similar to: [PATCH] btrfs: make orphan cleanup less verbose

I noticed while running xfstests 83 that if we didn''t have enough space to delete our inode the orphan cleanup would just loop. This is because it keeps finding the same orphan item and keeps trying to kill it but can''t because we don''t get an error back from iput for deleting the inode. So keep track of the last guy we tried to kill, if it''s the same as the

We do log replay in a single transaction, so it''s not good to do unbound operations during replaying log. This patch makes orphan inodes cleanup executed after replaying log. It also avoid doing other unbound operations such as truncating a file during replaying log. These unbound operations are postponed to the orphan inode cleanup stage. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng

Currently orphan cleanup only ever gets triggered if we cross subvolumes during a lookup, which means that if we just mount a plain jane fs that has orphans in it, they will never get cleaned up. This results in panic''s like these http://www.kerneloops.org/oops.php?number=1109085 where adding an orphan entry results in -EEXIST being returned and we panic. In order to fix this, we

This happens on a freshly created btrfs filesystem in a raid10 (4x1TB) configuration with three subvolumes and 1.5 TB data. When I try to snapshot one of the subvolumes (with 100 GB of data), it says that the snapshot creation failed and I get the following error message: btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -116 After the failure: - The snapshot exists in `btrfs subvolume list'' - The

I noticed we were getting lots of warnings with xfstest 83 because we have reservations outstanding. This is because we moved the orphan add outside of the truncate, but we don''t actually cleanup our reservation if something fails. This fixes the problem and I no longer see warnings. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 ++ 1

Hi btrfs-team/-users, I do observe a strange behavior upon booting of my openSUSE 12.1 system ( kernel 3.1.10-1.9-desktop; x86_64 ) with btrfsprogs-0.19-43.7.1.x86_64 utils installed: The system has two btrfs-vols: root(sda7) & home(sda8) and had been created during system setup of openSUSE 12.1: # btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: a288fcff-28c8-4764-8efe-1e0cb205d588

Because orphan cleanup now happens well after the fs is all initialized and such, we can run into this problem where we find orphan entries that were just added to the fs, not ones that were added previously during a crash. This does not bode well for the system, and results in a couple of odd things happening, like truncate being run on non-regular files. In order to fix this we just check and

In fixing how we deal with bad inodes, we had a regression in the orphan cleanup code, since it expects to get a bad inode back. So fix it to deal with getting -ESTALE back by deleting the orphan item manually and moving on. Thanks, Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 36

The log message level ''critical'' is verbose enough, ''emergency'' beeps on all terminals. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index b2d1eac..1fd7b5d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@

Hi, I am using btrfs for remote backups (via rsync), with daily and weekly snapshots. I see these messages in kern.log: Jul 18 07:09:43 backup1 kernel: [3437126.458374] btrfs: unlinked 9 orphans Jul 18 12:01:01 backup1 kernel: [3454604.905856] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Jul 18 13:01:51 backup1 kernel: [3458254.990199] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Jul 19 04:01:41 backup1 kernel: [3512244.236347]

I''m trying to keep a Last Modified column in my record lists a fixed width and as narrow as possible. <td><%=time_ago_in_words record.updated_at%></td> However, making room for certain values like "less than a minute" force me to make the column twice as wide than, say, "12 hours" or "10 days". I would prefer "0

We have an imap-client (SOGo) that doesn't handle this status output while searching: * OK Searched 76% of the mailbox, ETA 0:50 Is there any way to disable this output on the dovecot-side? -jf

Good day, Is there a setting the user can change to make R CMD check stack traces output less and make it easier to spot the line of code that's the problem? I use R Under development. Part of the trace I see looks like: --- R stacktrace --- where 1: .local(model, test, ...) where 2: (new("nonstandardGenericFunction", .Data = function (model, test, ...) {

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:27:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Logging state transitions in debug mode produces huge amounts of > output which is not especially helpful. This change removes this > debugging output. This reduces the debug output by approximately two > thirds. > --- > generator/state_machine_generator.ml | 12 ------------ > 1 file changed, 12

Unless you suppress all output with the -q option, rsync will always print an initial "building/receiving file list ... done" line. In my opinion, this is a bit superfluous. When I want to see a progress indication, I can use the --progress option. Another issue is the 3-line transfer speed and speedup factor report at the end. So every rsync invocation produces at least four lines of

Hello, I am running kernel 2.6.4 on XScale/ARM with BusyBox. Quite frequently after shutdown I have a number of orphaned inodes on the ext3 filesystem. (I have yet to figure out the precise cause of the orphans, but I believe it has to do with umount failing at shutdown due to a bug in BusyBox init that does not properly kill processes.) It is my understanding the orphaned inode list should be

Hi all, In 1.4 and 1.2 there is a hole that leaves orphans in a orphan directory till fsck was run or recovery occurs on that slot. In the current implementation, if node A did rm of a file while it is opened by node B. Now if node A umounts and node B dies and is restarted first, it only recovers itself leaving orphan file in node A's orphan directory. In order to fix the problem, I am

Srini, Ok, you can go ahead and cook up the background orphan cleaner. Now, we can do this in a workqueue, a thread, or a timer. I don't see why a timer doesn't work. When the timer fires, you do this: 1. Take EX on a new orphan_scan lock. 2. check the LVB for the last scan time. If it's less than the scan timeout, reset the timer for (timeout - last scan), drop the EX, and

In btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(), there is a classic case where kzalloc() was incorrectly paired with kzfree(). According to David Sterba, there isn't any sensitive information in the subvol_info that needs to be cleared before freeing. So kfree_sensitive() isn't really needed, use kfree() instead. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba at suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman

Hi, I received the message: btrfs: unlinked 34 orphans Just out of couriosity: what does it mean ? Thanks in advance Bye, David Arendt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html