similar to: raid10 data fs full after degraded mount

Hi, I have a mysql instance which if I point more load towards it it suddenly gets 100% in SYS as shown below. It can work fine for an hour but eventually it gets to a jump from 5-15% of CPU utilization to 100% in SYS as show in mpstat output below: # prtdiag | head System Configuration: SUN MICROSYSTEMS SUN FIRE X4170 SERVER BIOS Configuration: American Megatrends Inc. 07060215

I would like to set up CentOS on 4 SATA hard drives that I would like to configure in RAID10. I read somewhere that Raid10 support is in the latest kernel, but I can't seem to get anaconda to let me create it. I only see raid 0, 1, 5, and 6. Even when I tried to set up raid5 or raid1, it would not let me put the /boot partition on it, and I though that this was now possible. Is it

We have DELL R910 with H800 adapter in it. several MD1220 connect to H800. Since MD1220 have 24 hard disks in it. When I configured RAID10, there is a choice call 'single spanned virtual disk" (22 disks). Can anyone tell me how "single spanned virtual disk" work? Any document relate to it? Thanks.

Hello! I have a 1 TB ext4 drive that''s quite full (~50 GB free space, though I could free up another 100 GB or so if necessary) and two empty 0.5 TB drives. Is it possible to get another 1 TB drive and combine the four drives to a btrfs raid10 setup without (if all goes well) losing my data? Regards, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

I just created a 4 drive mdadm --level=raid10 on a centos 4.8-ish system here, and shortly thereafter remembreed I hadn't updated it in a while, so i ran yum update... while installing/updating stuff, got these errors: Installing: kernel ####################### [14/69] raid level raid10 (in /proc/mdstat) not recognized ... Installing: kernel-smp

hi guys, gals do you know if conversion from lvm's raid10 to raid0 is possible? I'm fiddling with --splitmirrors but it gets me nowhere. On "takeover" subject man pages says: "..between striped/raid0 and raid10."" but no details, nowhere I could find documentation, nor a howto. many thanks, L.

Hello, On my system with a Intel SCU Controller and a Raid 10 System it is not possible to install this Raid10. I have tested this with a CentOS 7 and Opensuse all found my Raid but with CentOS 8 this is broken? I found on start the Installation a Error from mdadm that ist all. Now I download and Test the Stream iso? and hope ..... -- mit freundlichen Gr?ssen / best regards G?nther J,

Hi, I have a Btrfs RAID 10 (data and metadata) file system that I believe suffered a disk failure. In my attempt to replace the disk, I think that I've made the problem worse and need some help recovering it. I happened to notice a lot of errors in the journal: end_request: I/O error, dev dm-11, sector 1549378344 BTRFS: bdev /dev/mapper/Hitachi_HDS721010KLA330_GTA040PBG71HXF1 errs: wr

Hi! The problem is that the BTRFS raid10 filesystem without any understandable cause refuses to mount. Here is dmesg output: [77847.845540] device label linux-btrfs-raid10 devid 3 transid 45639 /dev/sdc1 [77848.633912] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts [77848.633917] btrfs: enabling auto defrag [77848.633919] btrfs: use lzo compression [77848.633922] btrfs: turning on flush-on-commit [77848.658879]

Greetings! I''m testing raid6, and recently added two drives. I haven''t been able to properly resume a balance operation: the number of total chunks is always too low. It seems that the balance starts and pauses properly, but always resumes with ~7 chunks. Here''s an example: vendikar tim # uname -r 3.10.0-031000rc4-generic vendikar tim # btrfs fi sho Label:

Hi all, I have a question about replacing a drive in raid10 (and linux kernel 3.8.4). A bad disk was physical removed from the server. After this a new disk was added with "btrfs device add /dev/sdg /btrfs" to the raid10 btrfs FS. After this the server was rebooted and I mounted the filesystem in degraded mode. It seems that a previous started balance continued. At this point I want to

Hi All. I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots from it. It looks like so: mdadm -D /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 00.90 Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009 Raid Level : raid10 Array Size : 973827968 (928.71 GiB 997.20 GB) Used Dev Size : 486913984 (464.36 GiB 498.60 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 4 Preferred Minor : 1

Does anyone know of a card that actually works with CentOS 4 that supports Raid10? I don't think CentOS support software raid 10 from the installer. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050812/ab215629/attachment-0002.html>

So after troubleshooting this for about a week, I was finally able to create a raid 10 device by installing the system, copying the md modules onto a floppy, and loading the raid10 module during the install. Now the problem is that I can't get it to show up in anaconda. It detects the other arrays (raid0 and raid1) fine, but the raid10 array won't show up. Looking through the logs

Hi list, I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b. I have a three disk array of level single: # btrfs fi sh Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.55TB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 2.73TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb

Hello! I''m using ArchLinux with kernel Linux horus 3.10.5-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT. Mounting and unmounting takes a long time: # time mount -v /mnt/Archiv mount: /dev/sde1 mounted on /mnt/Archiv. mount -v /mnt/Archiv 0,00s user 0,16s system 1% cpu 9,493 total # sync && time umount -v /mnt/Archiv umount: /mnt/Archiv (/dev/sdd1) unmounted umount -v /mnt/Archiv 0,00s user

Hi, On (06/16/16 08:12), Minchan Kim wrote: > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > > [ 315.146576] Modules linked in: lzo zram zsmalloc mousedev coretemp hwmon crc32c_intel r8169 i2c_i801 mii

Greetings, until yesterday I was running a btrfs filesystem across two 2.0 TiB disks in RAID1 mode for both metadata and data without any problems. As space was getting short I wanted to extend the filesystem by two additional drives lying around, which both are 1.0 TiB in size. Knowing little about the btrfs RAID implementation I thought I had to switch to RAID10 mode, which I was told is

Hello Minchan, -next 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614 [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN [ 315.146576] Modules linked in: lzo zram zsmalloc mousedev coretemp hwmon crc32c_intel r8169 i2c_i801 mii snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic

Hiya, Recently, a btrfs file system of mine started to behave very poorly with some btrfs kernel tasks taking 100% of CPU time. # btrfs fi show /dev/sdb Label: none uuid: b3ce8b16-970e-4ba8-b9d2-4c7de270d0f1 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 4.25TB devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.52TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 2.70TB used 1.49TB path /dev/sda4 devid 3 size