similar to: btrfs-convert complains that fs is mounted even if it isn't

Hi all, I'm setting up Centos4.2 on 2x80GB SATA drives. The partition scheme is like this: /boot = 300MB / = 9.2GB /home = 70GB swap = 500MB The RAID is RAID 1. md0 = 300MB = /boot md1 = 9.2GB = LVM md2 = 70GB = LVM md3 = 500MB = LVM Now, the confusing part is: 1. When creating VolGroup00, should I include all PV (md1, md2, md3)? Then create the LV. 2. When setting up RAID 1, should I

I installed Centos 6.x 64 bit with the minimal ISO and used two disks in RAID 1 array. Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 97G 918M 91G 1% / tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm /dev/md1 485M 54M 407M 12% /boot /dev/md3 3.4T 198M 3.2T 1% /vz Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1] 511936 blocks super 1.0

I am running a series of candidate mixed models using lmer (package lme4) and I'd like to be able to compile a list of the AIC scores for those models so that I can quickly summarize and rank the models by AIC. When I do logistic regression, I can easily generate this kind of list by creating the model objects using glm, and doing: > md <- c("md1.lr", "md2.lr",

CentOS 5, original kernel (xen and normal) and everything, Linux RAID 1. I rebooted one of my machines after doing some changes to RAID/LVM and now the two RAID partitions that I made changes to are "gone". I cannot boot into the system. On bootup it tells me that the devices md2 and md3 are busy or mounted and drops me to the repair shell. When I run fs check manually it just tells

Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 sda,sdd -> 36 GB 10k SCSI HDDs sdb,sde -> 18 GB 10k SCSI HDDs I have added 2 36 GB 10K SCSI drives in it, they are detected as sdc and sdf. What should I do if I

Hi, I have a rebalance that has failed on one peer twice now. Rebalance logs below (directories anonomised and some irrelevant log lines cut). It looks like it loses connection to the brick, but immediately stops the rebalance on that peer instead of waiting for reconnection - which happens a second or so later. Is this normal behaviour? So far it has been the same server and the same (remote)

Hi > Continuing this thread, and focusing on RAID1. > > I got an HPE Proliant gen10+ that has hardware RAID support.? (can turn > it off if I want). What exact model of RAID controller is this? If it's a S100i SR Gen10 then it's not hardware RAID at all. > > I am planning two groupings of RAID1 (it has 4 bays). > > There is also an internal USB boot port. >

I cannot calculate the number of files normally Through df -i I got the approximate number of files is 63694442 [root at CentOS-73-64-minimal ~]# df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/md2 131981312 30901030 101080282 24% / devtmpfs 8192893 435 8192458 1% /dev tmpfs

Dear All, My servers running on CentOS 5.5 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18.194.17.4.el gigabyte motherboard and 2 harddisks (seagate 500GB). My CentOS box configured RAID 1, yesterday and today I had the same problem on 2 servers with same configuration. See the following error messages for details: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem. EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during

Somewhere, mdadm is cacheing information. Here is my /etc/mdadm.conf file: more /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda DEVICE partitions MAILADDR root ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 metadata=0.90 UUID=55ff58b2:0abb5bad:42911890:5950dfce ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 metadata=0.90 UUID=315eaf5c:776c85bd:5fa8189c:68a99382 ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2

On 17 October 2017 at 14:48, Stephen Remde <stephen.remde at gaist.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a rebalance that has failed on one peer twice now. Rebalance logs below (directories anonomised and some irrelevant log lines cut). It looks like it loses connection to the brick, but immediately stops the rebalance on that peer instead of waiting for reconnection - which happens

Hello all, I have 2 x 250GB sata disks (sda and sdb). # fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 14939 119997486 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 14940 29878

Hi, I have a RAID 1 (using mdadm) on CentOS Linux and in /proc/mdstat I see this: md7 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 26627648 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md3 : active raid1 sdb6[1] sda6[0] 4192832 blocks [2/2]

Hi, I have a system with two IDE controllers running RAID1. As a test I powered down, removed one drive (hdc), and powered back up. System came up fine, so powered down installed a new drive (hdc) And powered back up. /proc/mdstat indicatd RAID1 active with hda only. I thought it would Auto add the new hdc drive... Also when I removed the new drive and added The original hdc, the swap partitions

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access

Nithya, Is there any way to increase the logging level of the brick? There is nothing obvious (to me) in the log (see below for the same time period as the latest rebalance failure). This is the only brick on that server that has disconnects like this. Steve [2017-10-17 02:22:13.453575] I [MSGID: 115029] [server-handshake.c:692:server_setvolume] 0-video-server: accepted client from

Hi all! After upgrading to Squeeze, I am watching a Xen VMHost that after a while it hangs. This did not happen when I was using Xen with Debian Lenny (in this case as with Squeeze, the Xen components are from Debian repositories). In each case I connected a keyboard and monitor to the computer and the screen remained black without answering any key. This problem seems to also affect domUs,

So I'm trying to RAID-1 this system which has two identical disks installed in it, and it isn't working for some reason. I started by doing a CentOS-4 install on /dev/sda1 as root, and with /dev/sda2 as my swap. I finish the install, yum update, and then I want to make the mirrors. I copy the partition table from one disk to the other: # sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb I create

Hi, This value is an ongoing rough estimate based on the amount of data rebalance has migrated since it started. The values will cange as the rebalance progresses. A few questions: 1. How many files/dirs do you have on this volume? 2. What is the average size of the files? 3. What is the total size of the data on the volume? Can you send us the rebalance log? Thanks, Nithya On 30

Hi Guys, I had a strange problem yesterday and I'm curious as to what everyone thinks. I have a client with a Red Hat Enterprise 2.1 cluster. All quality HP equipment with an MSA 500 storage array acting as the shared storage between the two nodes in the cluster. This cluster is configured for reliability and not load balancing. All work is handled by one node or the other not both.