similar to: attempt to access beyond end of device and livelock

Hello. Sorry for writing to btrfs mailing list, but personal mail reject my message. Saying " <chris.mason@fusionio.com>: host 10.101.1.19[10.101.1.19] said: 554 5.4.6 Hop count exceeded - possible mail loop (in reply to end of DATA command) Final-Recipient: rfc822; chris.mason@fusionio.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Spam-&-Virus-Firewall; host

We''ve been working on getting XEN 4.1.2 validated for internal use and have run into what appears to be a livelock induced failure in properly freeing a blktap2 device. We ported the blktap2 driver from Dan Stodden''s GIT tree into 3.2.x which is a reasonably straight forward process. We are also running the toolchain with a patch which Ian Campbell posted in order to get xl to

Am 05.02.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: >>> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? >>> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >>> to move them. > >> You are right moving the mail should be simple. > >>

> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? > Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE > to move them. You are right moving the mail should be simple. I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail itself. Thomas

I recently got a new SSD (ocz vertex LE 50gb) It seems to work really well as a ZIL performance wise. My question is, how safe is it? I know it doesn''t have a supercap so lets'' say dataloss occurs....is it just dataloss or is it pool loss? also, does the fact that i have a UPS matter? the numbers i''m seeing are really nice....these are some nfs tar times before

Hi, I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. Use case: - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be moved to a different location for these 5 days. - After 5 days the mail should be moved to my inbox again. How

Hi HPA et al, When moving from syslinux 4.06 to 5.01, I found serial output isn't working. The issue reproduces simply [1] and I get back serial output when I move back to syslinux 4.06. I also see a regression in booting locally with 'localboot 0' which give a generic 'failed' error message; likely reproducible there also. Let me know if you need more information and

Am 04.02.2015 um 07:49 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > >> I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. > >> Use case: > >> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. >> - Now I want to have some sort of

Previously when firefox went catatonic to the point that I could not even scroll, its CPU usage had gone to 100%+. Now top tells me that firefox, Web Content (with a space) or sometimes kswap... has process state D, uninterruptable sleep. Any suggestions on how to deal? I often have a lot of tabs open, so discovering the right one was hard enough before. Usually, it was something relatively new,

On 9 February 2014 02:57, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: >> Interestingly, there was graphical failure booting 3.6.11, even >> nvidia-current fails to initialise, but these two issues could be due >> to running the Xorg stack in Ubuntu 14.04 pre-release. Using >>

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at 1degreenorth.com> wrote: > On 27/05/2013 17:53, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >> Daniel J Blueman <daniel at 1degreenorth.com> writes: >> >>> When moving from syslinux 4.06 to 5.01, I found serial output isn't >>> working. The issue reproduces simply [1] and I get back serial output

Guten Tag! I have Samba 225 on a network of 75-100 daily users. System has (4) SCSI drives: (2) 18GB (RAID-1) and (2) 36GB (RAID-1) on two different SCSI channels. The system is running Red Hat 7.3 with updated and recompiled Samba 2.25 package. After one day of operation, the SMBD process is listed in "ps -A" ten to fifteen times, and some client PCs cannot connect. There

Excellent description, thank you. With performance.write-behind-trickling-writes ON (default): ## 4k randwrite # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=32 --size=256MB --readwrite=randwrite test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32 fio-3.1 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1

Does BTRFS perform any journal and/or filesystem structure alignment (for benefit to SSD longevity and SSD, RAID array and large-sector device performance) at present? ext4''s Ted Tso will deliver 128KB alignment with the next release of e2fsprogs (ie 1.41.4) [1], so perhaps it''s a good idea for btrfsprogs also, if not already available? Daniel --- [1]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58305 Priority: medium Bug ID: 58305 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Kernel crashes if nVidia card is powered off and X restartted QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

On 8 February 2014 16:33, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> With a GeForce 320M GPU running linux 3.13.2 and Xorg 1.15.0, I'm >> seeing significant graphical corruption and later unrecoverable GPU >> lockup, accompanied by thousands of

Having done a current checkout, creating a new FS and running iozone [1] on it results in an oops [2]. remove_suid is called, accessing offset 14 of a NULL pointer. Let me know if you''d like me to test any fix, do further debugging or get more information. Thanks, Daniel --- [1] # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt /mnt# iozone -a . --- [2] [ 899.118926] BUG: unable to

Hi, I Configured 3 Clusters (For several Shared Homes between different maschines) .. So far no Problem. Now it need a Volume that going across this maschines, but the nodes are bound to there own clusters so peer probe fails . How i can build one big cluster with all nodes but without dataloss (And best without Downtime J) Hope there is some Pro that can help J Greets from Germany

When testing out 16KB blocks with direct I/O [1] on 3.3-rc6, we quickly see btrfs_search_slot returning positive numbers, popping an assertion [2]. Are >4KB block sizes known broken for now? Thanks, Daniel --- [1] mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 -l 16k -n 16k /dev/sda /dev/sdb mount /dev/sda /store && cd /store fio /usr/share/doc/fio/examples/iometer-file-access-server --- [2]

It looks like Ryan's Nouveau patch [1,2] to get the I2C working for EDID (thus modelines) is crucial for avoiding the Nvidia binary drivers on MacbookPro 2012s. Any plans/chance for it to be upstreamed to eg 3.6-rc3? Many thanks, Daniel --- [1] diff -urNp a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c