similar to: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash in scrub repair code when device is missing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash in scrub repair code when device is missing"

2012 May 25
6
[PATCH v5 0/3] Btrfs: add IO error device stats
Changes v1-v2: - Remove restriction that BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEVICE_STATS is a privileged operation - Cast u64 to unsigned long long for printf() Changes v2-v3: - Rebased on Chris'' current master Changes v3-v4: - Add padding at end of ioctl structure Changes v4-v5: - The statistic members in the ioctl are now organized as an array of 64 bit values. Symbolic names for the array indexes
2012 Jan 13
5
Can't resize second device in RAID1
Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all
2018 Mar 16
3
Bug 1442983 on 3.10.11 Unable to acquire lock for gluster volume leading to 'another transaction in progress' error
Hi, I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs 3.8.14) The bug report says fixed in glusterfs-3.12.2-1 Is there a plan to backport the fix to 3.10.x releases or the only way to fix is upgrade to 3.12? Regards, -- Marco Crociani
2018 Apr 09
2
ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")
On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number > of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730
2018 Mar 16
0
Bug 1442983 on 3.10.11 Unable to acquire lock for gluster volume leading to 'another transaction in progress' error
Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani < marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 > on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs
2018 Apr 06
2
ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")
Hi, are there any news for 3.10.12 release? Regards, -- Marco Crociani
2007 Jun 16
3
Xen 3.1 in unstable?
Hi, I just happen to see that there are no Xen 3.1 packages in unstable as of yet - even if 3.1 is released since a while now. There are the Packages in Ralph's apt repository, but I wonder why there are no newer packages yet. This shouldn't be criticism, but two questions come up: 1) Is the reason that there are no newer packages that you need some more help? Then I might be able to
2018 Apr 12
1
ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")
On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead.
2018 Mar 17
1
Bug 1442983 on 3.10.11 Unable to acquire lock for gluster volume leading to 'another transaction in progress' error
Hi, this patch it's already available in the community version of gluster 3.12? In which version? If not, there is plan to backport it? Greetings, ??? Paolo Il 16/03/2018 13:24, Atin Mukherjee ha scritto: > Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at > release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at
2018 Apr 06
0
ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")
Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > Hi, > are there any news for 3.10.12 release? > > Regards, >
2018 Apr 09
0
ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")
On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release?
2011 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] Generating superblocks (SEME regions w/o loops and calls) in LLVM
Hi all, While developing compile-time instrumentation for ThreadSanitizer (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test) I need to generate SEME regions without loop and call instructions (I'll call them superblocks hereafter, although some researchers do allow loops in their definition of superblocks). This is necessary to get the largest piece of IR in which the memory operations can be
2008 Feb 01
2
How to read group descriptor?
Hi All, I am trying to read group descriptor from disk. I am able to read the superblock structure successfully. But I am not getting successful to get the group descriptor. Here is my code. Please check out what is missing. #include<linux/ext3_fs.h> #include<sys/types.h> #include<sys/stat.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<fcntl.h>
2015 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Loop Vectorization and Store-Load Forwarding issue
I have been looking into this small test case (Part A) where loop vectorization is disabled due to possible store-load forwarding conflict (Part B). As you can see, due to the presence of dependence distance 2 the loop is vectorizable only for a width of 2. However, the presence of dependence distance 15 (due to y[j-15]) results in store-load forwarding issue as store packet of y[16:17] (iteration
2006 Nov 17
1
gjournal on 6.x wont build
Hi all, I was intending on trying out gjournal on a new disk i've added in my desktop. I had a look to see what the most recent patch provided by Pawel and found http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gjournal6_20061024.patch I created the directories as per Pawel's original post (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-June/001962.html) and the patch succeeded with no failed
2011 Jun 27
1
How to handle badblocks with btrfs?
Hi, I have some errors in dmesg: [ 542.255788] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 [ 542.255797] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 [ 542.255805] ata1.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED [ 542.255821] ata1.00: cmd 60/00:00:1a:b7:7a/04:00:1d:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 524288 in [ 542.255824] res 41/40:00:a0:b7:7a/00:00:1d:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> [
2006 Aug 30
0
xen-linux-system-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 is broken?
Hi, I have updated my debian etch and it stop booting with xen. I see the new 2.6.17 kernel in unstable and so I have installed it but also this doesn't work (it reboots during boot). -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? - http://www.openformats.org * Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org
2007 Aug 31
0
Xen 3.1 AMD64 status and Ubuntu
Hi, I see that there aren't AMD64 packages in unstable. Is ti related to this bug? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439662 In ubuntu it compiles on amd64. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-3.1/3.1.0-0ubuntu15 Is there collaboration between debian xen team and ubuntu xen team? Regards, -- Marco Crociani - Tyrael * Perch? usare Formati Aperti? -
2018 Mar 15
0
glusterd-locks.c:572:glusterd_mgmt_v3_lock
Hi, have you found a solution? Regards, -- Marco Crociani
2008 Sep 11
13
PV-GRUB - Does not read partition-less disk
Hi folks PV-GRUB built from Xen 3.3.0 is not able to read from devices without a partition table: | grubdom> root (hd0) | Filesystem type unknown, using whole disk Part of the config: | disk = [ "phy:vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root,xvda,w" ] Device: | # file -s /dev/vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root | /dev/vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root: symbolic link to