similar to: Samba4 no longer installing samba_upgradeprovision?

I tried building the latest master from git on debian wheezy. It seems to require libncurses-dev. I thought to add it into the wiki as a required package to install, but it seems one needs to ask for a login to the wiki. No prob ;) Could someone add it to the wiki? Or is this an unintentional dependency that will be removed? -- Michael De Groote ICT-coordinator Sint-Pietersschool Korbeek-Lo

Originally I had a Win 2003 DC. I added a samba 4.0.0 DC to the domain, allow full replication to take place and then transferred all the roles to the samba 4.0.0 dc. Finally I removed the Windows DC from the domain. Everything has been working well. Today I upgraded from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 and ran samba_upgradeprovision --full. Initially this was failing in update_present throwing an exception

Hi Andrew, Thanks to your input, I've been able to run the samba_upgradeprovision script. But the full oprion fails with : Creating a reference provision WARNING: no network interfaces found No IPv4 address will be assigned WARNING: no network interfaces found No IPv6 address will be assigned Update base samdb by searching difference with reference one Starting update of samdb There are 125

I made a try translating the group names one by one in the setup/provision_users.ldif file. The first groups went OK but when I translate "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" by "Générateurs d'approbations de forêt entrante", I get this error from the script : Traceback (most recent call last): File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1714, in

I've just configured Samba4 on Ubuntu (4.0.0+dfsg1-1), and can't seem to get roaming profiles working (I followed the guide at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO ) 1. Logons work just fine. 2. DNS is configured and working, running through SAMBA_INTERNAL 3. Clients can talk to the server and see/access shares at \\server.corp.domain.com 4. Clients are all Windows 8 and NTP

On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 13:34:52 +0200 Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > W dniu 2018-04-08 12:49, Rowland Penny via samba napisał(a): > > On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:31:26 +0200 > > Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I should try this command sooner. Now I have made full backup and > >> something is missing: >

On Sat, 2013-02-16 Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:55 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 12:52 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:50 -0500, Thomas Simmons wrote: >> > > Thank you, Andrew. Just to be clear, you're saying I can upgrade to 4.0.3 >> > > (but do nothing after make install)? If

On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:31:26 +0200 Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I should try this command sooner. Now I have made full backup and > something is missing: > > [root at dc ~]# cd /opt/samba-4.7.6/bin > [root at dc bin]# ./samba_upgradeprovision --realm=DOMAIN.NET.PL -U > Administrator > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your answer. I gave a try with source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision --full. Of course I did it on a virtual machine clone of our dc without network interface. The script fails with : ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1252: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=Account Operators,CN=Builtin,DC=removed,DC=com, conficts with CN=Op?rateurs de

I'm trying to use a DNS server independent from Samba (non BIND, on a different machine/system). Beyond the two simple records of: SRV _ldap._tcp.samdom.example.com and SRV _kerberos._udp.samdom.example.com If I maintain all the A records for individual hosts (& the server.samdom.example.com machine), should that work? Are there any other special / SRV records that Samba4's

On 18/12/14 16:19, Germ van Eck wrote: > Not sure about the high CPU load, but you have the [netlogon] share > twice in your smb.conf. Your first matches mine, have you added the > second yourself? > The second one looks weird with 2 path definitions. > Cj Tibbetts schreef op do 18-12-2014 om 08:59 [-0700]: >> New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting

Hello, Is it necessary or recommended to run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix' and 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' when upgrading from 4.0.0 to 4.0.3?

I made note the following in the 4.0.3 release notes about upgrades: o For more details concerning the ACL problem with delegation of privileges and deletion of accounts over LDAP interface (bugs #8909 and #9267) regarding upgrades from older 4.0.x versions, please see http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Upgrading which will be filled with details once we have

Hello, It seems Samba4 is having problems with CNAME records. I am seeing the same behavior as mentioned in the thread below. Is there any ETA on a fix for this? This is identical to the problem with MX records. This is currently a much bigger problem than the MX records. I appreciate any assistance. [root at DC1 var]# dig autodiscover.testdom.com CNAME ; <<>> DiG

Hello I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision must not be used, so i'm asking for the current upgrade procedure: - configure samba 4.0.4 - make - create current samba backup (just in case) - killall samba process - make install - run samba After that, the new binaries are in place, should i do something else? run an script? delete a file? anything?

On samba4 (git, from 5/2/13 version 5f82641553) I see a number of errors in the smbd log, like: [2013/05/03 14:16:15.431156, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:333(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file user1/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Templates/NormalEmail.dotm -- replying anyway Any thoughts on debugging / addressing these errors? I've seen a number of suggestions regarding

I'm running samba4 (compiled via git a few days ago, off 5530cc481653) on Ubuntu, as an AD DC. Everything works perfectly with the domain, /except/ that Samba seems to be returning incorrect DNS entries for the local domain computers -- any thoughts on how to debug this (or where Samba is getting its IPs from?). As an example: router/dhcp/upstream DNS is at 192.168.0.1 samba4 is at

Hi, This is strange what you are writing. Are you saying, that if Administrator is in Domain Users group = ALL my users have admins rights? Hard to believe. Moreover, I'm unable to delete Administrator from Domain Users group, as this is my basic group (I received such an info). I believe the keytab is needed to sth, cause without it I keep receiving: [2018/04/03 17:32:39.331938, 1]

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 19:07 +0100, Christophe Borivant wrote: > I made a try translating the group names one by one in the setup/provision_users.ldif file. > The first groups went OK but when I translate "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" by "Générateurs d'approbations de forêt entrante", > I get this error from the script : > Traceback (most recent call last):

>>> 2. KVNO mismatch - on the main DC >>> >>> [2018/04/03 14:36:46.822531, >>> 1] ../auth/gensec/spnego.c:411(gensec_spnego_parse_negTokenInit) >>> SPNEGO(gssapi_krb5) NEG_TOKEN_INIT failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE >>> [2018/04/03 14:36:46.968728, >>> 1] >>>