similar to: cannot mount with acl

Hello all, Is there any patches for btrfs to use enhanced area in eMMC (it will allow to boost performance i.e. it very useful to keep metadata within this area) ? If it''s exist let me know how to find it and use it. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Hi all, I have two multi-disk btrfs filesystems on a Arch linux 3.4.0 system. After a power failure, both filesystems refuse to mount [ 10.402284] Btrfs loaded [ 10.402714] device fsid 1e7c18a4-02d6-44b1-8eaf-c01378009cd3 devid 4 transid 65282 /dev/sdc [ 10.403108] btrfs: force zlib compression [ 10.403130] btrfs: enabling inode map caching [ 10.403152] btrfs: disk space caching is

Hello, I''ve got a quick question: Does btrfs adapt to size changes of the underlying block device(s)? My specific situation is as follows: I''ve got a luks-volume on which I want to put btrfs. If this luks-volume grows in the future (i.e. by ''cryptsetup resize''), will btrfs automatically (and reliably) "see" this and be able to use the additional

Greetings, I have a few questions pertaining to BTRFS RAID. I know it''s been rumored a lot recently that kernel 3.4 will have RAID5/6 support, is this still the case. Also, is it possible to change from a single drive system to a raid system or even a multi drive system without raid to a raid system while there is data on the drives an successfully convert them without loosing data?

For using SSDs: Are there any format/mount parameters that should be set for using btrfs on SSDs (other than the "ssd" mount option)? General questions: How long is the ''delay'' for the delayed alloc? Are file allocations aligned to 4kiB boundaries, or larger? What byte value is used to pad unused space? (Aside: For some, the erased state reads all 0x00, and for

Hi all, below a configuration for udev/initramfs which I propose to scan the block devices looking for a multi-volume btrfs filesystem. Btrfs has the capability to span a file-system on multiple device. In order to do that, the involved devices have to be "registered" in the kernel. In order to do that there are two options: # btrfs device scan <device> (or the old

Hi, I'm wondering why when I use --size-only on the same file, except the modification time, rsync transfers the modification time? I was under the impression that --size-only caused rsync to transfer files based upon differences in the size of the file. For example: #cp Untitled.pdf Untitled-2.pdf #touch Untitled.pdf #rsync -ani --size-only Untitled.pdf Untitled-2.pdf .f..t......

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36422 Summary: unable to hibernate with nouveau and NV11 [bisected] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

If we''ve abandoned the idea of putting the number of redundant blocks into the top bits of the type bitmask (and I hope we have), then we''re fairly much there. Current code is at: git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-progs-raid56.git We have recovery working, as well as both full-stripe writes

Hi, I've been trying to use "--checksum-seed" to speed up backups . I have a homebrew script which creates incremental backups using hardlinks. To save disk space I turn on --checksum so that when file's mod-times change rsync doesn't create a new file (breaking the hardlinking) unless the contents of the file are different as well. I tested the command: #rsync -aHiy

Always show info like ''operation not supported''. Any workaround? Thanks. Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20110316/2f58e589/attachment.html>

My original has Posix ACLs (they work fine, that's not the issue). I screwed up my backup by forgetting to copy the ACLs. But now my backup isn't right and I want to fix it. Using the right `rsync` with the right parameter isn't enough to fix the problem. Even the right `rsync` sees this as "no change" and doesn't copy anything (since the file contents haven't

Hi everyone We're really struggling with nfs4 <--> windows acls. Scenario Samba4 share --> cifs --> win7. No problem Samba4 share --> nfs4 --> Linux. acls not inherited Neither is there inheritance vica versa. e.g. It is not possible to create files with group rw on a umask 0022 nfs4 share. nfs4_setfacl cannot override umask. Using POSIX or windows acls this works

At the beginning of August, Mikulas Patocka posted to linux-kernel mailing list about adding snapshot merging to LVM[1]. Basicaly, snapshot merging means that it is possible to turn a snapshot back into its origin. Using LVM, however, means that you need to have free place outside of the filesystem (i.e., in physical volume) to make snapshots, which is not always possible on workstations and

In btrfs if we mount with "compress" we have no way to disable compressing by remounting (mount -o remount /mnt/btrfs), only by unmounting and mounting without "compress". This patch adds "nocompress" mount option which can be used to remount the filesystem without compression: # mount -o remount,nocompress /mnt/btrfs This option is usefull in cases when we have a

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

Please forgive the cross-post; I'm not sure where this issue lies. Samba 3.5.1, CentOS 5.5 x86_64 PDC with Win2K, WinXP, Win2003 and Win7 32-bit domain members, tdbsam backend. Cygwin 1.7.7. All basic functionality seems to be fine, except... On Win2K, WinXP and Win2003, a "DIR /Q" on a mapped share always displays the owner as "BUILTIN\Administrators", but a