similar to: Unable To Resize btrfs Partition

Hi, Let me know if this is the wrong place to ask... I''m using Fedora 12 x86_64, mostly with the newer 21.6.32 kernel, and have a single btrfs filesystem within a 120Gb partition. I''d like to extend the space btrfs can use. One option is presumably add a new device to btrfs, but I was hoping to simple resize the existing partition to say 160Gb. With ext4 I might do

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/Makefile | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ man/btrfsck.8.in | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/Makefile create mode 100644 man/btrfsck.8.in diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2665dd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/Makefile

The new xfstests will run fsck against the volume to make sure we didn''t introduce any inconsistencies, which is nice except we will error out immediately if we mount with inode_cache. We need to make btrfsck skip the special free space cache items and then just assume that we have a link for the free space cache inode item. This makes btrfsck pass with success on a fs with inode cache

add man/btrfs-image.8.in Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com> --- man/Makefile | 5 ++++- man/btrfs-image.8.in | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/btrfs-image.8.in diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile index 2665dd1..b7a7340 100644 --- a/man/Makefile +++ b/man/Makefile @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

Short options have to be repeated at the getopt_long call. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- btrfsck.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c index 088b9f4..2e81adc 100644 --- a/btrfsck.c +++ b/btrfsck.c @@ -3499,7 +3499,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) while(1) { int c; - c = getopt_long(ac, av, "",

Hello all, I recently had a power failure and can no longer mount my /home directory. The harddrive has two BTRFS partitions: sda7(/) and sda8(/home). The / partition loads up just fine, but /home does not. I''ve tried btrfsck as shown below and I''ve included dmesg pertaining to btrfs. This is on ArchLinux and the software versions are as follows: btrfs-progs-unstable

Hi devs, I can''t mount my btrfs-based external disk. I don''t know what happened to the disk, but usually it gets disconnected (usb cable pulled out) buy my 8 months old daughter. Here''s the output from dmesg: [ 299.699543] parent transid verify failed on 528952573952 wanted 22726 found 22728 [ 299.700947] btrfs read error corrected: ino 1 off 528952573952 (dev

How do you resize the partition without loosing data? gparted does not support LVM. On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:37 AM, SysAdmin <admin at s-s.network> wrote: > Hi, > > you need to resize partition /dev/xvda2, afterwards resize pv. > > Regards, > Holger > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] Im Auftrag

Remove unused variable in btrfs-image.c (update_super) and update man page documentation about -r option. Running btrfsck on a restored image produces missing chunk information. This is because by default, btrfs-image fixes up chunk tree to use 1 stripe pointing to the primary device. This in turns results in btrfsck making some noise. $ ./mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb2 -f $ ./btrfs-image /dev/sdb2

Hello, trying out btrfs on my linux installation. I am running Funtoo with Linux 3.0 kernel. After a reboot kernel panicked (no access to error log since it is my root volume that failed). I get this using a rescue cd (2.6.38, btrfs v 0.19) and then trying to mount : [  752.129118] btrfs bad tree block start 0 131072 [  752.129152] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sda5 [  752.132190] btrfs:

Hello! Today I downgraded from Ubuntu''s APT repo "oneiric-proposed" (which brings some kernel 3.0.0-13) back to the standard repo "oneiric". Now I''m not able to mount my btrfs / and /home (both on the same partition) anymore: device fsid SOME-UUID devid 1 transid 84229 /dev/dm-0 parent transid verify failed on 77078528 wanted 83774 found 84226

Hi, I have two guest vm instance running CentOS 5 with ext3 partition. I will like to reduce 1 VM harddisk space and using the 'release' harddisk space to add onto my second VM. Basically I need to know how can I reduce and increase an ext3 partition in CentOS KVM. I did a search and basically i can do it by booting the VM using Knoppix and use Gparted to reduce and increase the

Hi all, I''ve been playing with btrfs resize recently and run into strange looking behavior to me. One of my simple test scenario was following: - partition some block device (lets say sda sectors 2-2000 are sda1) - try to create btrfs on top of it (just mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1) - fill the fs with data - unmount the device - let''s simulate usual mistake here: downsize the

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Bernard Fay <bernard.fay at gmail.com> wrote: > How do you resize the partition without loosing data? > > gparted does not support LVM. > > It is preferrable to create PV on the whole disk also to manage these kind of situations. In case I have to manage with partitions, the must is that you can do it only if it is the last partition, and you

A user reported that fsck was complaining about unresolved refs for some snapshots. You can reproduce this by doing mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt btrfs subvol snap /mnt/ /mnt/a btrfs subvol snap /mnt/ /mnt/b btrfs subvol del /mnt/a umount /mnt btrfsck /dev/sdb and you''d get this unresolved ref root 258 dir 256 index 2 namelen 1 name a error 600 because snapshot b has a dir

Hi, I have a c5 machine with a 3ware controller in it that I am using for iscsi targets. The iscsi target is built on lvm. The client then sees it as /dev/sdb1. If I put a gpt partition on it and try to shrink it I loose the partition table. If I expand it gparted complains with the following warning: "Not all of the space available to /dev/sda appears to be used, you can fix the GPT to use

Hi, I thought that I would attempt a quick little patch that will make btrfsck into a No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck. The reasoning is that the FAQ states that it is recommended and safe to do so, and the current 12.04 version of Ubuntu just symlinks fsck.btrfsck to btrfsck instead of /bin/true. PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up! Dan McGrath (1): btrfs-progs: No-op when

A few months ago, my btrfs storage array became corrupted because of a power failure. A while ago, I made this thread to try and resolve the problem. (http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/11904/15955/) You can find detailed information about the problem in the previous thread, but I am happy to provide any other details. It didn''t really go anywhere in the way of solving my problem. The

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I resized a partition inside a KVM RAW file system disk image. When I > start the Win7 virtual machine it does not report the new partition > size. It shows the file system as 15GB instead of the 50GB size of the > partition that it lives on. I gather from hours so reading the

Here's the situation. I have a dual boot machine - originally had Red Hat and Windows 2000 Pro. The NTFS partition never did seem to 'get along' with the Adaptec 2400A caching RAID controller. Linux always seemed to like the I2O drivers. I went from RH Enterprise to now running Centos 5.5. Works great! I really don't want the 200 gigs worth of NTFS. Can't I just run