similar to: Bridged or routed in a Xen dom0?

Hello! I''ve the following set-up RemoteClient1 (Win Vista), RemoteClient2 (Win XP) do both connect to my OpenVPN box. They can talk to each other, using their 172.16.1.x tun0 Address on the server. The server itself (Ubuntu gutsy, OpenVPN: 2.0.9-8, shorewall:3.4.4-1) has 1 NIC that connects the machine to a) a DSL-router (forwards several ports to this linux machine, including the

I am trying to make the following connection: WindowsXP(OpenVPN-Client)->shorewall->Internet->LinksysWRTG->OpenVPN-Server ...of course the reverse path too. The OpenVPN server is running in bridge mode. When the openVPN client is launched it looks like a successful connection is made. The openVPN client gets assigned an address from the openVPN server pool. The OpenVPN

Hi peploe, i am new in the list, i need know, how blocked the Amule/emule in shorewall? My dist. debian version: 3.2.6-shorewall -- .~. / v \ Seja Livre, use GNU/Linux! /( )\ ^^-^^ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.

Hello , The folllowing is the error problem: Validating interfaces file... ERROR: The ''norfc1918'' option may not be specified on an interface with an RFC 1918 address. Interface:eth2 The shorewall interface file: net eth2 detect tcpflags,routefilter,norfc1918,nosmurfs,logmartians P.S. I tried to remove norfc1918 from interface

Hi! How I can use L7-Filter (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) with Shorewall? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Are shorewall-shell and shorewall-common required at compile time even if one only wishes to use shorewall-perl (4.0.9)? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

In my peculiar setup I need my shorewall router to do one-to-one NAT with RFC1918 addresses. The "external" addresses are 10.215.0.0 and the internal addresses are 192.168.0.0. I can ping, vnc, http, smb from 10.215.144.48 to 10.215.145.237 which is 192.168.44.237 internally. >From 192.168.44.237 I can do http, rdp, ping to 10.215.0.0 hosts. So all seems fine except for the fact

Hi list! I am configuring Shorewall on a Xen domU virtual machine. I configured only the zones, interfaces, rules, policy and shorewall.conf files. When I run "shorewall check" there aren''t no problems, but when I try to start shorewall I get this error a lot of time: iptables: Invalid argument ip6tables v1.3.6: can''t initialize ip6tables table `filter'': Bad

Perhaps it is obvious, but I have googled a lot and couldn''t find an answer. Is that error message something to worry about? FATAL: Error inserting nf_conntrack_ipv4 (/lib/modules/2.6.13-15.16- default/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ipv4.ko): Device or resource busy I am using OpenSuse 10.0 if that matters.

Greetings, There is a very old bug report [0] still floating around asking for a configuration check before restarting on upgrade. While this may not have been possible in the past, would it be possible now with Shorewall-perl? Regards, -Roberto [0] http://bugs.debian.org/200573 -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com

The ''detectnets'' interface option has always been a rather silly feature. For incoming packets, it duplicates the function of the ''routefilter'' option. It provides no value on output since it enforces the same thing that the routing table does. In other words, if you set ''routefilter'' and ''log_martians'' you get the same

I have four-interface Shorewall config set up. The "dmz" interface is bridged with "net" so I can assign public IP''s to the servers in the DMZ. I opted to do this rather than SNAT or ARP proxying because one of the servers runs Asterisk and SIP and NAT don''t always work well together. Somehow, my firewall config is causing a one-way audio problem in

Hi, I have a linux box with vpn client. shorewall version 3.4.0 I can connect to a remote vpn network with the nortel vpn client. Can I allow local machines on my network to access remote vpn using Linux box as a gateway? Thanks and Regards Anuj ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.

Hi, I''m in a process of setting up a firewall system, which is going to be also an ipsec/l2tp and pptp vpn server for some mobile clients. The problem is, that the system has two ISPs a cable one (no problems here) and a DSL provider. Because of the DSL provider the system is going to have one pppN interface for DSL (net zone) and many pppX interfaces for l2tp/pptp (loc zone)

Hello, On my systems i use shorewall 3.2.6. Now all systems where replace by new ones with new ip''s. So i tried with DNAT to map the old ip''s to the new one as long as DNS is updated. But i didn''t get it work. I see in tcpdump that a connect from client-ip to new-server-ip is done while connection the old on. But i get no response. Did i configure something in the

Hello everyone, is a pleasure to be here. I have a problem with my server, it runs qmail SMTP and protect it with shorewall. Since yesterday I get syn flood attacks on port 25, which means that no longer meet. How can I stop this with shorewall? my setup is as follows. zones: #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet loc Local Local networks dmz DMZ

Hello Tom! After i read and analyze some docs about IFB i decide that for implement this feature in Shorewall not need more efforts (of course i may be wrong). If we have 'ifb0' device then we must activate ingress discipline on real device (f.e. eth2) and redirect 'egress' from it to 'ifb0'. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip

Hello Chuck! I have 128kbit/s for 70 computers and if several users start several FTP/HTTP/Torrent downloads (or one downloads with several threads) or also open several htmlpages with big content, for other users remain not very much. As i hear Squid make traffic shaping on IPaddress base and in my scenario every user will work in equal borders (as another) for all his connections.

[ I hope this isn''t a dupe. Evolution crashed on my last send and I see nothing in my logs that leads me to believe the mail made it out before the crash ] Well, it probably is working. I''m probably just misunderstanding something. Given routing rules that look like this: 0: from all lookup local 10000: from all fwmark 0x40 lookup CGCO 10001: from all fwmark 0x80

I''ve opened up development of Shorewall 4.1. While I had previously announced that Shorewall 4.1 would focus on IPv6, I have since learned that the netfilter team are developing ''xtables'', a unified IP0v4/IPv6 utility. It seems silly to spend the effort to add Shorewall support for IPv6 only to then have to turn around and convert it to use xtables. So I''ve