similar to: [RFC] aptitude & BTRFS slowness

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[RFC] aptitude & BTRFS slowness"

2010 Feb 17
0
[PATCH 2/2 V2] btrfs, a new tool to manage a btrfs filesystem; man page
This is the source code of the man page of btrfs. The main changes from my previous patch are: - Rearranged the short command in order to avoid conflicts - Renamed the ''create'' verb is ''subvolume'' Thanks to Daniel for some tweaks on the syntax BR G.Baroncelli diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile index 4e8893b..4a90b75 100644 --- a/man/Makefile +++
2010 May 19
10
R: default subvolume abilities/restrictions
Hi Anthony, I think that for you may be interested to read this thread http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2009/11/20/6588643/thread and to read a my blog about this argument http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html Regards Goffredo >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: anthony@extof.me >Data: 19/05/2010 8.50 >A:
2012 Jun 20
8
[PATCH] Allow cross subvolume reflinks (2nd attempt)
Hello, This is the second attempt to bring in cross subvolume reflinks into btrfs. The first attempt was NAKed due to missing vfs mount checks and a clear description of what btrfs subvolumes are and probably also why cross subvolume reflinks are ok in the case of btrfs. This version of the patch comes from David and is in SUSE kernels since a long time, so it is tested and working. The patch
2010 Nov 30
1
R: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Add ioctl to set snapshot readonly/writable
Hi Li, >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com >Data: 30/11/2010 8.03 >A: <kreijack@libero.it> >Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> >Ogg: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Add ioctl to set snapshot readonly/writable > >Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> Hi Li, >> >> On Monday, 29 November, 2010, Li Zefan wrote: >>> This allows us to set
2010 Jan 14
0
[PATCH] Include subvolume= and metadata_ratio= in /cat/proc
Hi all, this patch include in /proc/mount the info about which subvolume is mounted and which metadata_ratio value is used. $ cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 [...] /dev/sdc /tmp/t4 btrfs rw,relatime,metadata_ratio=20 0 0 /dev/sdc /mnt/btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,degraded,metadata_ratio=20,subvol=snap- of-root 0 0 BR G.Baroncelli commit 3d7ea7bbd70a66c4d0f369b2879c503b722e8834 Author:
2011 Jun 15
2
[PATCH 1/2] use apt-get instead of aptitude
--- config.ml.in | 2 +- configure.ac | 2 +- febootstrap_debian.ml | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.ml.in b/config.ml.in index a8c008a..262c913 100644 --- a/config.ml.in +++ b/config.ml.in @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ let package_version = "@PACKAGE_VERSION@" let yum = "@YUM@" let rpm = "@RPM@"
2006 Aug 12
0
Processed: Re: Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 381481 xen-3.0 Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure Bug reassigned from package `aptitude' to `xen-3.0'. > retitle 381481 pthread_cond_timedwait does not wait enough Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure Changed Bug title. > severity 381481 important Bug#381481: pthread_cond_timedwait does not wait enough
2013 Nov 16
16
[PATCH] BTRFS-PROG: recursively subvolume snapshot and delete
Hi All, the following patches implement the recursively snapshotting and deleting of a subvolume. To snapshot recursively you must pass the -R switch: # btrfs subvolume create sub1 Create subvolume ''./sub1'' # btrfs subvolume create sub1/sub2 Create subvolume ''sub1/sub2'' # btrfs subvolume snapshot -R sub1 sub1-snap Create a snapshot of
2008 Sep 22
1
Hmisc and Ubuntu (aptitude install)
Hi, I'm trying to get the Hmisc module on my Ubuntu Hardy Heron install. I tried getting Hmisc from within R by issuing the standard 'install.packages' command, but it said I needed 'gfortran' to compile. I thought I could circumvent this by using 'aptitude' to get the package 'r-cran-hmisc', but when I got it, the package had critical missing parts (got
2006 Sep 03
6
Aptitude vs. apt
Hi all, I need to write an aptitude provider for Debian. How should it differ from apt? Can I just s/apt/aptitude/g, or do I need to do something else? Any other weird behaviours I should look for or whatever? I''ll make it a subclass of apt (and since Deb seems to specify aptitude as the default now, maybe apt should subclass aptitude), so any dpkg answerfile work should work on
2006 Sep 11
1
Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure
reassign 381481 aptitude thanks > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:54:43AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > | ...................... > > > | rval == -1080447064 > > > | > > > | now2.tv_sec == 1155053066 > > > | now.tv_sec + 2 == 1155053066 > > > | now2.tv_usec == 882203 > > > | now.tv_usec == 887661 > > >
2010 May 20
1
[PATCH ubuntu repost] Ubuntu: Use apt-get instead of aptitude when installing guestfsd.
Previously posted here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2009-December/msg00041.html I can't get aptitude to work under debirf (not on Ubuntu anyway), so using apt-get is necessary for me. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine.
2012 Dec 14
1
mcollective and aptitude safe-upgrade
Guys Compliments of the festive season to everyone. Ive looked at mcollective plugins from http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/mcollective-plugins/wiki And I tried / installed some of them. What im looking for is a method or really a mcollective plugin to ''aptitude safe-upgrade'' on my test VMs. Would anyone have a solution or method on how I can go about this. The only
2010 Feb 22
3
Re: [PATCH 0/3 V3] btrfs: a new tool to manage a btrfs filesystem
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@gmail.com> wrote: >       filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem> -filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <filesystem> +filesystem resize [+/-]<size>[gkm]|max <dev> This command works on devices, not paths. >              Resize a filesystem identified by <path>.  The
2012 Oct 01
3
Tunning - cache write (database)
Hi, First, sorry if this isn''t the place to get this kind of help... If not, I appreciate some link , forum, where I can try get some answers... My problem: * Using btrfs + compression , flush of 60 MB/s take 4 minutes.... (on this 4 minutes they keep constatly I/O of +- 4MB/s no disks) (flush from Informix database) The enviroment : * Virtualized environment * OpenSuse 12.1 64bits,
2012 Jul 05
7
[RFC] Btrfs "sendshots" and hidden snapshots
Hello all, in IRC we had a discussion on how we could solve sending live subvolumes and how to send subvolumes without the need to administrate/keep old snapshots for incremental sends. One of the ideas was to introduce "sendshots", which are basically snapshots where no refs are counted for file data. This means, that when file data is changed in the sendshot origin, we do not consume
2010 Dec 14
0
[PATCH] BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH: store and use the last key found
Hi all, following the thread about the BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH ioctl [1], I made a patch which try to address the problem of restarting the ioctl. In the current solution is the application during the restart of the search to fill the min_* fields in the "struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key". In general the values set are the last one returned "+1". But doing so we reduce the
2004 Jun 24
1
klibc & dynamic linking
Hello, Sorry if this question is a FAQ, but I don't find it anywere. Does klibc support dynamic linking ? TIA -- gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack@inwind.it> Key fingerprint = CE3C 7E01 6782 30A3 5B87 87C0 BB86 505C 6B2A CFF9
2005 Jan 27
1
klibc/ash doesn't compile
Hi, on my system the klibc/ash ( 0.197 ) doesn't compile: [ghigo@therra ash]$ pwd /home/ghigo/klibc/klibc-0.197/ash [ghigo@therra ash]$ make [...] gcc -Wp,-MD,.arith_lex.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include
2020 Apr 20
4
performance problems with notmuch new
Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de at gmail.com> writes: > I also suffer from bad performance of notmuch new. I used notmuch > some years ago and notmuch new always felt instantanious. Had to stop > using it because internet was too slow to sync my mails :/ Now (with > better internet and a completely new setup using mbsync) indexing one > mail takes at least 10 seconds,