help. Regards. -- Josu Lazkano

Hello to everybody, Sorry if my english isn?t very good. I need pass 802.1q through a VPN between two offices. I have mounted a WRT54GL, with OpenWRT firmware, conected to a switch trunk port in both offices. In the switch of the first office I have created five tagged VLANs and I need pass these VLAN to the second offices where it has created it too. Can I do this with Tinc in HUB/Switch

I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit it. On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: > Hey Saverio, > > I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm > currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the > new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. > > How do you

On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > The problem is that I don't know where to configure it. > > Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device? What version of OpenWRT? I haven't tried this myself, but it looks like recent versions of OpenWRT use UCI, which seems to generate configuration files (including those for NUT) from a unified configuration syntax.

I've built samba for an embedded mips platform. Since this is an embedded platform, it's possible that some critical file that samba needs is missing but stracing the daemons doesn't reveal anything strange. It's running 2.4.34 kernel. Samba is failing to find any interfaces. [2000/01/02 10:55:01, 3] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(759) Opening sockets 137 [2000/01/02 10:55:01, 10]

Hi There, Due to shortage computer, I need to install Apache to my Shorewall box (192.168.1.1) But the real web server is on another box (192.168.1.2) I tried to put rule: DNAT net loc:192.168.168.1 tcp 80 But everytime www connection coming in, it will hit my shorewall Any solution? Cheer Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how:

Hi, I have a suspicious problem with multiple uplinks configuration. First of all my configuration: 1) kernel 2.6.20.3 2) iptables 1.3.7 3) last iproute (for masked marks) All wan interfaces are bridged (stp disabled) in only one interface (wan0), all lan interfaces are bridged (stp enabled) in only one interface (zlan0). The wan0 bridge is to allow UPnP works. To allow related

I recompiled yet 2.6.19.1 kernel (using iptables with the same patches too). The configuration for this test is: 1) linux box with 2.6.19.1 kernel (SMP machine) with these patches/modules: a) l7-filter b) ipp2p c) connlimit d) set 2) 4 ethernet interfaces: a) 2 external (eth1 and eth3) interfaces with balanced links (as described in nato-howto) bridged as wan0

Guys, i know i saw this somewhere but i cant seem to locate that info now... Scenario: ............... I have a simple two interface firewall. The firewall machine also provides some services to the LAN and to the NET. What i would like to do is allow only a particular range of IPs frm the internet to access those services. What do i need to do with my ''rules'' file. Ideally

Hi, I have a multi-isp configuration both on ppp interfaces. As one of them is 32Mbit/s and the other is 8Mbit/s , I have a weight setting of 4 to 1 as in the following providers file entries: vdsl 1 0x10000 - ppp1 - track,balance=4 adsl 2 0x20000 - ppp0 - track,balance=1 I would also like to have fallback between them so that if one is

I'm having trouble figuring out how to make a bridge that does not block forwarding of packets when there is no receive channel in the same bridge. The reason I want to do this is that the return path is via another circuit. The two directions are on two different radios. I would think this would be like the response given to someone in July 2007 about setting a "hub" mode by

Hi, could anyone provides any example about the use of ip route command to force the use of one route using masks in the mark? The configuration is: 1 LAN (zlan0) iface N WAN (wan0 ... wanN) ifaces with static IPs and load balanced. iptables 1.3.7 kernel 2.6.19.2 iproute 2.6.19 I''m yet setting marks into packets for QoS and its working, I now want to set some bits (OR)

Hello I use DNSMasq on OpenWRT router, OpenWRT provides also DHCP. Another linux box works as PDC with Samba 4. Everything seems to be ok except .... Internal DNS. Whole Domain (60 machines) works ok but only Domain Controler created it's account in dns. How can i diagnose problem? Maybe it is fault of DHCP on OpenWRT and should switch to DHCP on samba box? Szymon