similar to: btrfs crash - Null dereference - 3.7.0-rc5-00068-gc5e35d6

Hello, I''m seeing a lot of warnings in dmesg with a BTRFS filesystem. I''m using the 3.1 kernel, I found a patch for these warnings ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2) <http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2>, but that patch has already been included in 3.1. Are there any other patches I can try? I''m using

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

When adding orphans to an inode''s root, we start a transaction for that root that when ended in several places such as for example extent-tree.c:btrfs_remove_block_group(), inode.c:btrfs_unlink() and inode.c:btrfs_evict_node(), doesn''t result in a commit, that is, inode.c:btrfs_orphan_commit_root() doesn''t get called (via transaction.c:commit_fs_roots()). The respective

We''ve been seeing warnings coming out of the orphan commit stuff forever from ceph. Turns out it''s because we''re racing with checking if the orphan block reserve is set, because we clear it outside of the spin_lock. So leave the normal fastpath checks where they are, but take the spin_lock and _recheck_ to make sure we haven''t had an orphan block rsv added in

I''ve been working on running down intermittent ENOSPC issues. I can only seem to replicate ENOSPC errors when running zlib compression. However, I have been seeing similar ENOSPC errors to a lesser extent when playing with the LZ4HC patches. I apologize for not following up on this sooner, but I had drifted away from using zlib, and didn''t notice there was still an issue. My

An user reported that he has hit an annoying deadlock while playing with ceph based on btrfs. Current updating device tree requires space from METADATA chunk, so we -may- need to do a recursive chunk allocation when adding/updating dev extent, that is where the deadlock comes from. If we use SYSTEM metadata to update device tree, we can avoid the recursive stuff. Reported-by: Jim Schutt

Reserve metadata space for extent tree, checksum tree and root tree Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:26:38.327697818 +0800 +++ 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:30:01.883697869 +0800 @@ -682,21 +682,15 @@ struct btrfs_space_info { u64 bytes_reserved; /* total bytes the allocator has

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:

This is a first draft of a subvolume quota implementation. It is possible to limit subvolumes and any group of subvolumes and also to track the amount of space that will get freed when deleting snapshots. The current version is functionally incomplete, with the main missing feature being the initial scan and rescan of an existing filesystem. I put some effort into writing an introduction into

I''ve been working to try to improve the write-ahead log''s performance, and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items, especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file. Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or the last

There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the transaction commitment failed. - access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction

This patch fixes the following problem: - If we failed to deal with the delayed dir items, we should abort transaction, just as its comment said. Fix it. - If root reference or root back reference insertion failed, we should abort transaction. Fix it. - Fix the double free problem of pending->inherit. - Do not restore the trans->rsv if we doesn''t change it. - make the error path

If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

These are all the cases where a variable is set, but not read which are really bugs. - Couple of incorrect error handling fixed. - One incorrect use of a allocation policy - Some other things Still needs more review. Found by gcc 4.6''s new warnings Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> ---

Hi I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd, kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5. Best Regards, martin [ 5472.099766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3 [ 5472.099842] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit psmouse sp5100_tco

The original truncation of btrfs has a bug, that is the orphan item will not be dropped when the truncation fails. This bug will trigger BUG() when unlink that truncated file. And besides that, if the user does pre-allocation for the file which is truncated unsuccessfully, after re-mount(umount-mount, not -o remount), the pre-allocated extent will be dropped. This patch modified the relative

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them

When btrfs_start_transaction() fails, we should call btrfs_std_error() properly for filesystem to readonly. (in this patch, forced readonly framework is used) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 ++++++++++- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +++-