similar to: [RFC] Move btrfsck in to the btrfs command

Hi gang, I was a little surprised to see that patch go by recently which fixed an endian bug. I went to see how sparse checking looked and it was.. broken. I got it going again in my Fedora environment. Most of the patches are just cleanups, but there *were* three real bugs lurking in all that sparse warning spam. So I maintain that it''s worth our time to keep it going and fix

Hi all again... I did a chroot patch with ability to change uid and gid. I dunno if you all approve with the current implementation but the patch is small and it works here. remember to CC, since i'm not on this ml... //Ian Kumlien PS. To anyone on vorbis-dev, I'm *REALLY* sorry must be tired or something.. =) DS. <p><p><p> -------------- next part -------------- A

Hi everyone I have been trying to get Dovecot installed with OpenSSL support, but no matter what I do, when I run Configure, it says "Building with SSL support.........No". I have even tried configure --with-ssl=openssl, to no avail. I have built and installed OpenSSL, and libssl.so and libcrypto.so are in the /lib directory - what more does Dovecot want? I have tried figuring it out

Hello, This is the userspace part of restriper, rebased onto the new progs infrastructure. Restriper commands are located under ''balance'' prefix, which is now the top level command group. However to not confuse existing users ''balance'' prefix is also available under ''filesystem'': btrfs [filesystem] balance start btrfs [filesystem] balance

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96802 Bug ID: 96802 Summary: Upgrading mesa from 11.0.6 -> 11.2.2 causes graphics deadlock Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component:

Hello! I have laid SSL aside for the time being, and continued compiling and installing Dovecot. Now I don't know how to start it! I have been through the config file and mostly left things as-is. I have created the dovecot user and group and put only dovecot user in the dovecot group. Then I tried imap-master, as specified in the INSTALL documentation, but there is no such file! Under

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145 Bug ID: 1145 Summary: nft 0.7: expression.c:966: range_expr_value_low: Assertion '0' failed. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248 Bug ID: 1248 Summary: The rr-load-balance part doesn't actually work on 0.7 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253 Bug ID: 1253 Summary: interface wildcard in variables causes Error: Byteorder mismatch: expected big endian, got host endian Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

Heyho! (This is using btrfs from Debian''s 2.6.32 2.6.32-3-kirkwood kernel (-9 package; btrfs tools is v0.19-16-g075587c) A few observations about btrfsck: a btrfsck run on a 2T volume (4 disks) on a QNAP appliance (512M ram) got killed by Mr. OOM Killer. Initially, I was quite surprised. I''m only moderately surprised now since it might well be that I forgot to enable

Hi folks! Been using btrfs for quite a while now, worked great until now. Got power-loss on my machine and now i have the "parent transid verify failed on X wanted X found X" problem. So I can''t get it to mount. My btrfs is spread over sda (2tb), sdc(2tb), sdd(1tb). Is this something that an offline fsck could fix ? If so is the fsck-util being developed ? Is there a way to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1238 Bug ID: 1238 Summary: meta limits protocols when it shouldn't Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

I have accidently damaged the first block(s) of a btrfs partition and can''t mount it anymore. I can see that my data is still intact by running a command like: cat /dev/sda5 | hexdump -C | more Do any (experimental) tools exist which would allow me to recover the files? Thank you -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a

Hello. I am continuing my tests of BtrFS under a practical workload. Recently an incorrect poweroff (or maybe a small bug in BtrFS) caused a small data loss. The actual damage was non-existent. I used old branch, so maybe the relevant code is already improved. 1. Why btrfsck says "bad block" on that partition? What does it mean? My fist reaction was to use badblocks. It found no

Hi, I thought that I would attempt a quick little patch that will make btrfsck into a No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck. The reasoning is that the FAQ states that it is recommended and safe to do so, and the current 12.04 version of Ubuntu just symlinks fsck.btrfsck to btrfsck instead of /bin/true. PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up! Dan McGrath (1): btrfs-progs: No-op when

Is it expected that running btrfsck more than once will keep reporting errors? Below is the end of a btrfsck output when run the second time. backpointer mismatch on [111942471680 32768] owner ref check failed [111942471680 32768] ref mismatch on [111942504448 40960] extent item 1, found 0 Incorrect local backref count on 111942504448 root 5 owner 160739 offset 3440640 found 0 wanted 1 back

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> (This patch is for the review/test not yet for the integration). Here is an implementation of the feature to add label to the subvolume and snapshots. Which would help sysadmin to better manager the subvol and snapshots. This can be done in two ways, one - using attr which is user land only changes but drawback is able to change the label

Dear list members, In my previous thread at http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg23333.html there was a space_cache kernel bug/panic on kernel 3.8. I could successfully "fix" that with rebuilding the cache. But some files were missing/corrupted. So I booted a rescue CD with kernel 3.7 and ran btrfsck --repair, which repaired quite a few things. After a reboot I

Hi devs, I can''t mount my btrfs-based external disk. I don''t know what happened to the disk, but usually it gets disconnected (usb cable pulled out) buy my 8 months old daughter. Here''s the output from dmesg: [ 299.699543] parent transid verify failed on 528952573952 wanted 22726 found 22728 [ 299.700947] btrfs read error corrected: ino 1 off 528952573952 (dev

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel