similar to: MultiWAN & Vlans

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

Hi, we're running the standard linux bridge setup (redundant bridge) for 5 years now. So first of all, thanks to everyone involved for implementing the bridging feature in Linux. Now I'm trying to bridge hosts connected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges)

Hello FrancisM, Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing to > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > >> Hello FrancisM, >> >> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is >> failing to

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:20 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello FrancisM, >>> >>> Thursday, April 7,

hi i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4 (backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org: vlan10 with raw device eth0 vlan20 with raw device eth0 br10 with initial port vlan10 br20 with initial port vlan20 i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for br20 the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's. "brctl

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >

Hello Mailinglist, please excuse my bad english - but I am not a native speaker. My Network looks like this: Internet --- dyn. IP --- Firewall (shorewall) --- LAN (192.168.X.X) No I try to connect my iphone (from mobile Internet G3) over VPN (l2tp/ipsec) with the firewall. But I can´t open the necessary Port 1701. /var/log/syslog ... Dec 30 00:24:29 router kernel: [226128.293757]

Hi: According to http://www.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Interfaces there is one recommendation for internal interface but wireless Wireless Interface -- maclist,routefilter,tcpflags,detectnets,nosmurfs a recommendation for wired internal interface?(100 win32 clients) I use tcpflags,detectnets thanks

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN

Hi, I''m trying to use Shorewall (3.0.6) to accomplish what I thought was going to be fairly simple. Unfortunately, I can''t get the dmz to work correctly, and I''m getting martians logged against the interface at issue. Any help I could get would be greatly appreciated! A picture of my physical setup is attached. I have also attached a shorewall dump. To make a long

Hi all, I've just recently replaced my old firewall with a new one, running CentOS 5.. Yesterday, I decided to get MRTG up and running again, so I entered sections like this into the mrtg.conf file: Title[vlan10]: Bandwidth usage on tenchi.4th-age.com (Internet) PageTop[vlan10]: <H1>Traffic stats on VLAN 10 (Internet)</H1> Target[vlan10]: `ifconfig vlan10 | /usr/bin/awk

I''m using Xen 4.1 and here''s what I did: 1.comment network-script and vif-script about bridge in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, uncomment the lines about nat 2.set vm config, add something like vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:00:00:11, ip=10.0.0.1'' ] 3.set /etc/network/interfaces in domU, add lines as follows: auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 10.0.0.1 gateway

Hello, I have a problem with simple traffic shapping in shorewall, my current configuration is: zones vlan10 ipv4 # interfaces vlan10 vlan10 detect tcpflags,routeback shorewall.conf TC_ENABLED=Simple tcinterfaces vlan10 Internal 1mbit:50kb shorewall show tc Device vlan10: qdisc prio 5: root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Hi! I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs dont view between they. New DC is "DC2" DC1 - vlan10 -> OK to DC3(Connectad by openvpn) DC1 -> vlan10 -> OK to DC2(vlan50) DC2-> vlan50 -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC2-> Openvpn -> Dont "see" DC3 DC3 -> Openvpn -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC3 -> Openvpn -> Dont "view" DC2(vlan50) All version

Hi! Thanks for answer. But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... I tested, shutdown  my DC1 DC2 dont comunication with DC3 I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... I waited more in 20 minutes Why ?? Regards; On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 10:30 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs

Beta 2 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) This release includes all defect repair from Shorewall 4.5.17.1. 2) The following warning message could be emitted

On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for answer. > > But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... > > I tested, shutdown  my DC1 > > DC2 dont comunication with DC3 > > I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... > I waited more in 20 minutes > > Why ?? > > Regards; > > > On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: >>