similar to: [PATCH 00/21] [RFC] Btrfs: restriper

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "[PATCH 00/21] [RFC] Btrfs: restriper"

2007 Dec 17
3
ZFS Roadmap - thoughts on expanding raidz / restriping / defrag
Hey folks, Does anybody know if any of these are on the roadmap for ZFS, or have any idea how long it''s likely to be before we see them (we''re in no rush - late 2008 would be fine with us, but it would be nice to know they''re being worked on)? I''ve seen many people ask for the ability to expand a raid-z pool by adding devices. I''m wondering if it
2012 Feb 03
10
[PATCH 0/3] Btrfs-progs: restriper interface
Hello, This is the userspace part of restriper, rebased onto the new progs infrastructure. Restriper commands are located under ''balance'' prefix, which is now the top level command group. However to not confuse existing users ''balance'' prefix is also available under ''filesystem'': btrfs [filesystem] balance start btrfs [filesystem] balance
2006 Oct 27
9
strange VLAN / domu behavior
Hi there! I am currently setting up a Xen box on 3 VLans, each VLan interface is in a bridge and currently, dom0 is reachable from on of these and is performing great. My only problem is with domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no
2015 Feb 19
2
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
On 2/18/2015 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacs<info at microlinux.fr> wrote: >> >Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : >>> >> >>> >>"installer is organized around mount points" is correct, and what gets >>> >>mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions. >> >
2007 Sep 27
6
Best option for my home file server?
I was recently evaluating much the same question but with out only a single pool and sizing my disks equally. I only need about 500GB of usable space and so I was considering the value of 4x 250GB SATA Drives versus 5x 160GB SATA drives. I had intended to use an AMS 5 disk in 3 5.25" bay hot-swap backplane. http://www.american-media.com/product/backplane/sata300/sata300.html I priced
2004 Jun 08
3
SJAVA error
Hi I'm trying to use SJava and I have troubles. I try to run examples from "Calling R from Java" but,I have an error that "fatal error: enable to open the base package" I heard SJAVA bug, so,could you send me your compiled SJava package with the modified REmbed.c because in Windows i'm not able to recompile!!! --example package org.omegahat.R.Java; public
2013 Apr 11
6
RAID 6 - opinions
I'm setting up this huge RAID 6 box. I've always thought of hot spares, but I'm reading things that are comparing RAID 5 with a hot spare to RAID 6, implying that the latter doesn't need one. I *certainly* have enough drives to spare in this RAID box: 42 of 'em, so two questions: should I assign one or more hot spares, and, if so, how many? mark
2017 Feb 15
3
RAID questions
Hello, Just a couple questions regarding RAID. Here's thesituation. I bought a 4TB drive before I upgraded from 6.8 to 7.3. I'm not too far into this that Ican't start over. I wanted disk space to backup 3 other machines. I way overestimated what I needed for full, incremental and image backups with UrBackup.I've used less than 1TB so far. I would like to add an additional drive
2010 Feb 08
2
Error on start R in server
Hello all, (Thank for your reply) I have a web-application in Apache Tomcat, when i start R in this application, I used packe RSJava Code ROmegahatInterpreter interp; String [] rargs = {"--no-save"}; REvaluator e; interp = new ROmegahatInterpreter ( ROmegahatInterpreter.fixArgs(rargs),false ); e =new REvaluator (); Errors ================ R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14)
2006 May 06
1
R et Java
Bonjour, Je developpe une application java et je veux integrer du code R dans mon programme . Le programme de test que j’ai fait est : import org.omegahat.R.Java.*; public class REvalSample { public static void main(String [] args) { String [] rargs = {"--slave", "--vanilla"}; System.out.println("Sample program to call R engine from
2017 Feb 17
3
RAID questions
On 2017-02-15, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 2/14/2017 4:48 PM, tdukes at palmettoshopper.com wrote: > >> 3 - Can additional drive(s) be added later with a changein RAID level >> without current data loss? > > Only some systems support that sort of restriping, and its a dangerous > activity (if the power fails or system crashes midway through
2013 Aug 20
7
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: use btrfs error code for kernel errors
Now with the below kernel patch, the excl operations like dev add/replace/resize and balance returns the btrfs error code defined in btrfs.h, this patch will help btrfs-progs (and thus user) to know the error string on the terminal (instead of /var/log/messages as previously kernel did). This patch depends on the btrfs kernel patch: btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err
2008 Nov 03
1
is putting zone paths on zfs supported in Solaris 10 u5/u6 ?? Documentation on that? - 66124245
ZFS experts! cu is looking for _documentation_ about putting zone paths on zfs. cu is running 5.10 KP 137111-06. he needs to make sure u5 kp is ok with zone roots. Also has FSs mounted via legacy. So...anybody have documentation on which u5 or u6 of Solaris (NOT OpenSolaris) supports zfs, if any update, for zone paths? -Brian -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Sun#
2011 Oct 31
1
New integration branch for btrfs-progs
All - I''ve put together a new integration branch based on Chris''s new master. This includes the userspace patches for qgroups, restriper, and Josef''s restore utility, plus a bunch of other things with mostly minor impact. The shortlog is attached at the end of this email. As always, it''s available from:
2013 Jan 17
0
[PATCH] qemu-xen-traditional: fix up security patches
I have applied the two security patches mentioned in XSA-41 v2. But we also need this. Ian. commit 2a1354d655d816feaad7dbdb8364f40a208439c1 Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu Jan 17 15:52:16 2013 +0000 e1000: fix compile warning introduced by security fix, and debugging e33f918c19e393900b95a2bb6b10668dfe96a8f2, the fix for XSA-41, and its cherry
2011 Apr 20
4
[PATCH 1/5] Btrfs: fix bh leak on __btrfs_open_devices path
''bh'' is forgot to release if no error is detected Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 8b9fb8c..69fc902 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ static int
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC 2006/124 Configurable Privileges for Zones
Author: comay Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f3f67f97f86c549d01e2d2ac2e266624d9ba3238 Log message: PSARC 2006/124 Configurable Privileges for Zones 4966416 RFE: zone privileges should be configurable 5008923 zoneadm halt message is a little illogical when run from the target zone 5049028 Makefiles that hacked around libpool errors now need cleanup 6345758 zonecfg rctl help
2015 Feb 19
0
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:25 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > disks -> partition(s) -> mdraid devices -> PVs -> VG -> LV -> file system. > phew. You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage and monitor. The raid level is defined per LV, instead of all
2012 May 04
1
BTRFS RAID
Greetings, I have a few questions pertaining to BTRFS RAID. I know it''s been rumored a lot recently that kernel 3.4 will have RAID5/6 support, is this still the case. Also, is it possible to change from a single drive system to a raid system or even a multi drive system without raid to a raid system while there is data on the drives an successfully convert them without loosing data?
2011 Apr 13
1
Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations
On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi at softdux.com> wrote: >> to expand the array :) > > I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. I finally figured out my mistake creating the raid devices and got a working RAID 0 on two RAID 1 arrays. But I wasn't able to add another RAID 1 component to the array with the error mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/md/mdr1_3 as 2: