similar to: Problem with ssh limit and scp stalling

Hello, Can anyone tell me my shorewall is get hacked ? or local Lan computers got Virus ? please see the following log. http://www.wilson-kwok.com/shorewall.txt Please help --------------------------------- 現在你可輕易阻擋垃圾郵件，立即使用Yahoo! Mail 你就會相信! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express

I''m currently using Shorewall 3.4.1 to manage a firewall for my LAN at home. It works very well, and I''m definitely pleased, but . . . . I now have a situation where I need to enforce access restrictions on a specific computer during specific times of day -- e.g., a particular computer might have no Internet access at all between 10 PM and 6 AM. Is there any way to do such a

Hi, I have a linux box with vpn client. shorewall version 3.4.0 I can connect to a remote vpn network with the nortel vpn client. Can I allow local machines on my network to access remote vpn using Linux box as a gateway? Thanks and Regards Anuj ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.

I have several computers connected to the internet through a DSL router that assigns rfc1918 (192.168.1.x) addresses to the systems connected. I have a server where shorewall is installed with one interface eth0, with a static ip (192.168.1.3). The router is configured to forward all connections from the internet to the linux server. I''d like to know how I can configure shorewall to

Hi list, thank you for Shorewall :) I''m trying to get a simple config to work but i can''t seem to work out how to gain access via ssh to the protected remote machine. But that doesn''t surprise me really as i have just spend well over an hour to find how to limit the lograte AND fill in the logburst in shorewall.conf. I have specified a logfile (not messages) in

Hi all, Another Debian Etch fan here, running shorewall (shell) 3.2.6-2 (and Yes I''m going to upgrade when Lenny goes stable). I already have the SSHKnock working, as documented on the website: http://www.shorewall.net/PortKnocking.html Thanks, works great! In addition to the knock to open 22, I want to also ADD a redirect, from 2222 to 22 on an internal box. So, when I knock on 1600

Hi, I have a machine with a Debian Stable installation that runs OpenVSwitch to connect a virtual machine on the same box. The machine is also running shorewall. The problem that I''m having is that shorewall try to run before openvswitch, this makes that shorewall fails because it can''t determine the IP of the virtual interface generated by openvswitch that start after

> > ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- > From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> > To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:52:36 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shaper > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:47:31PM -0500, RokeFeler wrote: > > Saludos, Tengo 3 inferfaces eth0, eth1, eth2 > > eth0 - Net > > eth1 -

Hello, Is it possible to split a port direction so it goes to one server or another? For example, I want abc.com to be routed to server X and def.com to go to server Y. Is it also possible to have e-mail addresses going to one server or another in the same concept so joe@abc.com will to server E and jane@abc.com goes to server F? If any of this is possible, what is the name of the

Hello Tom. Sorry, don't answer on my previouse letter, i forget to set subject. I fix this in current. And now about my question. I ask you before about method of stopping RFC1918 traffic on external interface and you advised me follow rule: REJECT! all net:$RFC1918_NETS Can i replace this rule by 'norfc1918' option in 'interfaces' file for this interface?

Hello, Please see the following picture: http://www.wilson-kwok.com/pptp.jpg I used one to one NAT from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.2 for web server, and then use port forwarding from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.3 for pptp server, but I cannot connect from my home to pptp server. Here is the nat file: 210.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.0.2 Here is the rules

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

Hi, I''m running mldonkey on same box as shorewall. I follow this http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/ShorewallConfiguration to open ports for edonkey protocol I add in /etc/shorewall/rules: # eDonkey 2000 ACCEPT net $FW tcp 4662 ACCEPT net $FW udp 4666 but I could not connect to any edonkey server. I check logs and notice that udp traffic on port 4666 is still dropped. Jul 8 22:35:57

In the docs at http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall-perl.html, "Your ipsets must be loaded before Shorewall starts. You are free to try to do that with the following code in /etc/shorewall/start" implies that code in /etc/shorewall/start is executed BEFORE Shorewall starts. In the default /etc/shorewall/start # /etc/shorewall/start # # Add commands below that you want to be

I was previously using multiple providers on my "real linux" gateway which had a kernel that supported high marks and I was policy routing in tcrules. I''ve now moved to openwrt where their kernel apparently does not have high marks. I want to continue to be able to have multiple providers and a) policy route between them and b) be able to set marks for other things like

Hello, The shorewall version is shorewall-3.0.7-1 installed in Centos 5.1 (kernal 2.6.18-53.el5) on March. Number one problem is: I edited the policy file was dmz loc ACCEPT info I could use 3389 remote desktop to loc Windows 2003 server but couldn''t use SSH (22 port) to loc Linux server. Also I tried open that two ports in

Hi, i wonder if there is any need to install shorewall on a machine located in the dmz zone of shorewaal. ( 3 interfaces example) mess-mate -- You are a fluke of the universe; you have no right to be here. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE

Hello *, I''m trying to setup Shorewall under Ubuntu 7.04 and Xen configured to use network-dummy instead of network-bridge (network-bridge seems to be buggy at the moment under Debian/Ubuntu). Is there a shorewall config example I can use in combination with network-dummy? In particular, with network-dummy there is no peth interface and the bridge include the real eth interface. I

when i start or restart syslog-ng, i''ve above message. Can this be a shorewall or iptables synchro ? mess-mate -- April 1 This is the day upon which we are reminded of what we are on the other three hundred and sixty-four. -- Mark Twain, "Pudd''nhead Wilson''s Calendar"