similar to: Polices, Rules and Configurations - No Success (#/etc/shorewall/policy)

Hi, I need a help... I''m a beginner with shorewall. I have two shorewall firewalls, each with a link. FW (a) - w/ openVPN eth0 = 192.168.150.5/24 eth1 = 192.168.200.5/24 eth2 = public IP eth3 = 192.168.120.5/24 tun240 = 10.240.255.1 /etc/shorewall/zones all zones declared as ipv4 /etc/shorewall/interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS tlm eth0

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Hello all: I''ve got a confusing issue. I had a working shorewall configuration (based on the two interface model) using DNAT for redirection to my HTTP server. The HTTP server is on my inside network (I know - bad juju, but one thing at a time). I changed my configuration this morning to use views in my BIND (named) configuration. Everyone outside the firewall is able to get in

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

Hi, I''m trying to use Shorewall (3.0.6) to accomplish what I thought was going to be fairly simple. Unfortunately, I can''t get the dmz to work correctly, and I''m getting martians logged against the interface at issue. Any help I could get would be greatly appreciated! A picture of my physical setup is attached. I have also attached a shorewall dump. To make a long

I have an ADSL router, a linux box with two NICS connected to the router and another PC connected to the router. I installed shorewall using the two interface method. I can ping and see the webserver on the linux box from the local network, but not from the internet. Sys info as follows: [root@wilma root]# shorewall version 1.4.6b [root@wilma root]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu

Hi, according to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space the bogons table is outdated... tha attached patch fixes that... (done against 2.0.1) -- Regards Thomas PS. please CC me as I''m not subscribed to the list -------------- next part -------------- --- usr/share/shorewall/bogons.old 2004-04-19 18:28:00.000000000 +0300 +++ usr/share/shorewall/bogons 2004-04-20

Hi, i connect to the internet over my eth4 interface using pppoe. The internet always comes on ppp0. I am trying to setup an L2TP/IPSEC VPN and i am reading http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#RW-L2TP I notice in the example the interfaces file is given as: #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net eth0 detect routefilter loc eth1

Hi all! I''m using shorewall 2.2.3 and I got a net device that seems to be a point-to-point device (that''s what ifconfig suggests): vpnlink Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd P-t-P:aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1300 Metric:1 RX

Hello colleagues, I am attempting to determine the nonlinear least-squares estimates of the nonlinear model parameters using nls. I have come across a common problem that R users have reported when I attempt to fit a particular 3-parameter nonlinear function to my dataset: Error in nls(r ~ tlm(a, N.fix, k, theta), data = tlm.data, start = list(a = a.st, : step factor 0.000488281

Greetings folks, I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module. Is connlimit included by default? I thought it is since performing # iptables -m connlimit --help returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables help info: <SNIP> connlimit v1.2.11 options: [!]

Shorewall 4.5.15 3 Interface setup em1 p3p1 p4p4 ppp0 Hi, Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1. When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer assigns an IP to em1. If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the interfaces, em1 gets an IP of 192.168.1.2. Then when I get

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857 Summary: ConnLimit unable to work properly Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

I''m attempting to setup Squid as shown on: http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#DMZ The firewall is a Bering 1.0 firewall running Shorewall 1.3.11, Red Hat 7.2 on the server in the DMZ. I''m not seeing the requests come in to the server using tcpdump. The server is 192.168.2.1 connecting to eth2 on the firewall, the local traffic I''m trying to

Hi, I am running OpenVPN where i have one central hub VPN server, and multiple spoke VPN clients. I can ping from each client to the server and each client to computers on the subnet which the server resides (192.168.2.0/24) so it works ok there. I cannot however, ping from one client to another client. I guess the packet path would go: clienta -> vpn -> shorewall/router -> vpn ->

Hi: According to http://www.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Interfaces there is one recommendation for internal interface but wireless Wireless Interface -- maclist,routefilter,tcpflags,detectnets,nosmurfs a recommendation for wired internal interface?(100 win32 clients) I use tcpflags,detectnets thanks

Hello all. First of all, please be a bit indulgent to my poor English :-). Second, this message is "kinda" BIG, so if you don''t like BIG messages, simply don''t read it :-). I''ve read http://shorewall.net/2.0/Shorewall_and_Routing.html and http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html, however I still a bit confused how to organize what I need :-). I''ve a

# iptables -m connlimit --help ......... connlimit v1.3.5 options: [!] --connlimit-above n match if the number of existing tcp connections is (not) above n --connlimit-mask n group hosts using mask ----------------------------------------- The library seems to exist also: /lib64/iptables/libipt_connlimit.so However, creating a rule that uses connlimit fails: #$IPTABLES -A