similar to: BTRFS and the steadily lit LED

Hi, I have 4 machines, all converted to BTRFS about 6 months ago, now all running Ubuntu Quantal with kernel 3.5.0-17 The matter is that all these machines are now getting slower and slower everyday, every disk access causing the disk to be 100% busy for long periods, to the point that I''m now seriously considering migrating everything back to ext4... From the start BTRFS was "not

Hi folks, I''m using Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal with # uname -r 3.5.0-24-generic And it seems I cannot defrag : # filefrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found # btrfs filesystem defrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic # echo $? 20 # filefrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found Any clue

Hi folks, Finaly following general advice received here, I could manage to upgrade all of my BTRFS boxes to the next Ubuntu Raring kernel (3.8.0-9), so I assume I now have something decently new ;-) I''m now looking for quota support, but, even though the wiki page and Wikipedia english page says BTRFS now has quota support, I couldn''t find any documentation or specific

Hi there, I have a system on which btrfsck gives the following output... I don''t understand the meaning of the reported errors, so any clue would be appreciated. Is this something I should worry about, or not ? Would I be advised to try "--repair" ? (Last time I tried this one, it completely b0rked a filesystem, beyond repair, and my wife would kill me ifever I trash this one,

As of the latest updates to anaconda and grub2 for Fedora 18, it is now possible to install with /boot as a btrfs subvolume. The way that grub2 is handling this is the "reach down" to the files it needs as if the subvolume was a directory. Is this OK? At this point I am not worried about snapshots or any other complexities. If the subvolume name is known. should grub2 be able to

Hi, I just received a new laptop with a Micron 256GB SSD, and I plan to install Fedora 20 onto it. I'm considering either BTRFS or ext4 (over LUKS-encrypted LVM) for this machine, but I'm afraid BTRFS might generate too much writes and shorten the SSD lifespan... Or am I mistaken ? Is there any pro/cons currently, on a 3.14 kernel, about using BTRFS along with an SSD ? Is there

Hi there, Since a few days, I have noticed that "btrfs fi df /" displays an entry about "unknown" used space, and I can see this on several Fedora machines, so it is not an issue related to a given system... Does anybody know what these "unknown" data are ? i.e: # btrfs fi df / Data, single: total=106.00GiB, used=88.28GiB System, DUP: total=32.00MiB,

Hi there, Machine got rebooted while scrub was in process, and now it looks like a scrub zombie... How do I restore this to a normal non-zombie state ? root@zafu:~# btrfs scrub status / scrub status for 13c87f57-3a85-4daf-a4bf-ba777407c169 scrub started at Mon Apr 7 09:49:48 2014, running for 693 seconds total bytes scrubbed: 34.06GiB with 0 errors root@zafu:~# btrfs scrub

Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade

Hi all, I just installed centos 5.4 xen-kernel on intel core i5 machine as dom0. After some hours of syncing a raid10 array (8 sata disk) I noticed a steadily increasing loadavg. I think without reasonable i/o wait or cpu utilization the loadavg on this system should be very lower. If this loadavg is normal I would be greatful if somone could explain why. The screenshots below show that there is

--=-mIogSkSG8HjWN56JSL46 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, If you have connection tracking enabled, then you have auto-magically ordered all packets to be defragged is that correct? I wonder if there is any noticible latency, especially in on-line games with defragging packets. Are there any ways to make an exception - to avoid tracking certain

Add man/btrfsctl.8.in Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/btrfsctl.8.in | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/btrfsctl.8.in diff --git a/man/btrfsctl.8.in b/man/btrfsctl.8.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e11f46a --- /dev/null +++ b/man/btrfsctl.8.in @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@

The proper fix would have been to select LEDS_CLASS but this can lead to a circular dependency, as found out by Arnd. This patch implements Arnd's suggestion instead, at the cost of some auto-magic for a fringe feature. Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # 4.9.x- Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> Reported-by: Intel's 0-DAY Fixes: 8d021d71b324

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825 Summary: broken led-delay parameter in the LED extension Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

From: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> Fixes a kernel crash on suspend/resume. --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c index 9eed5a6..5e28b5f 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_led.c @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ nouveau_led_suspend(struct

Hi, I''ve created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to snapper, it''s a tool for managing btrfs snapshots (http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archive/blocxx , and currently uses git source up to commit 50dec40. I''ve done

Hello Guys, While i work out the snapper on fedora 25 I've learnd more about python and snapper. Here the changes: Snapper: Created a combat util-linux 2.24.2 from fedora 20, static only. This make snapper rollback available (needfull thing). Tryed to patch snapper, there are to many changes. This will not breake centos 7 system. Only works for x86 / amd64 only this days & Centos 7,

Hello , I know its very tedious solving problems MS has on a Linux based Software A Windows XP machine without SP1 , Worked Fine until one day , everything is so SLOW , every mouse click reponds after 3-4 minutes , this account logs to a samba PDC , If its a PDC or samba problem then why is it so slow on stuff done locally on the computer , i scanned the PC with an Updated norton , and

Hello Guys, Last Sunday I had the idea to expand my gameplay btrfs. Now what was missing was a yum plugin which worked like arch or opensuse. Ok, I told myself and learned a little python. Also something for grub2 to boot into a snapshot. My results are up on: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/Centos7Btrfs/ grub2-btrfs (do not use grub-btrfs, this is the version before)

Hi all, Yesterday I converted my ext4 root and home partitions on my home machine to btrfs using btrfs-convert. After confirming that everything went well, I followed the wiki instructions to nuke the 'ext2_saved" subvolume, then defraggad and rebalanced. Everything went according to plan on my root partition, but my home partition claimed to have run out of space when rebalancing. I