similar to: snapshot issues

Hi Anthony, I think that for you may be interested to read this thread http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2009/11/20/6588643/thread and to read a my blog about this argument http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html Regards Goffredo >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: anthony@extof.me >Data: 19/05/2010 8.50 >A:

Hello, The question below is based on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2012- August/004509.html Thanks in advance for any help with the following question, including pointing me to some other info resource if needed. I have a user with an Xubuntu 12.04.1 laptop, 32-bit. He needs to use a USB hard disk drive which has 2 partitions: the 1st partition is NTFS and the 2nd

Good morning Btrfs list, I am trying to create a subvolume of a directory tree (approximately 1.1 million subvolumes under nfs1). The following error is thrown and without the wiki I don''t know what argument is needed. I am running kernel 3.1.0-rc4. [root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub snapshot /btrfs/nfs1/ /btrfs/snaps/ Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot [root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub list

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

Hi, I've just created again the gluster with NFS ganesha. Glusterfs version 3.8 When I run the command gluster nfs-ganesha enable - it returns a success. However, looking at the pcs status, I see this: [root at tlxdmz-nfs1 ~]# pcs status Cluster name: ganesha-nfs Stack: corosync Current DC: tlxdmz-nfs2 (version 1.1.16-12.el7_4.5-94ff4df) - partition with quorum Last updated: Wed Dec 20

Hi, In your ganesha-ha.conf do you have your virtual ip adresses set something like this?: VIP_tlxdmz-nfs1="192.168.22.33" VIP_tlxdmz-nfs2="192.168.22.34" Renaud De?: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] De la part de Hetz Ben Hamo Envoy??: 20 d?cembre 2017 04:35 ??: gluster-users at gluster.org Objet?: [Gluster-users]

I checked, and I have it like this: # Name of the HA cluster created. # must be unique within the subnet HA_NAME="ganesha-nfs" # # The gluster server from which to mount the shared data volume. HA_VOL_SERVER="tlxdmz-nfs1" # # N.B. you may use short names or long names; you may not use IP addrs. # Once you select one, stay with it as it will be mildly unpleasant to # clean up

[root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What''s that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Newbie question! We currently are running a product call TAS from Syntax Corporation and would like to move to Samba. I have review the documentation and cannot find how to set up muliple services on one server. I tried using the Netbios name = and the include statement to bring in another smb.conf file but I don't think I'm on the right track.

E.g. btrfsctl -r -4000m /dev/sda5 results in: ioctl:: Inappropriate ioctl for device Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 Kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic According to the Synaptic Package manager, the version of btrfs-tools is 0.19+20100601-3 Other information that can be of interest: - I started Ubuntu on a live CD - before invoking the btrfsctl command I invoked apt-get update. I have googled but have not

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> (This patch is for the review/test not yet for the integration). Here is an implementation of the feature to add label to the subvolume and snapshots. Which would help sysadmin to better manager the subvol and snapshots. This can be done in two ways, one - using attr which is user land only changes but drawback is able to change the label

Hello, I have some trouble with the current setup (it's a testing environment): 2 server with Dovecot 1.1.4 from source (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) (name: "exim" and "exim2") 1 NFS server (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) I use NFS v.4, indexes shared over NFS. The relavant part of Dovecot configuration: dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes

Hey guys, My NFS server has been working really well for a long time now. Both client and server run CentOS 7.2. However when I just had to remount one of my home directories on an NFS client, I'm now getting the error when I run mount -a mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified This is the corresponding line I have in my fstab file on the client:

Hey all, Having a weird ssh issue I'd like some opinions on. If I have my home directory mounted on the NFS server itself, I get permission denied when I try to ssh into it. The correct permissions and ownership are on the home directory, ssh directory and the authorized_users file. Here's what a verbose ssh session looks like: #ssh -v bluethundr at nfs1.example.com OpenSSH_6.2p2,

Thanks for the quick reply! But I still have problems with btrfsctl: > stat /dev/btrfs-control File: `/dev/btrfs-control'' Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 block special file Device: ch/12d Inode: 659848 Links: 1 Device type: a,3e Access: (0644/brw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2010-01-09 11:31:15.757979602 +0100

Hi list, We've had an interesting NFS performance issue with the following setup. Clients : CentOS 5.5, kernel 2.6.18-194.el5 Server : Solaris 10 kernel Generic_142901-08 Reading a file (not cached) with dd : dd if=file1 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=100 performance is around.. 700 kB/s ! /proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB If we force rsize to a smaller value, 32kB, the

Hi Chris and everyone else, First let me congratulate you for the nice job on btrfs. I've been stress testing it with parallel kernel compiles intermixed with snapshot taking, up to about ~100 load avg on a dual core box and it's doing quite well :-) I noticed that when creating snapshots it seems to always snapshot an entire subvolume, that is if one does: test1:/mnt# btrfsctl -s

In snapshot destroy the dentry used for parent was the snapshot dentry itself. Remove d_invalidate since always return EBUSY, making possible to remove a snapshot using the btrfsctl -D option. Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com> --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 7 ++----- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index

Hey guys, This is kind of odd, so I wanted to do a sanity check. I mounted an NFS share like so: [root at web1:~] #mount -t nfs nfs1.jokefire.com:/home /mnt/home Seemed to go ok. Then I took a look at the output of df -h and didn't see it! [root at web1:~] #df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/vda 40G 24G 14G 64% / devtmpfs

Hello everybody, I've my Gentoo's /usr/portage on a loopback btrfs. Just wanted to sync and got an oops. I've a rsync and a ls process in status D now. The system has been in suspend (tuxonice 3.0-rc3) with mounted btrfs, perhaps that is related? Dec 7 19:18:38 revo BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c Dec 7 19:18:38 revo printing