similar to: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: use common work instead of delayed work

Lockdep complains about btrfs''s async commit: [ 2372.462171] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 2372.462191] 3.12.0+ #32 Tainted: G W [ 2372.462209] ------------------------------------- [ 2372.462228] ceph-osd/14048 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at: [ 2372.462275] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462305] but there

The freeze rwsem is taken by sb_start_intwrite() and dropped during the commit_ or end_transaction(). In the async case, that happens in a worker thread. Tell lockdep the calling thread is releasing ownership of the rwsem and the async thread is picking it up. Josef and I worked out a more complicated solution that made the async commit thread join and potentially get a later transaction, but

Hi everyone, This patchset is the latest approach I''m using for the Ceph storage daemon to keep track of which data has safely committed to disk. The basic idea is to not use the (problematic) user transaction ioctls at all. Instead, the daemon quiesces its own write requests, initiates an async snapshot, and then continues. The snapshot approach is nice because it provides rollback.

This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return. (but, most callers still use BUG_ON()) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 ++++- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/inode-map.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 ++++-

Hi Chris, This is the extent of my current queue of Btrfs snapshot/subvol/commit stuff. Most of these were posted several months ago. Can be sent upstream during this merge window? Not having this functionality is becoming a bit of a roadblock for our efforts to keep the Ceph data in a consistent state. These patches are also available from

Hi list This happened when running an iozone test over ceph, it was doing lots of random reads. I have no idea how to properly interpret this, I should find it out. Let me know if you need something else. Thanks! [69003.803272] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69003.807987] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:6230! [69003.807987] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [69003.807987] last sysfs file:

If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be blocked to commit because of this orphan handler. We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4

Hello, I''m seeing a lot of warnings in dmesg with a BTRFS filesystem. I''m using the 3.1 kernel, I found a patch for these warnings ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2) <http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2>, but that patch has already been included in 3.1. Are there any other patches I can try? I''m using

Hi I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd, kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5. Best Regards, martin [ 5472.099766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3 [ 5472.099842] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit psmouse sp5100_tco

When btrfs_start_transaction() fails, we should call btrfs_std_error() properly for filesystem to readonly. (in this patch, forced readonly framework is used) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 ++++++++++- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +++-

The type of some functions that return only 0 is changed to ''void''. In addition, the check on the return value in the caller of these functions becomes unnecessary. So, these check is removed. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 17 ++++-------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 4 +- fs/btrfs/compression.c | 14 ++++------

The reason the deadlock is that: Task Btrfs-cleaner umount() down_write(&s->s_umount) sync_filesystem() do auto-defragment and produce lots of dirty pages close_ctree() wait for the end of btrfs-cleaner start_transaction reserve space shrink_delalloc() writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle()

Hi, we are running a ceph cluster with btrfs as it''s base filesystem (kernel 3.0). At the beginning everything worked very well, but after a few days (2-3) things are getting very slow. When I look at the object store servers I see heavy disk-i/o on the btrfs filesystems (disk utilization is between 60% and 100%). I also did some tracing on the Cepp-Object-Store-Daemon, but I''m

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct (base.vma_node) instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c index 3c3cc46..42a8fb2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c @@ -177,6 +177,7

This patch is still not creating elf32_x86_64 objects. No idea why. :( It does however, fix elf_x86_64 (-m64) code generation on x32 hosts which is nice. :) --- ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td.orig 2013-05-16 21:51:51.286129820 +0000 +++ ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 2013-05-16 21:53:24.875004239 +0000 @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ HelpText<"Enable hexagon-qdsp6

From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> Before virtio-ccw could get away with not using DMA API for the pieces of memory it does ccw I/O with. With protected virtualization this has to change, since the hypervisor needs to read and sometimes also write these pieces of memory. The hypervisor is supposed to poke the classic notifiers, if these are used, out of band with regards to ccw