similar to: re: Btrfs: fix num_workers_starting bug and other bugs in async thread

Rails instances themselves are almost always single-threaded, whereas Mongrel, and it''s acceptor, are multithreaded. In a situation with long-running Rails pages this presents a problem for mod_proxy_balancer. If num_processors is greater than 1 ( default: 950 ), then Mongrel will gladly accept incoming requests and queue them if its rails instance is currently busy. So even

hello, all of users: sorry, resend it again for clarifying the message. I have implemented cha_ss7 in china. initially, the chan_ss7 can not support the call group. i modify the code. now the problem is that, both sides can hear the ring, but i can not hear the voice from each other. i think the ss7 does not send the voice steam to the destination. in chan_ss7, i added:

From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> If spin_lock_irqsave is called twice in a row with the same second argument, the interrupt state at the point of the second call overwrites the value saved by the first call. Indeed, the second call does not need to save the interrupt state, so it is changed to a simple spin_lock. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:

This small patch extends configure_socket_options to support FreeBSD''s accf_http(9), which defers accept() until there''s a full HTTP request to read. Seems to work fine on 6.1-STABLE. DragonflyBSD should work too provided the /freebsd/ line is modified to match it. accf_http(9): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accf_http&sektion=9 -- Thomas

The type of some functions that return only 0 is changed to ''void''. In addition, the check on the return value in the caller of these functions becomes unnecessary. So, these check is removed. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 17 ++++-------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 4 +- fs/btrfs/compression.c | 14 ++++------

Hello all. I too found out that I sometimes have some action that can take up to 10 seconds in my rails application. I''ve read all arguments Zed made about polling/and inbox strategies, and I think I just can''t work around my feeling that a "wrong" request that takes up too much time should be able to lock subsequent requests in mongrels queue. That''s what

We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation of both host and guest. But it was too aggressive in some cases, since any delay or blocking of a single packet may delay or block the guest transmission. Consider the following setup: +-----+ +-----+ | VM1 | | VM2 | +--+--+

We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation of both host and guest. But it was too aggressive in some cases, since any delay or blocking of a single packet may delay or block the guest transmission. Consider the following setup: +-----+ +-----+ | VM1 | | VM2 | +--+--+

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > As Michael point out, We used to limit the max pending DMAs to get better cache > utilization. But it was not done correctly since it was one done when there's no > new buffers submitted from guest. Guest can easily exceeds the limitation by > keeping sending packets. > > So this patch moves the check into main

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > As Michael point out, We used to limit the max pending DMAs to get better cache > utilization. But it was not done correctly since it was one done when there's no > new buffers submitted from guest. Guest can easily exceeds the limitation by > keeping sending packets. > > So this patch moves the check into main

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to limit the max pending DMAs to prevent guest from pinning too many > pages. But this could be removed since: > > - We have the sk_wmem_alloc check in both tun/macvtap to do the same work > - This max pending check were almost useless since it was one done when there's > no new buffers coming from

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to limit the max pending DMAs to prevent guest from pinning too many > pages. But this could be removed since: > > - We have the sk_wmem_alloc check in both tun/macvtap to do the same work > - This max pending check were almost useless since it was one done when there's > no new buffers coming from

After commit 2b8b328b61c799957a456a5a8dab8cc7dea68575 (vhost_net: handle polling errors when setting backend), we in fact track the polling state through poll->wqh, so there's no need to duplicate the work with an extra vhost_net_polling_state. So this patch removes this and make the code simpler. This patch also removes the all tx starting/stopping code in tx path according to

After commit 2b8b328b61c799957a456a5a8dab8cc7dea68575 (vhost_net: handle polling errors when setting backend), we in fact track the polling state through poll->wqh, so there's no need to duplicate the work with an extra vhost_net_polling_state. So this patch removes this and make the code simpler. This patch also removes the all tx starting/stopping code in tx path according to

Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. Plase review. Thanks Jason Wang (6): vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time vhost_net: poll vhost

Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. Plase review. Thanks Jason Wang (6): vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time vhost_net: poll vhost

We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation of both host and guest. But it was too aggressive in some cases, since any delay or blocking of a single packet may delay or block the guest transmission. Consider the following setup: +-----+ +-----+ | VM1 | | VM2 | +--+--+

We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation of both host and guest. But it was too aggressive in some cases, since any delay or blocking of a single packet may delay or block the guest transmission. Consider the following setup: +-----+ +-----+ | VM1 | | VM2 | +--+--+

I''m pleased to announce the existence of async-observer. This is the very first public release. In the future I''ll confine announcements to the beanstalk-talk mailing list. WHAT IS ASYNC OBSERVER? ----------------------- Async Observer is a Rails plugin that provides deep integration with Beanstalk. beanstalkd is a fast, distributed, in-memory work-queue service. Its

We only need an async starter if we can''t make a GFP_NOFS allocation in our current path. This is the case for the endio stuff since it happens in IRQ context, but things like the caching thread workers and the delalloc flushers we can easily make this allocation and start threads right away. Also change the worker count for the caching thread pool. Traditionally we limited this to 2