similar to: [PATCH] E2fsprogs: add missing usage for No_COW

Add the missing usage for No_COW since we''ve supported No_COW flag. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- v1->v2: sort options alphabetically, thanks to Roman Mamedov. misc/chattr.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/misc/chattr.c b/misc/chattr.c index 141ea6e..24254cc 100644 --- a/misc/chattr.c +++ b/misc/chattr.c @@ -83,7

I want to eliminate the COW feature on all of my OS files. It is a nice feature for user files, but I don''t see a clear benefit for the actual OS files. And I suspect that COW induced fragmentation is causing or aggravating problems with my system including the boot open_ctree problem. I had planned to recursively chattr these files to "nodatacow" status but then I ran

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:02:59PM +0200, Yonatan Shtarkman wrote: > The attached code snippet?reproduces the issue when running: > python3 libugestfs_segfault_repro.py > > With: > guestfs version: 1.48.6 > guestfs-python version: 1.48.6 Can confirm with {python3-,}libguestfs-1.51.1-1.fc39.x86_64 The stack trace is roughly the same as yours. Rich. > Stacktrace: > #0

(cross-posted on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78022766) Hi all, I'm trying to compile R as a static library with the -fPIC flag so I can use it within java+JNI (is it only possible ?), but I cannot find the right flags in '.configure' to compile R this way. I tested various flags but I cannot find the correct syntax. for now, my latest attempt was ``` rm -rvf?

In clear_extent_bit, it is enough that next node is adjacent in tree level. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index fcf77e1..e941cc4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -577,8 +577,7 @@ hit_next: if

If I were to lose my main hard drive, I would like to have the opportunity to do the same as I can do using Windows: restore from my USB and have a working system. If I were to rsync everything on the main drive (excluding the backup drive, of course and a few other directories) to my USB drive, could I restore using some CD based version of Linux e.g. Knoppix? Todd -- Ariste Software 2200

From: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Fix return value to get from read_extent_buffer_pages(). Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 6632e5c..35916d5 100644 ---

Our code is not ready to cope with a sectorsize that''s not equal to PAGE_SIZE. It will lead to hanging-on while writing something. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 20196f4..b9866f2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++

I''ve been working to try to improve the write-ahead log''s performance, and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items, especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file. Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or the last

Since there is a filesystem state, we should deal with it carefully at mount, umount and remount. - At mount, the FS state should be checked if there is error on these FS. If it does have, btrfsck is recommended. - At umount, the FS state should be saved into disk for consistency. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 47

Hello there, tl;dr: Is it a known behaviour that using llvm-3.4 and llvm-3.6 at the same time in the same process (while llvm-3.6 is used from a linked shared library and llvm-3.4 is dlopen'ed - with a strange detail: Especially if -rdynamic is used when linking the program). If so, is there a workaround? If not, can it be fixed in llvm-3.6? Long story: I am writing a program that creates

While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not perform well enough. Here is a scenario in fio jobs: We have 4 threads, "t1 t2 t3 t4", starting to buffer read a same file, and all of them will race on add_to_page_cache_lru(), and if one thread successfully puts its page into the page cache, it takes the responsibility to read the page''s data. And

I have a 3 disk raid1 filesystem mounted with nodatacow. I have a folder in said filesystem with the ''C'' NOCOW & ''Z'' Not_Compressed flags set for good measure. I then copy in a large file and proceed to make random modifications. Filefrag shows no additional extents created, good so far. A big thank you to the those devs who got that working. However, after

Setting subvolume/snapshot readonly has been missing for a long time. With this patch, we can set a subvolume/snapshot readonly via: o btrfs subvolume set-ro <path> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- cmds-subvolume.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ioctl.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi Dongyang, Yan, When testing BTRFS with RAID 0 metadata on linux-3.3, we see discard ranges exceeding the end of the block device [1], potentially causing dataloss; when this occurs, filesystem writeback becomes catatonic due to continual resubmission. The reproducer is quite simple [2]. Hope this proves useful... Thanks, Daniel --- [1] attempt to access beyond end of device ram0: rw=129,

Hi, I want to clone my hardisk containing the centos-5.3 OS and its swap region on to new raw hardisk via network either through ssh, tftp or ftp. How do i do that ? Is there any Tool for that or will DD command be sufficient.I know that dd command will have to be used on hardisk with already existing partitions and not on raw disk. Regards, Premraj M Disclaimer : This message is

Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success. I followed these instructions: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories - cloned the repo - symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git - patched version.sh: Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or fix the script). Even with the

While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not perform well enough. Here is a scenario in fio jobs: We have 4 threads, "t1 t2 t3 t4", starting to buffer read a same file, and all of them will race on add_to_page_cache_lru(), and if one thread successfully puts its page into the page cache, it takes the responsibility to read the page''s data. And

Hi there, One of the things that I've been doing for fun is to try to speed up ext4's fsck time. As you can see here: http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/08/08/fast-ext4-fsck-times/ Fsck'ing an ext4 filesystem can be between 6-8 times after than the equivalent file hierarchy on ext4. In order to speed it up further, the main place to look is in pass #2, where the directory is

From: Anand <anand.jain@oracle.com> This patch adds creation-time to the snapshot list display, which would help user to better manage the snapshots when number of snapshots grow substantially. This patch is developed and on top of the send/receive btrfs and btrfs-progs repo at git://github.com/ablock84/linux-btrfs.git (send-v2) git://github.com/ablock84/btrfs-progs.git (send-v2)