similar to: Snapper packages for Ubuntu

sorry forgot to follow the protocol, now included RFC in the subject. Hi, Appears that no one is working on the auto-snapshot feature for btrfs, so here I am implementing the same. Below is a draft on the feature list. Any comments / questions / suggestions are welcome, please do let me know. btrfs auto snapshot feature will include: Initially: - configurable timely

Hello, We''re a team of 4 final year computer science students and are working on generating a diff between file system snapshots using the send receive code. The output of our utility looks like this- (I''ve tested it on a small subvol with minimal changes just to give an idea) root@nafisa-M-6319:/mnt/btrfs# btrfs sub diff -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2

Hi, for a backup program I have to find all differing files (including metadata) in two snapshots taken from the same subvolume. Having looked at the find-new command I thought about this process: 1. Get the two transids when the two snapshots were created. 2. Query modifications to the original subvolume between the two transids. Is the general process corrent or have I overseen

Hello Guys, While i work out the snapper on fedora 25 I've learnd more about python and snapper. Here the changes: Snapper: Created a combat util-linux 2.24.2 from fedora 20, static only. This make snapper rollback available (needfull thing). Tryed to patch snapper, there are to many changes. This will not breake centos 7 system. Only works for x86 / amd64 only this days & Centos 7,

Hello Guys, Last Sunday I had the idea to expand my gameplay btrfs. Now what was missing was a yum plugin which worked like arch or opensuse. Ok, I told myself and learned a little python. Also something for grub2 to boot into a snapshot. My results are up on: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/Centos7Btrfs/ grub2-btrfs (do not use grub-btrfs, this is the version before)

My setup is Samba/smbclient version 3.0.1 on linux RedHat 9. \\snapper\dfs is a dfs share on snapper, a Win2k3 Active Directory server. My smb.conf contains: [global] realm = ciswinnet.cis.uab.edu workgroup=CISWINNET security = ADS encrypt passwords = yes password server = snapper.cis.uab.edu client use spnego = yes I am trying to run the following command: smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs

Am 20.06.24 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > >> opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well > > Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896 > > comment 2 might point out the actual

Am 20.06.24 um 17:51 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > So my alternative might be dropping snapper and do the btrfs-snapshots > plus the rotation etc with self-written (=copied) scripts and timers. > > vfs_shadow_copy2 worked in my tests, I only switched to vfs_snapper > because it looked promising to have all the rotation and cleanup of > snapshots done by snapper

I have a script that normally runs my snapshot that I haven't used for the past several days because something seemed to be going wrong and I wanted to run things manually. But running the script twice today, I got: > snaphome Found 15 mounted dated, snaps or snap archives ?[snapper#2120]base_mp=/home 1 snap dated today. (Use: '--force=force_create_snap' to force another snap.)

is this module still maintained and working? https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_snapper.8.html starting to set up the pieces, I have snapshots in btrfs with snapper itself but so far nothing visible on the windows explorer side. As always I rtfm all over ;-) I assume I have to do some extra magic to allow the winbind users/groups in ... in the related snapper-config I

Sorry Hughes, got some questions. I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel at lists.fedoraproject

Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896 comment 2 might point out the actual issue with the code, I don't know

Am 19.06.24 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Where are you getting this from ? :-) > If I run this in a terminal: > > ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" ; echo "$ALLOW_GROUPS" > > I get this: > > domain\ admins > > Note that the

Am 19.06.24 um 12:46 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 19.06.24 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" >> ??????????????? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> ??????????????? Where are you getting this from ? > > :-) > >> If I run this in a terminal: >> >> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" ;

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:59:41 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 19.06.24 um 11:35 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > >>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough? > >> > >> No, because they would

(Samba 3.0.1, RedHat 9, share is a w2k3, security = ADS) Here is a snippet of debug level 3 output of an smbclient tar operation, with error at the end. Command is: # smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs <password> -U Administrator -E -W CISWINNET -D home -d3 -Tqca /tmp/test.tar [2004/01/14 15:05:10, 3] lib/util.c:dos_clean_name(549) dos_clean_name

Addendum: Grub2-btrfs: %changelog +* Sun Jul 02 2017 andreas at benzlerweb.de 1.11 - 5 +- harmonized_snapshots_entry now dertemite efi / bios patch, + this should be used for redhat based distros I think the project is finished. Maybe I would do well to create a little description. We will see... Sincerely Andy

Am 19.06.24 um 11:35 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough? >> >> No, because they would be classed as 'others'. >> >>> >>> Or does "SYNC_ACL" not yet work OK, because we miss the steps in

Hello list, following the guidance from here (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) I have set up a file server which is member of a Samba 4.6.9 AD domain. I have created ACLs using a Windows client with a domain admin account. While I have no issues with some folders, the server denies access to others to users that should have access by means of group

From: anand jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Anand Jain (1): [RFC] Add btrfs autosnap feature Makefile | 6 +- autosnap.c | 1553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ autosnap.h | 81 +++ btrfs-list.c | 140 +++++- btrfs.c | 46 ++- btrfs_cmds.c | 186 +++++++- btrfs_cmds.h | 3 +- scrub.c | 1 + 8 files changed, 1982 insertions(+), 34