similar to: shorewall-tcrules.xml

Hello Asterisk sits in a Vserver guest (192.168.3.9) on the firewall. I can''t seem to get the sip helper to mark the SIP packets though. I have an ftp client on a different Vserver guest on the firewall. If I put ftp in the HELPER column of tcrules I can mark those packets. With sip in the HELPER column though nothing happens. Attached is a "shorewall dump > dump.txt"

Beta 2 is now available for testing. Problems Corrected since Beta 1: 1) References to the obsolete USE_ACTIONS option have been removed from the manpages. 2) NFLOG has been documented for some time as a valid ACTION in the rules files but support for that action was never implemented until this release. 3) The Checksum Target capability detection in the rules compiler was

Beta 2 is now available for testing. Problems Corrected since Beta 1: 1) References to the obsolete USE_ACTIONS option have been removed from the manpages. 2) NFLOG has been documented for some time as a valid ACTION in the rules files but support for that action was never implemented until this release. 3) The Checksum Target capability detection in the rules compiler was

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

Shorewall 4.5.21.4 is now available for download. Problems corrected since 4.5.21.3: 1) The Broadcast actions have been corrected: o --dst-type BROADCAST has been removed from the IPv6 version o A superfluous DROP rule in the IPv4 version has been suppressed. 2) Previously, if an HFSC class was specified with dmax but not umax, then the firewall would fail to start with the

Tom In Shorewall6 4.4.27 the following proxyndp entry: 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3 eth2 eth0 no no does not add the required route. The code produced in /var/lib/shorewall6/.restart is: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 run_ip route add 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 Splitting the line into 2 separate lines: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2

Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt. Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like this. 2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2. Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses So, how

Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from

Hello, It seems that the following restriction is not shown in the online man page for tcrules: ERROR: SOURCE/DEST PORT(S) not allowed with PROTO all : /tmp/shorewall/tcrules (line 2) Please let me know if this is expressed otherwise in the documentation. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world''s most

Hey all, Just a sanity check, but should the shorecap script in shorewall6-lite be sourcing /usr/share/shorewall6-lite/lib.base rather than /usr/share/shorewall-lite/lib.base like it does currently? In fact shouldn''t there be a general s/shorewall-lite/shorewall6-lite/ in shorecap in shorewall6-lite? Maybe there is more of that lurking about as well. Also, the first line of the

I''d like to ask for clarification on the upgrade procedure using tarballs. In the past, with version 4.4, I have downloaded shorewall-4.4.x.y.tar.bz2 and shorewall6-4.4.x.y.tar.bz2, extracted each, and executed ''install.sh -s'' in each directory. Now there is a new package shorewall-core-4.5.x.y.tar.bz2. As I understand it, with version 4.5, this core package needs to be

Hi to the list, I configured a multi-provider setup with /etc/shorewall/providers: Orange 1 1 main eth1 81.255.74.150 track,balance=1 eth0 Free 2 2 main eth2 88.180.116.254 track,balance=3 eth0 and /etc/shorewall/tcrules: 2:P 192.168.2.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 143 2:P 192.168.2.0/24

Hi, I have 2 Debian testing boxes running a very similar setup (both running the latest aptosid kernel); on one of them, since the iptables/libxtables10 packages have been upgraded from 1.4.19.1-1 to 1.4.20-2, shorewall-init can''t start shorewall anymore and for this reason ifupdown also fails triggering firewall up. Shorewall can be successfully started later on, and ifupdown starts

Dear all, I have configured both shorewall and shorewall6 on my firewall. Shorewall is using ULOG as logging target and since that did not seem to work I tried using NFLOG in shorewall6. However, nothing is logged in the /var/log files. Three questions: - What am I doing wrong? I just use LOG=NFLOG in the params file. - Can I use NFLOG for shorewall too? - Do I need ulogd when setting the

Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727648 for more info. Shorewall executes some bash code like the following: while read address interface external haveroute; do qt $IP -4 neigh del proxy $address dev $external [ -z "${haveroute}${g_noroutes}" ] && qt $IP -4 route del $address/32 dev $interface

Happy New Year, everyone. With the new year, comes a new major version of Shorewall. The reasons for opening a new version are: 1. The packaging and dependencies have changed in this release. 2. There are minor migration issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E