Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo"
2010 Jan 14
0
[PATCH] Include subvolume= and metadata_ratio= in /cat/proc
Hi all,
this patch include in /proc/mount the info about which subvolume is mounted
and which metadata_ratio value is used.
$ cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
[...]
/dev/sdc /tmp/t4 btrfs rw,relatime,metadata_ratio=20 0 0
/dev/sdc /mnt/btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,degraded,metadata_ratio=20,subvol=snap-
of-root 0 0
BR
G.Baroncelli
commit 3d7ea7bbd70a66c4d0f369b2879c503b722e8834
Author:
2013 Oct 14
0
mountinfo discrepancy, subvol vs subvolid
When mounting a subvolume by name, mountinfo shows the name of the subvolume. When mounting a subvolume using subvolid it does not. Seems like a problem when trying to determine what is mounted.
-o subvol=<name>
# cat /proc/self/mountinfo | grep vda
43 34 0:29 /home /home rw,relatime shared:29 - btrfs /dev/vda1 rw,seclabel,space_cache
44 34 0:29 /boot /boot rw,relatime shared:30 - btrfs
2010 Dec 14
0
[PATCH] BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH: store and use the last key found
Hi all,
following the thread about the BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH ioctl [1], I made a patch
which try to address the problem of restarting the ioctl.
In the current solution is the application during the restart of the search to
fill the min_* fields in the "struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key". In general the
values set are the last one returned "+1". But doing so we reduce the
2012 Jun 20
8
[PATCH] Allow cross subvolume reflinks (2nd attempt)
Hello,
This is the second attempt to bring in cross subvolume reflinks into btrfs.
The first attempt was NAKed due to missing vfs mount checks and a clear
description of what btrfs subvolumes are and probably also why cross
subvolume reflinks are ok in the case of btrfs. This version of the patch
comes from David and is in SUSE kernels since a long time, so it is tested
and working. The patch
2010 Dec 11
1
[RFC] Improve btrfs subvolume find-new command
Hi all,
enclose a patch to improve the "btrfs subvolume find-new" command. This is a
RFC because it is not finished, but it is an usable state and may be
discussed. The aim of this patch is:
- take in account not only an update of the extent but also an update of the
inode and xattr (which includes the acl)
- extract the generation reference number directly from a snapshot
The new
2013 Nov 16
16
[PATCH] BTRFS-PROG: recursively subvolume snapshot and delete
Hi All,
the following patches implement the recursively snapshotting and
deleting of a subvolume.
To snapshot recursively you must pass the -R switch:
# btrfs subvolume create sub1
Create subvolume ''./sub1''
# btrfs subvolume create sub1/sub2
Create subvolume ''sub1/sub2''
# btrfs subvolume snapshot -R sub1 sub1-snap
Create a snapshot of
2011 Jul 12
0
[PATCH]: Use a general way to get the default subvolume for btrfs
>From 03115f064be2e074d84f4e2105d2cdebde10f6ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang at intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:53:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Use a general way to get the default subvolume for btrfs
---
extlinux/btrfs.h | 105 +++++++++++++++++++
extlinux/main.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 377 insertions(+),
2010 May 19
10
R: default subvolume abilities/restrictions
Hi Anthony,
I think that for you may be interested to read this thread
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2009/11/20/6588643/thread
and to read a my blog about this argument
http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html
Regards
Goffredo
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: anthony@extof.me
>Data: 19/05/2010 8.50
>A:
2010 Oct 25
2
[PATCH] Btrfs: allow subvol deletion by unprivileged user with -o user_subvol_rm_allowed
Add a mount option user_subvol_rm_allowed that allows users to delete a
(potentially non-empty!) subvol when they would otherwise we allowed to do
an rmdir(2). We duplicate the may_delete() checks from the core VFS code
to implement identical security checks (minus the directory size check).
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |
2012 Jul 05
7
[RFC] Btrfs "sendshots" and hidden snapshots
Hello all,
in IRC we had a discussion on how we could solve sending live
subvolumes and how to send subvolumes without the need to
administrate/keep old snapshots for incremental sends. One of the
ideas was to introduce "sendshots", which are basically snapshots
where no refs are counted for file data. This means, that when file
data is changed in the sendshot origin, we do not consume
2012 Oct 25
46
[RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df".
The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a
general consensus about the wording.
Moreover I still didn''t understand how btrfs was using the disks.
A my first attempt was to develop a new command which shows how the
disks
2010 Feb 22
3
Re: [PATCH 0/3 V3] btrfs: a new tool to manage a btrfs filesystem
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@gmail.com> wrote:
> filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem>
-filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem>
+filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <dev>
This command works on devices, not paths.
> Resize a filesystem identified by <path>. The
2016 Aug 25
1
[PATCH] inspection: Fix parsing of btrfs subvolumes in /etc/fstab.
The code to parse btrfs subvol entries in /etc/fstab failed if the
entry had more than one comma-separated option, for example:
/dev/sda4 /home btrfs rw,user,subvol=foo 0 0
This commit fixes that code to use Augeas correctly.
Fixes commit 7ba0e10501f23358c38939930d613bf2393d744d.
Reported by: Zhongfu Li
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/1615337
---
2010 Jan 22
1
R: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed
Hi Thomas,
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: thomas@kupper.org
>Data: 22/01/2010 10.48
>A: "Leszek Ciesielski"<skolima@gmail.com>
>Cc: "linux-btrfs"<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
>Ogg: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed
>
>
>On 22 Jan 2010, at 10:40, Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM,
2013 Nov 14
2
is mounting subvolumes with a read-only root subvolume allowed?
Hi,
I have a box with / and /home being subvolumes from the same btrfs filesystem.
/etc/fstab:
UUID=c0686... / btrfs subvol=root,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 1 1
UUID=c0686... /home btrfs subvol=home,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 1 1
...
/ is initially mounted readonly by the initramfs, and then after switching
to the real system, /home is attempted to be mounted in parallel with /
2010 Nov 30
1
R: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Add ioctl to set snapshot readonly/writable
Hi Li,
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com
>Data: 30/11/2010 8.03
>A: <kreijack@libero.it>
>Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
>Ogg: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Add ioctl to set snapshot readonly/writable
>
>Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Hi Li,
>>
>> On Monday, 29 November, 2010, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> This allows us to set
2012 Sep 06
0
[PATCH V3 0/7 ] Btrfs-progs: enhance btrfs subvol list only to show read-only snapshots
We want ''btrfs subvolume list'' only to list readonly subvolumes, this patch set
introduces a new option ''r'' to implement it.
You can use the command like that:
btrfs subvolume list -r <mnt>
Changelog v2 -> v3:
- re-implement list_subvols()
- re-implement this read-only subvolume list function based on the new list_subvols()
Changelog v1 -> v2:
-
2011 Oct 19
1
[RFC] aptitude & BTRFS slowness
Hi all,
I suffered a lot for the terrific performance of aptitude on a BTRFS filesystem.
I don''t think that BTRFS is a slow filesystem, but it seems that some aptitude
(or dpkg) patterns are capable to highlight the btrfs slowness in some corner
case.
In order to alleviate this problem, I wrote a small script which calls
aptitude with the LD_PRELOAD libeatmyadata library. And now I
2010 Oct 25
14
[PATCH 0/6] Btrfs commit fixes, async subvol operations
Hi Chris,
This is the extent of my current queue of Btrfs snapshot/subvol/commit
stuff. Most of these were posted several months ago. Can be sent
upstream during this merge window? Not having this functionality is
becoming a bit of a roadblock for our efforts to keep the Ceph data in a
consistent state.
These patches are also available from
2005 Jan 27
1
klibc/ash doesn't compile
Hi,
on my system the klibc/ash ( 0.197 ) doesn't compile:
[ghigo@therra ash]$ pwd
/home/ghigo/klibc/klibc-0.197/ash
[ghigo@therra ash]$ make
[...]
gcc -Wp,-MD,.arith_lex.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g
-falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix
include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32
-I../include