similar to: btrfs-undelete shell-script

Hi! I have made some extensions to debugfs to undelete or recover files from a damaged ext3 file system. Salvage or undelete files of damaged ext2/ext3 file systems debugfs salvage command can be used to salvage files from a damaged ext3 or ext2 file system. The code is alpha, so use at your own risk. the usage is: salvage first-block count-blocks Salvage tries to salvage files found in

Months ago there was a thread here about the implementation of a simple undelete-function (i.e: dont delete files, but move them to a folder). Is this this still a relevant idea or has this feature low priority ? thanx, peter ps: anyone knows about a 3rd-party software (propably on nt-side) that implements such a feature ? -- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43 676 3574035 fax : +43 676 3546512

I'm using the lazy expunge plugin as configured in: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge The page claims users can undelete messages without assistance from a sysadmin. How is this accomplished? When I try to subscribe to the folders under the EXPUNGED namespace, nothing happens. ~Cory Coager

I was fooled by a hard link trying to clean up disk space. How can I undelete many files? (time is of the essence as I cannot unmount the partition) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th

Plz help me. My Q:I want solid help on how to undelete files in ext3 fs?How can I? Plz help me with full concepts with debug_fs or any other way to undel ? regards, pranav

Hi, I undelete an entire directory /var/www/html/* under RH 7.3 under ext3 . Is there an utility to recover the data ? Thanks in advance.

Today our Novell file server attacked by the virus "Explore worm". many word & excel & powerpoint files are deletetd and the file size become 0. with novell's utility, it is just easy to recover the deleted files. although the same files is deleted several times, we can find the original back. >From long time ago, we are trying to use samba instead of novell. the

David Collier-Brown <davecb@canada.sun.com> ©ó 99/06/14 11:42:22 PM ¦¬¥ó¤H¡G tbsky lee/unicap, samba@samba.org, Michel <michel@nyenrode.nl>

I just removed a bunch of Personal stuff I should not have. Is there anyway to undelete??? Jerry

We want ''btrfs subvolume list'' only to list readonly subvolumes, this patch set introduces a new option ''r'' to implement it. You can use the command like that: btrfs subvolume list -r <mnt> Changelog v2 -> v3: - re-implement list_subvols() - re-implement this read-only subvolume list function based on the new list_subvols() Changelog v1 -> v2: -

Hi there: > ps: my little suggestion: if we add some parameters at smb.conf like > protected dir = /home/share, /home/user1 ; > trashcan dir = /smbtrash ; It seems that implementation of such parameter has some difficulties and eventuates reduction on performance (e.g. handling "protected dir"s and "trash dir" on the different devices like /dev/hda1

All - I''ve put together a new integration branch based on Chris''s new master. This includes the userspace patches for qgroups, restriper, and Josef''s restore utility, plus a bunch of other things with mostly minor impact. The shortlog is attached at the end of this email. As always, it''s available from:

I`m sorry to post that topic again, but i propose to implement a way to recover information deleted in ext3 (undeletion) in my graduation class, and i want to know your opinion and suggestions about that. I read about that at linux kernel mailing list and somebody said something about do that in vfs and it will be aplied to all filesystems. What do you thing about it ? ps.: sorry about my

There is a missing dependency: liblzo2-dev Without it, the make fails with: ~/tmp$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git ~/tmp$ cd btrfs-progs ~/tmp/btrfs-progs$ sudo apt-get install uuid-dev libattr1-dev zlib 1g-dev libacl1-dev e2fslibs-dev libblkid-dev ~/tmp/btrfs-progs$ make [CC] ctree.o [CC] disk-io.o [CC] radix-tree.o

An old version of btrfs-progs (3.17 in this case) has a different version string, so adapt our filtering to include this line as well. Related to/updates commit 839ae5bcd537b3dc4f13bbea6fe40091ebc2b7f0. --- daemon/btrfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index d18f518..23513a9 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> $ LDFLAGS=-static make gcc -lpthread -g -O0 -o btrfs btrfs.o btrfs_cmds.o scrub.o \ ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o print-tree.o root-tree.o dir-item.o file-item.o inode-item.o inode-map.o crc32c.o rbtree.o extent-cache.o extent_io.o volumes.o utils.o btrfs-list.o btrfslabel.o -static -luuid scrub.o: In function

Hi, In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 15:59:19, Chen Hanxiao ha scritto: > btrfs-progs v4.1 add support to change uuid of btrfs fs. This needs to support older btrfs-progs versions though, so run btrfstune to check whether it has the -U parameter, and if not return the old error message. Something like test_btrfs_device_add_needs_force for example. Also: $ btrfs --version btrfs-progs v4.0 $

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

If I scan I device with a btrfs with -A, it finds it: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -A /dev/sda5 operation complete Btrfs v0.19-1-g4f89b6e-dirty But when I do a "scan all devices", it can''t find my btrfs on /dev/sda5: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -a Scanning for Btrfs filesystems failed to read /dev/sr0 I''m using btrfs-progs-unstable version

In trfs-progs 4.4 the error message has been changed, and our check did not work anymore. Yes, parsing user messages really sucks... --- daemon/btrfs.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index 85dbe00..c67af83 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@ -1029,9 +1029,12 @@ do_btrfs_subvolume_show (const char