similar to: btrfsprogs source code

Hello World! I''ve just done a git pull from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git and looking at git log, the last commit was on Wed Oct 6 09:53:38 2010, nearly a year ago. Is this project still maintained? Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt >> booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up >> Google Chrome: >> >> encrypted ext4: ~20s >> btrfs: ~2:11s

I''m trying to compile the btrfs source code but I''m getting an error. Any suggestions? Thanks Joe [root@ol6 btrfs-progs]# uname -a Linux ol6.localdomain 2.6.39-400.17.2.el6uek.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 13 12:31:05 PDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@ol6 src]# git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git Initialized empty Git repository in

Since btrfs does not do recursive atomic snapshots (which I am ok with), I am doing this myself. A handful of suggestions/problems came up. 1. Maybe btrfsprogs could gain an option to do recursive non-atomic snapshots at the userspace level, simply invoking low-level atomic snapshots one by one? For the following, the kernel is 3.4.4 with the too-overloaded "0.19" version of

Creating a btrfs file system using btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19, and either kernel 3.6.10-4.fc18 or 3.9.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc19, makes a file system that cannot be mounted by kernel 3.6.10-4.fc18. It can be mounted by kernel 3.8.4. I haven''t tested any other 3.8, or any 3.7 kernels. Is this expected? dmesg reports: [ 300.014764] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [

I''ve just pushed out a new integration branch to my git repo. This is purely bugfix patches -- there are no new features in this issue of the integration branch. I''ve got a stack of about a dozen more patches with new features in them still to go. I''ll be working on those tomorrow. As always, there''s minimal testing involved here, but it does at least compile on

Hallo, linux-btrfs, First I create an array of 2 disks with mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdd1 and mount it at /srv/MM. Then I fill it with about 1,6 TByte. And then I add /dev/sde1 via btrfs device add /dev/sde1 /srv/MM btrfs filesystem balance /srv/MM (it run about 20 hours) Then I work on it, copy some new files, delete some old files - all works well. Only df

Hi everyone, I''ve updated the master branch with the pending stable btrfs-progs commit that should make the 0.20 release. Thanks to Hugh for helping to queue up a few of them. We''ll have more frequent releases from here as we pull in the major new features going into progs (raid5/6, send/receive, quotas, fsck improvements). Please give it a shot and let me know if you see any

Hi, I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up Google Chrome: encrypted ext4: ~20s btrfs: ~2:11s I have tried different things to find out exactly what is the issue, but haven''t quite found it yet. Here''s some stuff I got from latencytop, not sure if would be helpful:

Hi All, I was wondering if it is possible to NOT show an event in puppet dashboard. I have an exec resource that fires of a ruby script. This is triggering a changed event on every run, but actually I want to exclude this from showing up as "CHANGED" Is this possible, if so how can I achieve this? --- myscript: --- exec { "run_myscript" : #

Hi all, I want to do some code reuse, and modules seem overkill. Is it possible to have something like this? A file called myuser.pp class myuser { user {...} file {...} ... } Then in site.pp have this: node ''foo.example.com'' { include myuser .. other things .. } node ''bar.example.com'' { include myuser .. other things .. } When I try this,

We''ve been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode''s sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik

I''ve got two recent examples of SSDs. Their pristine state from the manufacturer shows: Device Model: OCZ-VERTEX3 # hexdump -C /dev/sdd 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 1bf2976000 Device Model: OCZ VERTEX PLUS (OCZ VERTEX 2E) # hexdump -C /dev/sdd 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| *

Hello All, I wanted to create two two MySQL database with same user credential using Puppet-MySQL. How can I achieve this? Please find my script below. class mysql::vsdatabase { include mysql mysql::db { ''vidispine'': user => ''user'', password => ''user123'', host => ''db.<hostname>.com'', } } How can I add

Hi list, I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b. I have a three disk array of level single: # btrfs fi sh Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.55TB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 2.73TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb

Hello guys, i try to convert ext4 volume, but btrfs-convert show me error: "No valid Btrfs found on file unable to open ctree conversion aborted." Ubuntu 13.04 Kernel: 3.11 btrfs-progs git version 0.20-git20130822~194aa4a13 way to reproduce error: $ truncate -s 4G file $ mkfs.ext4 file #say yes to create fs on non block device. $ btrfs-convert file No valid Btrfs found on file unable

Hi, ppl, I m following the puppet cookbook tutorial. On page 167 to 169 Managing Apache Servers. When I add the: apache::snippet { "site-specific.conf": } I got the error of the title: Could not parse for environment production: Syntax error at ''{''; expected ''}'' at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp:3. Here is my manifests node.pp

Hi, I''ve got some certificate requests on my puppet master that I wish to remove. It looks like the "puppet cert" tool doesn''t have an option for doing that? What''s the best approach, just manually remove them from the puppet/ssl/ca/requests directory? Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984 -- You received this message because

If there is no free space, the free space allocator will try to get space from the block group with the degenerated profile. For example, if there is no free space in the RAID1 block groups, the allocator will try to allocate space from the DUP block groups. And besides that, the space reservation has the similar behaviour: if there is no enough space in the space cache to reserve, it will reserve

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs