similar to: [RFC] btrfs auto snapshot

From: anand jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Anand Jain (1): [RFC] Add btrfs autosnap feature Makefile | 6 +- autosnap.c | 1553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ autosnap.h | 81 +++ btrfs-list.c | 140 +++++- btrfs.c | 46 ++- btrfs_cmds.c | 186 +++++++- btrfs_cmds.h | 3 +- scrub.c | 1 + 8 files changed, 1982 insertions(+), 34

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> (This patch is for the review/test not yet for the integration). Here is an implementation of the feature to add label to the subvolume and snapshots. Which would help sysadmin to better manager the subvol and snapshots. This can be done in two ways, one - using attr which is user land only changes but drawback is able to change the label

From: Anand <anand.jain@oracle.com> This patch adds creation-time to the snapshot list display, which would help user to better manage the snapshots when number of snapshots grow substantially. This patch is developed and on top of the send/receive btrfs and btrfs-progs repo at git://github.com/ablock84/linux-btrfs.git (send-v2) git://github.com/ablock84/btrfs-progs.git (send-v2)

Hi all, Just a quick question but can''t find an obvious answer. Can I create/convert a existing (btrfs) directory into a subvolume? It would be very helpful when transferring ''partitions'' into btrfs. I found a similar question way back in google, but that site is down now generally. Thanks in advance. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Hi, I''ve created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to snapper, it''s a tool for managing btrfs snapshots (http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archive/blocxx , and currently uses git source up to commit 50dec40. I''ve done

Hello, We''re a team of 4 final year computer science students and are working on generating a diff between file system snapshots using the send receive code. The output of our utility looks like this- (I''ve tested it on a small subvol with minimal changes just to give an idea) root@nafisa-M-6319:/mnt/btrfs# btrfs sub diff -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2

Full_Name: Paul Eckermann Version: 2.7.1 OS: Windows XP Service Pack 2 Submission from: (NULL) (129.127.183.12) This is the first time I have submitted a bug report, so apologies if I have not followed the correct protocol. If I enter length(rnorm(100*.29)) it returns 28 rather than 29. y<-(1:100)/100 z<-sapply(y,function(x) length(rnorm(x*100))) z!=100*y indicates that it has

is this module still maintained and working? https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_snapper.8.html starting to set up the pieces, I have snapshots in btrfs with snapper itself but so far nothing visible on the windows explorer side. As always I rtfm all over ;-) I assume I have to do some extra magic to allow the winbind users/groups in ... in the related snapper-config I

Hi guys, After having received strong advice from the people in this list to upgrade my kernel to the latest one, I have installed 3.8.0-14-generic #24-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 on several (4) machines. In the hope of improving systems speed I had also removed all snapshots then defragged the FSes - the snapshots have been recreated since, as I use the excellent SuSE "Snapper" tool. But well,

Now with the below kernel patch, the excl operations like dev add/replace/resize and balance returns the btrfs error code defined in btrfs.h, this patch will help btrfs-progs (and thus user) to know the error string on the terminal (instead of /var/log/messages as previously kernel did). This patch depends on the btrfs kernel patch: btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err

Did something break.. ? we are not reporting raid type after balance. ----------- # btrfs fi df /btrfs Data, RAID0: total=2.00GB, used=2.03MB Data: total=8.00MB, used=0.00 System, RAID0: total=16.00MB, used=4.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 Metadata, RAID0: total=2.00GB, used=216.00KB Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB # btrfs bal /btrfs Done, had to relocate 5 out of 5 chunks # btrfs fi

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- mkfs.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mkfs.c b/mkfs.c index de1beed..0843600 100644 --- a/mkfs.c +++ b/mkfs.c @@ -1196,8 +1196,7 @@ static void process_fs_features(u64 flags) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mkfs_features); i++) { if (flags & mkfs_features[i].flag) { - fprintf(stderr,

[11558.527680] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [11558.527708] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1337! [11558.527730] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [11558.527764] CPU 1 [11558.527776] Modules linked in: loop nls_cp437 vfat fat dm_mod xfs exportfs jfs usb_storage uas fuse ext4 jbd2 mbcache snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek arc4 iwlwifi snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec uvcvideo

This adds ioctl BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSIDS which reads the fs info through the btrfs-control Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed,

Hi, I have 4 machines, all converted to BTRFS about 6 months ago, now all running Ubuntu Quantal with kernel 3.5.0-17 The matter is that all these machines are now getting slower and slower everyday, every disk access causing the disk to be 100% busy for long periods, to the point that I''m now seriously considering migrating everything back to ext4... From the start BTRFS was "not

Am 20.06.24 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > >> opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well > > Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896 > > comment 2 might point out the actual

Am 20.06.24 um 17:51 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > So my alternative might be dropping snapper and do the btrfs-snapshots > plus the rotation etc with self-written (=copied) scripts and timers. > > vfs_shadow_copy2 worked in my tests, I only switched to vfs_snapper > because it looked promising to have all the rotation and cleanup of > snapshots done by snapper

We should avoid using non multi-path (mp) path for mp disks As of now there is no good way (like api) to check that. A workaround way is to check if the O_EXCL open is unsuccessful. This is safe since otherwise the BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV ioctl would fail if the disk-path can not be opened with the flag O_EXCL set. This patch also includes some (error) print format changes related to the btrfs

Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896 comment 2 might point out the actual issue with the code, I don't know

Three kind of structures need to be freed on close: * All struct btrfs_device managed by fs_devices * The name field for each struct btrfs_device * The above items for seed_devices Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> --- volumes.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c index