similar to: [PATCH] Btrfs: protect orphan block rsv with spin_lock

When adding orphans to an inode''s root, we start a transaction for that root that when ended in several places such as for example extent-tree.c:btrfs_remove_block_group(), inode.c:btrfs_unlink() and inode.c:btrfs_evict_node(), doesn''t result in a commit, that is, inode.c:btrfs_orphan_commit_root() doesn''t get called (via transaction.c:commit_fs_roots()). The respective

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

Hello, I''m seeing a lot of warnings in dmesg with a BTRFS filesystem. I''m using the 3.1 kernel, I found a patch for these warnings ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2) <http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2>, but that patch has already been included in 3.1. Are there any other patches I can try? I''m using

Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:

In fixing how we deal with bad inodes, we had a regression in the orphan cleanup code, since it expects to get a bad inode back. So fix it to deal with getting -ESTALE back by deleting the orphan item manually and moving on. Thanks, Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 36

If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

The original truncation of btrfs has a bug, that is the orphan item will not be dropped when the truncation fails. This bug will trigger BUG() when unlink that truncated file. And besides that, if the user does pre-allocation for the file which is truncated unsuccessfully, after re-mount(umount-mount, not -o remount), the pre-allocated extent will be dropped. This patch modified the relative

I converted btrfs_truncate to do sane reservations for truncate, but didn''t convert btrfs_evict_inode. Basically we need to save the orphan_rsv for deleting the orphan item, and do normal reservations for our truncate. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12

This patch fixes the following problem: - If we failed to deal with the delayed dir items, we should abort transaction, just as its comment said. Fix it. - If root reference or root back reference insertion failed, we should abort transaction. Fix it. - Fix the double free problem of pending->inherit. - Do not restore the trans->rsv if we doesn''t change it. - make the error path

Hi I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd, kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5. Best Regards, martin [ 5472.099766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3 [ 5472.099842] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit psmouse sp5100_tco

There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the transaction commitment failed. - access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Remove the tracking of device which could not be probed because their IOMMU is not probed yet. Replace it with a call to bus_iommu_probe() when a new IOMMU is probed. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 54 +++----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> 240f62c8756 replaced the node_lock with rcu_read_lock, but forgot to remove the actual lock in the data structure. Remove it here. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index

Hi, my system suddenly crashed and gave me this dump: http://imgur.com/oO6S0 I checked and there is not btrfs commit in linus'' tree since I compiled this kernel. Gustavo

I'm trying to get RSV-S8 working with Citrix XenServer 5 update 3 (which I believe runs CentOS 5.something). I have the Rosewill card that comes with it in there (sil3132 based). It's seeing the card, and seeing all my drives. I fdisk the drives and I can create the partitions, but I am unable to set up either software raid or create filesystems. I keep getting errors saying that

I already posted this in the thread "ENOSPC with mkdir and rename", but now I have a device with 100GB unallocated on the "btrfs fi sh" output, and when I run a rebalance of the form: > btrfs filesystem balance start -dusage=50 -musage=10 "$mount" I get more than 75 of such stack traces contaminating the klog. I've put some of them up in a gist here:

- RAID10 btrfs volume consisting of 4 disks. - One disk failed, was replaced, resync started (`btrfs dev add /dev/sdf /srv; btrfs dev del missing /srv`) - Another disk failed before resync was done. Disk was replaced, resync restarted. (`btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /srv; btrfs dev del missing /srv`) Naturally I don''t expect it to recover from 2 failures, but doing the attempt was

The WARN_ON() in start_transaction() was triggered while balancing. The cause is btrfs_relocate_chunk() started a transaction and then called iput() on the inode that stores free space cache, and iput() called btrfs_start_transaction() again. Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 files

I''ve been working to try to improve the write-ahead log''s performance, and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items, especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file. Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or the last

When btrfs_start_transaction() fails, we should call btrfs_std_error() properly for filesystem to readonly. (in this patch, forced readonly framework is used) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 ++++++++++- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +++-