similar to: Copy and remove performance impacted by COW reflink rewrite (2)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 Summary: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at shubin.ca

Hi, how can I do the following in a shell script: - check whether my file system supports cp --reflink? - check whether two files share the same data on disk, i.e. one has been created by cp --reflink of the other? Thank you! Thomas Koch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Hello, It's happens around 40 calls and above ? The **machine** accepts number of invites(we can see by tcpdump ) , but asterisk sees part of them (we can see by CLI log) , and when it does , asterisk accepting an invite it reply the initator. (as it should ) ? but the rest of invites are just ignored. it's seems like an O/S issue, because on asterisk level I can all going

Hellow, everyone I'm from HuaWei, China. We are looking for the candidate of virtualization platform among several vendors. Learned from Oracle people, the latest version of ocfs2 has integrated reflink feature which was commited to the the linux 2.6.32 kernel. But as we know, the sles11 integrated the linux 2.6.27 kernle, so the relink feature is not avaiable on the sles11 platform. We

It''s been nearly a year since the patches needed to implement a reflinked copy between subvolumes have been posted (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/9865 ) and I still get "Invalid cross-device link" error with Linux 3.2.4 while I try to do a cp --reflink between subvolumes. This is a *very* useful feature to have (think offline file-level

In reflink we update the id info in the disk but forget to update the corresponding information in the VFS inode. So update them accordingly in case we want to preserve the attributes. Reported-by: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

* Sage Weil (sage@newdream.net) [091216 17:55]: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Li Dongyang wrote: > > > Have a look at line 998, ioctl.c, inside btrfs_ioctl_clone(), > > the src->i_size(the size of the testfile created by touch) is just 0, and this > > will cause btrfs_ioctl_clone just return -EINVAL. > > I''m not sure if it makes sense to clone a file which

It would still be downloading the whole file only to write out a new one. Rsync writes out a whole new file because it assumes it is doing so locally. The source of that new file can be a combination of parts of the existing file and parts of the remote file but it still writes the whole thing. --inplace helps with that somewhat but you will probably still write all of the file after the first

Hi, i have some virtual machines running on logical volumes formatted with OCFS2. I'd like to snapshot the running guests to backup them easily afterwards. The files of the guests are big (100 - 300GB), but the content changes only slowly. So i thought that rsync would be a great benefit because it justs transfers the difference between the current file and the one backuped one day before. I

I am testing a Btrfs root file system with Debian (kernel 2.6.32) under KVM. jason@vrtl:~$ touch testfile jason@vrtl:~$ cp --reflink testfile /tmp cp: failed to clone `/tmp/testfile'': Invalid argument This is with GNU Coreutils 8.0 taken from debian Sid. Is this a Coreutils issue, a Btrfs problem or something in my local configuration? All the other issues that I have encountered so

Dear all I'm realy new to R, so I hope you can help me, as I didn't find any solution in the common books. Since some days I'm trying to create the following plot: A scatterplott showning two different groups side-by-side with according regression lines. Both datasets only have the same five factors, so the scatters will form a kind of column at each factor. When I use

no backup - no mercy ----- On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rubson at gmail.com wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay >> bytes to the file from the day before. >> But it doesn't: >> >> ha-idg-1:/cluster/guests/servers_alive # time rsync -av --stats

--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a little). Local copies force --whole-file for a good reason. On 03/14/2018 10:05 AM, Ben RUBSON via rsync wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> ----- On

Inlined xattr shared free space of inode block with inlined data or data extent record, so the size of the later two should be adjusted when inlined xattr is enabled. See ocfs2_xattr_ibody_init(). But this isn't done well when reflink. For inode with inlined data, its max inlined data size is adjusted in ocfs2_duplicate_inline_data(), no problem. But for inode with data extent record, its

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

I want to make you aware of a possible bug in the reflink handling of btrfs: When I reflink a file larger 2GB (on the same subvol), the reflinking fails. But it works fine for files smaller 2GB in size. I was able to track this down to btrfs with great support of Martin Raiber who created a small demo code: Source: https://urbackup.atlassian.net/secure/attachment/10201/reflink.cpp Compile: g++

Hello, This is the second attempt to bring in cross subvolume reflinks into btrfs. The first attempt was NAKed due to missing vfs mount checks and a clear description of what btrfs subvolumes are and probably also why cross subvolume reflinks are ok in the case of btrfs. This version of the patch comes from David and is in SUSE kernels since a long time, so it is tested and working. The patch

Hi everyone, I described the reflink operation at the Linux Storage & Filesystems Workshop last month. Originally implemented as an ocfs2-specific ioctl, the consensus was that it should be a syscall from the get-go. Here's some first-cut patches. For people who have not seen reflink, either at LSF or on the ocfs2 wiki, the first patch contains Documentation/filesystems/reflink.txt to

>From the online document of ZFS On-Disk Specification, I found there is a field named "dd_parent_obj" in dsl_dir_phys_t. will this field be modified or kept unchanged during snapshot COW? For example, consider a ZFS filesytem mounted on /myzfs, which contains 2 subdirs(A and B). If we do the following steps: 1) create a snapshot named /myzfs at now. 2) rename /myzfs/A to

We don't want to read PTEs directly like this after they have been modified, as a lazy MMU implementation of direct page tables may not have written the updated PTE back to memory yet. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- mm/memory.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1